ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1763

Different Humoral but Similar Cellular Responses of Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Under Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs After COVID-19 Vaccination

Ioana Andreica1, Arturo Blazquez-Navarro2, Jan Sokolar3, Moritz Anft4, Uta Kiltz5, Stephanie Pfaender6, Elena Vidal Blanco7, Timm Westhoff8, Nina Babel8, Ulrik Stervbo9 and Xenofon Baraliakos10, 1Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität-Bochum, Herne, Germany, 2Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies, Berlin, Germany, 3Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany, 4Marienhospital Herne - Klinik Mitte Medizinische Klinik I - Gastroenterologie, Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, Center for Translational Medicine and Immune Diagnostics Laboratory, Medical Department I, Herne and Ruhr-Universit t Bochum, Medical Department I, Bochum, Germany, 5Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, 6Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Medical Department I, Bochum, Germany, 7Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Molecular and Medical Virology, Bochum, Germany, 8Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany, 9Marienhospital Herne - Klinik Mitte Medizinische Klinik I - Gastroenterologie, Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, Center for Translational Medicine and Immune Diagnostics Laboratory, Medical Department I, Herne and Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Medical Department I, Bochum, Germany, 10Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Herne, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Autoantibody(ies), autoimmune diseases, COVID-19, immunology, prognostic factors

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The interplay between humoral and cellular response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients (pts.) with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) remains unknown. To investigate the impact of different immunosuppressive therapies on the development of humoral and cellular immune responses to full 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in AIRD pts. with stable low disease activity.

Methods: The immune reactivity to COVID-19 vaccination was investigated in a prospectively recruited AIRD cohort with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis which received a therapy with IL-17i, TNFi, JAKi or MTX (alone or in combination). Almost all patients received mRNA-based vaccine, only 4 patients had a heterologous scheme. Anti-spike(S) antibodies(ab.) and sera neutralizing capacity (neutralization dilution 50; ND50) were measured 4 weeks after the first (prime+4w) and 4 weeks after the second vaccination (boost+4w). Vaccine-specific cellular immunity was evaluated by quantifying expression of activation markers on T cells as well as their production of key cytokines, at prime+4w and boost+4w.

Results: Overall, a total of 92 pts. were included in the final cohort. 31 (33.7%) pts. were on TNFi, 24 (26.1%) on IL-17i, 24 (26.1%) on JAKi, each group encompassing pts. receiving drug inhibitors alone or in combination with MTX.13 (14.1%) were treated with MTX alone. The median time between the vaccination and blood sampling was 31 [IQR: 28-34] days after prime+4w and 28 [IRQ: 28-28] days after boost+4w. Although at prime+4w only 34/90 (37.8%) of pts. presented neutralizing ab., the majority (86/91, 94.5%), developed them at boost+4w. The highest neutralization titer developed the pts. on IL-17i both at prime+4w (74 [IQR: 13-91]) and boost+4w (798 [IQR: 511- 1344]), while no statistically significant differences were found in the neutralization titer at boost+4w for the TNFi, JAKi, and MTX groups: 207 ND50 [IQR: 120-576], 319 [IQR: 133-461] and 749 [IQR: 264-1920], respectively. 81/90 (90.0%) pts. developed IgG ab. against SARS-CoV-2 S-protein at prime+4w and 91/92 (98.9%) at boost+4w. Pts. receiving IL-17i developed higher ab. titers (8295 U/mL [IQR: 4586-11,237]) compared to the other three groups: JAKi (4405 U/mL [IQR: 1436-7265], TNFi (2313 [IQR: 1156-3630] U/mL) and MTX (2010 U/mL [IQR: 693-9254]). Neutralization capacity correlated well with the titer of anti-S ab. at both timepoints. Coadministration of biologic/tsDMARDs and MTX led to lower titers compared to biologic/tsDMARDs monotherapy. All therapies left frequencies of CD154+CD137+ CD4+ T cells and CD137+ CD8+ T cells at prime+4w and boost+4w unchanged. Polyfunctionality and T cell cytokine profiles across therapies did not significantly vary at boost+4w.

Conclusion: Even after insufficient seroconversion for neutralizing capacity and ab. response against SARS-CoV-2 S-proteins between pts. of different mod of action agents, particularly for MTX and JAKi after first vaccination, a second vaccination covered almost all pts. regardless of DMARDs therapy, with better outcomes in those on IL-17i. T cell immunity revealed similar frequencies of activated T cells in all modes of action after the second vaccination.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Serological immune responses and neutralization titers against SARS-CoV_2 wild variant in time and by different therapies
Neutralization titers (ND50) against SARS-CoV_2 in plasma A) SARS-CoV_2 neutralization antibodies at boost+4w for all four groups of patients on monotherapy B) Comparison between SARS-CoV_2 neutralization antibodies at boost+4w for all four groups of patients on monotherapy (unfilled plots) and combination therapies (filled colored plots) C) Kinetic of SARS-CoV_2 neutralization antibodies for all four groups of patients on monotherapy with IL17i, TNFi, JAKi and MTX. Serological immune responses against SARS-CoV_2 D) Spike-specific IgG titers at boost+4w for all four groups of patients on monotherapy E) Comparison between spike-specific IgG titers at boost+4w for all four groups of patients on monotherapy (unfilled plots) and combination therapies (filled colored plots) F) Correlation of spike-specific IgG titers and SARS-CoV_2 neutralization antibodies at prime+4w G) Correlation of spike-specific IgG titers and SARS-CoV_2 neutralization antibodies at boost+4w. The box plots indicate the 75th, 50th, and 25th quantile, and the whiskers have a maximum length of 1.5 times the interquartile range. Each point represents individual values, small triangles represent the additional patients on combination therapy. The following number of patients are presented: IL17i (n=19 prime+4w and n=18 boost+4w), TNFi (n=27 prime+4w, n=27 boost+4w), JAKi (n=18 prime+4w, n=18 boost+4w) and MTX (n=11 prime+4w, n=13 boost+4w), IL17i/MTX (n=5 boost+4w), TNFi/MTX (n=4 boost+4w), JAKi/MTX (n=6 boost+4w). ND50=50% inhibitory dilution. U/ml=units/mililiter. IL=interleukin. TNF=tumor necrosis factor. JAK= Janus kinase inhibitor. MTX=methotrexate. ρ=Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2 Memory phenotype of activated cells is perturbed by different therapies:
PBMCs were stimulated with peptides spanning the SARS-CoV_2 Spike-protein and activated cells were evaluated by multiparametric flow cytometry. Phenotype of CD4+ T cells reactive to SARS-CoV_2 S-protein A) Memory/Naive phenotype of SARS-CoV_2 Spike-reactive CD4+ T cells at boost+4w. Naïve (CD45RA+CCR7+), central memory (CM; CD45RA–CCR7+), effector memory (EM; CD45RA–CCR7–), and EM expressing CD45RA (TEMRA; CD45RA+CCR7–). Phenotype of CD8+ T cells reactive to SARS-CoV_2 S-protein B) Memory/Naive phenotype of SARS-CoV_2 Spike-reactive CD8+ T cells at boost+4w. The cell populations are defined as for A) C-D) Frequency of the cytokines IL_2, IFN-γ, TNF and GrB for SARS-CoV_2 Spike-reactive CD4+ (C) CD8+ (D) T cells at boost+4w. E-F) Boolean combinations of assayed cytokines for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The box plots indicate the 75th, 50th, and 25th quantile, and the whiskers have a maximum length of 1.5 times the interquartile range. Each point represents a patient. IL=interleukin. TNF=tumor necrosis factor. JAK= Janus kinase inhibitor. MTX=methotrexate. Gr= granzyme

Supporting image 3

Table 1. Demographics, comorbidities and therapy for all patients
RA: rheumatoid arthritis, axSpA: axial spondyloathritis, PsA: psoriatic arthritis, GC: glucocorticoid, mg: milligram, IL: interleukin, i: inhibitor, MTX: methotrexate: TNF: tumor necrosis factor, JAK: janus kinase. For quantitative variables, data are provided as median [IQR], while for categorical variables the count (% frequency) is provided


Disclosures: I. Andreica, None; A. Blazquez-Navarro, None; J. Sokolar, None; M. Anft, None; U. Kiltz, AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Fresenius, GSK, Hexal, Novartis, Pfizer, Biocad, Lilly, Grünenthal, Janssen, MSD, Roche, UCB; S. Pfaender, None; E. Vidal Blanco, None; T. Westhoff, None; N. Babel, None; U. Stervbo, None; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Andreica I, Blazquez-Navarro A, Sokolar J, Anft M, Kiltz U, Pfaender S, Vidal Blanco E, Westhoff T, Babel N, Stervbo U, Baraliakos X. Different Humoral but Similar Cellular Responses of Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Under Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs After COVID-19 Vaccination [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/different-humoral-but-similar-cellular-responses-of-patients-with-autoimmune-inflammatory-rheumatic-diseases-under-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-after-covid-19-vaccination/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/different-humoral-but-similar-cellular-responses-of-patients-with-autoimmune-inflammatory-rheumatic-diseases-under-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-after-covid-19-vaccination/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology