ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1459

The Association of Frequent Knee Bending with Trajectories of Pain and Physical Function over 8 Years in Knee Osteoarthritis

Jason Jakiela1, Dana Voinier1, Thomas Bye1, Maria Tukis1, Kiely Konyak1, Dylan Orloff1 and Daniel White1, 1University of Delaware, Newark, DE

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Epidemiology, Osteoarthritis, pain, physical function

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Clinical Practice II (1457–1461)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 10:00AM-10:50AM

Background/Purpose: Frequent bending increases loading at the knee and is a risk factor for worsening knee pain associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Knee bending is also common during activities of daily living, such as climbing stairs, and beneficial for lower extremity strength. Presently, it is unclear if frequent knee bending is helpful or harmful for trajectories of pain and function, thus understanding this association is important to help weigh its costs and benefits. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the association of knee bending and 8-year trajectories of pain and function in adults with or at risk for knee OA.

Methods: We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a prospective cohort study of adults with or at risk for knee OA. Knee bending activities over the previous 30 days were collected at baseline (BL) via two yes/no questions: (1) climbing up 10+ flights of stairs in 1 day (stair use) and (2) lifting/moving objects weighing 25+ lbs by hand in 1 day (lifting). Pain and function were assessed at BL and six follow-up (FU) visits (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 years). Knee pain severity in the past 30 days was determined via a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 0-10). Function was assessed using self-selected gait speed over 20m. Samples were restricted to those with low pain (< 3/10) or good function (≥ 1.22m/s) at BL and trajectories were identified using group-based modeling. To determine the association between each knee bending activity and group membership for pain and function trajectories, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using multinomial logistic regression, adjusted for confounders.

Results: Of those with complete data at BL and at least 2 FU visits, two separate trajectory models were run for both pain (age: 61.9 ± 9.0 years, sex: 56.7% female, BMI: 27.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2) and function (age: 60.1 ± 8.8 years, sex: 54.7% female, BMI: 27.8 ± 4.5 kg/m2). We identified 3 pain trajectory groups: Minimal Pain, Low Pain, and Worsening Pain. The Worsening Pain trajectory group exceeded the Patient Acceptable Symptom State ( > 3/10) by 24 months, while the other trajectories remained at 0 or 1 (Figure 1). However, no associations were found between knee bending activities and pain trajectory group membership. We identified 3 function trajectory groups: No Decline, Minimal Decline, and Fast Decline. The Fast Decline trajectory dropped below 1.22 m/s by 24 months, while the other trajectories remained above this cutoff with little decline over 8 years (Figure 2). Those who reported no stair use had 40% [1.40 (1.06, 1.84)] greater odds of being in the Fast Decline group relative to those who reported stair use. Those who reported no lifting had 49% [1.49 (1.18, 1.89)] and 61% [1.61 (1.17, 2.21)] greater odds of being in the No or Minimal Decline groups, respectively, relative to those who reported lifting.

Conclusion: Adults who did not engage in knee bending activities at BL had greater odds of membership in the slowest gait speed trajectory group, relative to those who did. Additionally, knee bending was not associated with any of the pain trajectories. This indicates that stair use and lifting may be unrelated to pain and favorably associated with gait speed trajectories in adults with or at risk for knee OA.

Figure 1: Trajectories of VAS pain over 96 months of follow-up

Figure 2: Trajectories of gait speed over 96 months of follow-up

Table 1: Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between frequent knee bending and pain and gait speed trajectory group membership


Disclosure: J. Jakiela, None; D. Voinier, None; T. Bye, None; M. Tukis, None; K. Konyak, None; D. Orloff, None; D. White, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jakiela J, Voinier D, Bye T, Tukis M, Konyak K, Orloff D, White D. The Association of Frequent Knee Bending with Trajectories of Pain and Physical Function over 8 Years in Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-association-of-frequent-knee-bending-with-trajectories-of-pain-and-physical-function-over-8-years-in-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-association-of-frequent-knee-bending-with-trajectories-of-pain-and-physical-function-over-8-years-in-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology