ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1836

Alternative Renal Response Definitions in a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Obinutuzumab for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Zahir Amoura1, Philippe Remy2, Luis Fernando Quintana Porras3, Laurent Chiche4, Dominique Chauveau5, Dario Roccatello6, Richard Furie7, Thomas Schindler8, Jay Garg9, Matthew Cascino9, Brad Rovin10 and Andrea Doria11, 1Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, 2APHP Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor, Creteil, France, 3Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 4Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France, 5Hôpital Rangueil, Centre Hospitalier Univ de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, 6S Giovanni Hospital, Univ of Turin, Turin, Italy, 7Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, NY, 8F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, 9Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 10The Ohio State University, Columbus, 11University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, B-Lymphocyte, Inflammation, Lupus nephritis, Nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Obinutuzumab, a type II anti-CD20 mAb, resulted in rapid and complete B-cell depletion and improved renal responses in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in the Phase 2 NOBILITY trial and will be further evaluated in the Phase 3 REGENCY trial. Recent analyses suggest alternative urinary sediment, serum creatinine (SCr), and urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) requirements may be better measures of response in LN than those used in NOBILITY [1,2]. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the NOBILITY response definitions and to report the results of NOBILITY using alternative definitions of renal response.

Methods: 126 patients with active Class III/IV LN were randomized to obinutuzumab or placebo in combination with mycophenolate and glucocorticoids. NOBILITY complete renal response (CRR) required UPCR < 0.5, SCr ≤ the upper limit of normal (ULN) of the reference laboratory and not increased > 15% from baseline SCr, and inactive urinary sediment. Exploratory analyses were conducted, and alternative response definitions were evaluated post hoc.

Results: NOBILITY CRR was increased with obinutuzumab over placebo at Week 52 (35% vs. 23%, P = 0.11) and Week 76 (40% vs. 18%, P = 0.007). Response rates were low among patients with baseline SCr < 0.65 mg/dL (n = 45) due to the requirement that SCr not increase > 15% from baseline; increasing this threshold to 25% increased the response rate to a level similar to other groups (Figure). Alternative response definitions demonstrated increased rates of response in both treatment groups and similar benefits of obinutuzumab over placebo at Weeks 52 and 76 (Table).

Conclusion: Obinutuzumab resulted in consistent treatment benefits across a range of renal response definitions in NOBILITY and will be further evaluated in REGENCY. A requirement that SCr not increase > 15% from baseline may be overly restrictive in patients with low baseline SCr (< 0.65 mg/dL), where a change of 15% represents < 0.1 mg/dL and is of questionable clinical relevance. These findings may inform LN clinical trial design and more accurately reflect clinical practice.  References:

  1. Dall’era M et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1305-13.
  2. Almaani S et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:669 [abstract].

Figure. Week 76 response in NOBILITY by baseline serum creatinine level

Table. Data from NOBILITY at weeks 52 and 76 using several response definitions


Disclosure: Z. Amoura, Roche, 2; P. Remy, None; L. Quintana Porras, None; L. Chiche, None; D. Chauveau, None; D. Roccatello, None; R. Furie, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, 2, 5; T. Schindler, Roche, 1, 3; J. Garg, Genentech, 1, 3; M. Cascino, Genentech, 1, 3; B. Rovin, GSK, 1, Aurinia, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Novartis, 5, Alexion, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5; A. Doria, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Amoura Z, Remy P, Quintana Porras L, Chiche L, Chauveau D, Roccatello D, Furie R, Schindler T, Garg J, Cascino M, Rovin B, Doria A. Alternative Renal Response Definitions in a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Obinutuzumab for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/alternative-renal-response-definitions-in-a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-obinutuzumab-for-proliferative-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/alternative-renal-response-definitions-in-a-randomized-controlled-trial-of-obinutuzumab-for-proliferative-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology