ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1580

Poor Serum Urate Control Is a Driver of Excess Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Gout

Tate Johnson1, Lindsay Helget2, Harlan Sayles2, Punyasha Roul3, James O'Dell2, Ted Mikuls4 and Bryant England2, 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Elkhorn, NE, 2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 3UNMC, Omaha, NE, 4Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Epidemiology, gout, Heart disease, hyperuricemia

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies – Basic and Clinical Science

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: Gout patients suffer from an increased burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It remains unclear whether this risk is related to an excess of CVD risk factors, unique pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying gout, and/or inadequate gout management. Furthermore, while atherothrombotic CVD event risk has been extensively studied, there is a relative paucity of information on risk of incident heart failure (HF) in gout. Thus, we evaluated the associations of gout and gout treatment status with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), HF hospitalization, and CVD-related death in a national cohort of US Veterans.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from 1/1999 to 9/2015. Patients with gout (≥2 ICD-9 codes) were matched up to 1:10 on age, sex, and year of VHA enrollment to patients without a gout ICD-9 code or urate lowering therapy (ULT) dispensing. CVD events (overall, fatal and non-fatal MACE, HF hospitalization, HF death) were identified using validated diagnostic and procedure codes in VHA and linked National Death Index data. Among gout patients, gout treatment status was defined in a time-varying manner over 12-month intervals (including a lag to prevent reverse causation) based on adequate serum urate (SU) control (< 6 mg/dL) and ≥2 dispensings of ULT (Mikuls, JAMA Netw Open, 2022). Multivariable Cox regression models adjusting for CVD risk factors were used to examine the associations of gout and gout treatment status with CVD events.

Results: We matched 559,243 gout patients to 5,407,379 non-gout controls (99% male, mean age 67 years). Over 43,331,604 person-years, we observed 137,162 CVD events in gout (IR 33.96 per 1000 PY) vs. 879,903 in non-gout patients (IR 22.37 per 1000 PY). Crude incidence rates of individual CVD events were also higher in gout vs. non-gout (Table 1). Gout was most strongly associated with HF hospitalization, with a nearly 3-fold higher risk (HR 2.78 [2.73-2.83]) that was attenuated but persisted after adjusting for additional CVD risk factors (aHR 1.68 [1.65-1.70]) and excluding patients with prevalent HF (aHR 1.60 [1.57-1.64]). Gout patients were also at higher risk of HF-related death (aHR 1.25 [1.21-1.29]), MACE (aHR 1.22 [1.21-1.23]), and coronary artery disease-related death (aHR 1.21 [1.20-1.22]). Among gout patients, poor SU control was associated with a higher risk of all CVD events, with the highest CVD risk occurring despite receipt of ULT and related to HF hospitalization (aHR 1.43 [1.34-1.52]) and HF-related death (aHR 1.47 [1.34-1.61]) (Figure 1). A 24% lower risk of HF hospitalization was seen in those with controlled SU and poor ULT administration.

Conclusion: In this large, matched cohort study, despite accounting for CVD risk factors, gout was associated with a 68% increased risk of HF hospitalization, 25% increased risk of HF-related death, and a 22% increased risk of MACE. Among gout patients, poorly controlled SU conferred a higher risk of CVD events independent of ULT use, which may represent a surrogate of more severe disease. Continued research investigating a causal link between gout, hyperuricemia, or its treatment, and CVD risk is needed.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Risk of heart failure and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events among patients with gout vs. matched controls

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Association of serum urate control and urate lowering therapy administration with the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with gout.


Disclosures: T. Johnson, None; L. Helget, None; H. Sayles, None; P. Roul, None; J. O'Dell, None; T. Mikuls, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon, Sanofi, Pfizer Inc; B. England, Boehringer-Ingelheim.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Johnson T, Helget L, Sayles H, Roul P, O'Dell J, Mikuls T, England B. Poor Serum Urate Control Is a Driver of Excess Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/poor-serum-urate-control-is-a-driver-of-excess-cardiovascular-risk-in-patients-with-gout/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/poor-serum-urate-control-is-a-driver-of-excess-cardiovascular-risk-in-patients-with-gout/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology