ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2026
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR Convergence 2024

Abstract Number: 2010

The Influence of Treat-to-target Urate Lowering Therapy and Anti-inflammatory Prophylaxis on Circulating Measures of Inflammation in Gout

Austin Wheeler1, Tanner Ourada2, Michael Duryee1, Bryant England1, Richard Reynolds3, James O'Dell1, Jeff Newcomb1, Michael Pillinger4, Robert Terkeltaub5, Ryan Ferguson6, Mary Brophy6, Tony Merriman7 and Ted Mikuls1, 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 2University of Nebraska-Medical Center: College of Medicine, Omaha, NE, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York,, NY, 5Retired, San Diego, CA, 6Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham, Homewood, AL

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biomarkers, gout, Inflammation

Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis worldwide and is associated with substantial cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality. In the STOP Gout trial (O’Dell JR et al. NEJM Evid 2022), participants with gout receiving treat-to-target urate-lowering therapy (ULT) with allopurinol or febuxostat experienced significant reductions in C-reactive protein concentrations during the 72-week study. Whether treat-to-target ULT or anti-inflammatory prophylaxis reduces other measures of subclinical inflammation implicated in cardiometabolic disease is unknown. In this study, we examined changes in inflammatory biomarkers in patients on ULT and whether changes observed were associated with specific ULT agent and/or anti-inflammatory prophylaxis administered.

Methods: We included a subset of participants from the STOP-Gout study (total enrollment=940), all of whom met classification criteria for gout, had been randomized to allopurinol or febuxostat, received anti-inflammatory prophylaxis for 6-12 months, and had banked biosamples available from baseline, 24-, and 48-week visits. We measured a panel of 20 circulating biomarkers using commercially available assays, which included inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adipokines, and cardiac analytes selected based on published associations with gout or reports demonstrating decreases on ULT. Biomarkers were normalized via log-transformation for models and standardized for graphical comparison of trends. Changes in individual biomarkers from baseline were evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Factors assessed as possible determinants of biomarker change included baseline demographics and co-morbidities, as well as ULT agent, prophylaxis (use and agent), and serum urate (sUA) concentration over time throughout the trial. ULT and prophylaxis at baseline were not considered relevant, as these agents had not been started at the time of lab draw.

Results: Participants included in this analysis (n=282) had a mean age of 70.0 years, and were predominantly male (96.4%), reported White race (75.2%), and were overweight/obese (mean BMI 33.1 kg/m2). Mean sUA at enrollment was 8.5 mg/dl and 91% used colchicine for prophylaxis. Of the 20 biomarkers evaluated, five changed significantly over time when accounting for covariates (Figure 1). Four of these (calprotectin, leptin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], and IL12p70) were also affected by prophylactic agents, although this was variable by analyte and time point.

Conclusion: Select inflammatory biomarkers (calprotectin, leptin, NT-proBNP, IL12p70, and IL-18) significantly change during treatment with ULT via a treat-to-target approach. These findings suggest that ULT may provide important systemic benefits through long-term anti-inflammatory effects beyond reducing the burden of acute flares. These results provide additional support for the importance of effective management of ULT via a treat-to-target approach.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Line plot of standardized biomarkers with significant change over time on urate lowering therapy.
No change over time in lactotransferrin, MCP_1, IL_1RA, MPO, IL-6, GM-CSF, troponin, IL_1β, IFNα, adiponectin, TNF, FGF_21, IL-8, MIP_1, or oxidized LDL. Biomarkers normalized for comparison (mean 0, standard deviation 1). P values represent change over time from baseline via generalized estimating equations.
Abbreviations: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), interleukin (IL), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP), IL_1RA (interleukin_1 receptor antagonist), myeloperoxidase (MPO), granulocyte-monocyte stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon (IFN), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), low density lipoprotein (LDL), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)


Disclosures: A. Wheeler: None; T. Ourada: None; M. Duryee: None; B. England: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5; R. Reynolds: None; J. O'Dell: None; J. Newcomb: None; M. Pillinger: Amgen, 2, Federation Bio, 2, Fortress Bioscience and Scilex, 2, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, 5; R. Terkeltaub: Acquist, 1, Astra-Zeneca, 2, BGP Bio, 2, Fortress, 2, G-CAN, 12, Non-salaried President of nonprofit gout research networking foundation, Generate Biomedicines, 2, Horizon, 2, Inozyme, 1, Jiangsu Atom Bioscience, 2, LG Chem, 2, Selecta Biosciences, 2, Synlogic, 2; R. Ferguson: None; M. Brophy: None; T. Merriman: None; T. Mikuls: Elsevier, 9, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, Wolters Kluwer Health (UpToDate), 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wheeler A, Ourada T, Duryee M, England B, Reynolds R, O'Dell J, Newcomb J, Pillinger M, Terkeltaub R, Ferguson R, Brophy M, Merriman T, Mikuls T. The Influence of Treat-to-target Urate Lowering Therapy and Anti-inflammatory Prophylaxis on Circulating Measures of Inflammation in Gout [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-influence-of-treat-to-target-urate-lowering-therapy-and-anti-inflammatory-prophylaxis-on-circulating-measures-of-inflammation-in-gout/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-influence-of-treat-to-target-urate-lowering-therapy-and-anti-inflammatory-prophylaxis-on-circulating-measures-of-inflammation-in-gout/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology