ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1389

Subclinical ILD Is Frequent and Progresses Across Different Connective Tissue Diseases

Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold1, Helena Andersson2, Silje Reiseter2, Håvard Fretheim2, Imon Barua1, Torhild Garen3, Øyvind Midtvedt1, Ragnar Gunnarsson2, Michael Durheim2, Trond Mogens AAløkken2 and Øyvind Molberg1, 1Department of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Department of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Nepal

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Cohort Study, interstitial lung disease, Myositis, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster II (1364–1390)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Based on the argument that symptoms-define-disease, physicians commonly apply the terms pre-clinical or sub-clinical disease to describe patients with disease-related findings, but no accompanying symptoms. For patients with connective tissue disease associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), the term sub-clinical applies frequently to patients with mild ILD changes on HRCT, within normal range functional capacity and no respiratory symptoms. Previous work in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-ILD did however show that patients with even minor extent of ILD at baseline often progressed and had increased mortality risk; indicating that it is not appropriate to define these patients as “subclinical”. The objective of this study was to to identify the prevalence of subclinical ILD across CTD diagnoses, and assess the rate of progression of lung fibrosis compared to CTD without ILD and with clinical ILD.

Methods: All CTD patients, including SSc, anti-syntethase syndrome (ASS) and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) from the Oslo University Hospital diagnosed before 2015 assessed for the presence of ILD by HRCT were included. 2015 was chosen to secure an observation time of at least 5 years from ILD diagnosis to study end on 01.01.2021 or time of death. All patients fulfilled the respective CTD classification criteria. Subclinical ILD was defined as an ILD extent < 5% by semi-quantitative assessment at baseline HRCT, preserved lung function with a forced vital capacity (FVC) >80%predicted and no respiratory symptoms. Clinical ILD was defined as >5% extent of ILD or < 5% extent of ILD on HRCT with respiratory symtoms or FVC< 80%. The outcome was progression of lung fibrosis assessed on HRCT at follow up. Vital status was available in all patients and mortality assessed. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted and time to progressive event determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results: We identified 525 CTD patients, including 296 SSc, 135 MCTD and 94 ASS patients assessed for ILD. Of these, 227 (43%) had no ILD, 67 (13%) subclinical and 231 (44%) clinical ILD (Table). Of the 67 subclinical ILD patients, 45 (15%) had SSc, 13 (10%) MCTD and 9 (10%) ASS. Over a median time of 4.5 years between baseline and follow up HRCT, 95/395 (24%) showed lung fibrosis progression, including 72 (26%) SSc and 23 (19%) MCTD patients. Disease progression was frequently present in both subclinical ILD (38%) and clinical ILD (51%) patients (Figure). Age, gender, underlying CTD and baseline lung function were not predictive for lung fibrosis progression. The events were too low for multivariable regression analyses. After a median observational period of 12 years, 153 (29%) of the patients died. The 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates in no ILD, subclinical and clinical ILD were 97%/97%/99%, 88%/91%/82% and 82%/85%/68% (p< 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: Subclinical ILD is frequently present across CTDs and progresses over time in a substantial subgroup of patients, comparable to patients with clinical ILD. Our findings question the terms sub- and preclinical ILD, which may potentially lead to to a suboptimal “watchful waiting management strategy”.

Table1: Clinical characteristics, demographics and outcome of CTD without ILD, and with subclinical and clinical ILD

Figur 1: Time to progressive event


Disclosures: A. Hoffmann-Vold, Actelion, 1, 2, 6, Arxx Therapeutics, 1, 2, Bayer, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 1, 2, 5, 6, Lilly, 6, Medscape, 2, 6, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 6, Roche, 6; H. Andersson, None; S. Reiseter, None; H. Fretheim, Bayer, 12, Dr. Fretheim reports grants from Norwegian Women's Public Health Association, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bayer and travel bursaries from Actelion and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work; ., Actelion, 12, Travel bursaries from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, 12, travel bursaries GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work;; I. Barua, None; T. Garen, None; . Midtvedt, None; R. Gunnarsson, None; M. Durheim, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, 12, Spouse is a BI employee, Roche, 2, 6; T. AAløkken, None; . Molberg, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hoffmann-Vold A, Andersson H, Reiseter S, Fretheim H, Barua I, Garen T, Midtvedt , Gunnarsson R, Durheim M, AAløkken T, Molberg. Subclinical ILD Is Frequent and Progresses Across Different Connective Tissue Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subclinical-ild-is-frequent-and-progresses-across-different-connective-tissue-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subclinical-ild-is-frequent-and-progresses-across-different-connective-tissue-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology