ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0246

Safety & Efficacy of SEL-212 in Patients with Gout Refractory to Conventional Treatment: Primary Outcomes from Two Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase 3 Studies

Herbert Baraf1, Alan Kivitz2, Sheri Rhodes3, Sheldon Leung4, Olu Folarin4, Tania Gonzalez-Rivera5, Joanna Sobierska5, Jacquie Christie5, Anand Patel6, Wesley DeHaan4, Rehan Azeem4 and Peter Traber7, 1The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research, George Washington University, Rheumatology, Bethesda, MD, 2Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 3Selecta Biosciences, Atlanta, GA, 4Selecta Biosciences, Inc., Watertown, MA, 5Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi), Stockholm, Sweden, 6Pioneer Research Solutions, Houston, TX, 7Selecta Biosciences, Gladwyne, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Crystal-induced arthritis, gout, hyperuricemia, Outcome measures, Randomized Trial

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0229–0251) Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In patients with refractory gout, the inability to maintain serum uric acid (sUA) levels < 6 mg/dL leads to severe clinical manifestations for which uricase-based therapies can be highly effective, though also immunogenic.1 SEL-212 is a once-monthly, novel 2-component, uricase-based infusion therapy being investigated in patients with refractory gout. SEL-212 consists of an infusion of tolerogenic nanoparticles containing rapamycin (SEL-110) followed by pegadricase (SEL-037).2 DISSOLVE I and II (D1 and D2, respectively) evaluated the safety and efficacy of SEL-212 in adults with refractory gout.

Methods: D1 (US) and D2 (Global), were placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials that evaluated two dose levels of SEL-110 (0.15 mg/kg [high-dose] or 0.1 mg/kg [low-dose]) prior to SEL-037 (0.2 mg/kg) infusion. Participants were enrolled if they had ≥ 3 gout flares within 18 months prior to screening or ≥ 1 tophus or a current diagnosis of gouty arthritis, failed to normalize sUA and control symptoms with any xanthine oxidase inhibitor, and were not previously exposed to a pegylated uricase-based therapy. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 between the two doses of SEL-212 and placebo administered intravenously every 28 days for 6 treatments. D1 participants continued in a 6-month blinded extension phase under the initial treatment conditions (Fig. 1). The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved and maintained sUA < 6 mg/dL for ≥ 80% of the sixth treatment period (TP6). Safety and tolerability were assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

Results: 112 participants (96% male, 66% ≥ 50 years) were enrolled in D1 and 153 (97% male, 72% ≥ 50 years) in D2. Response rates in all treatment groups were significantly different from placebo (p ≤ 0.0008), with 56% and 46% of participants responding in the high-dose group and 48% and 40% in the low-dose group for D1 and D2, respectively (Figure 2). The response rates in participants aged ≥ 50 years were 65% and 47% in the high-dose groups and 47% and 44% in the low-dose groups for D1 and D2, respectively (p ≤ 0.0026 vs placebo). Across all participants in the treatment groups, sUA levels were significantly reduced from baseline (p< 0.001 vs placebo) at TP6 (Figure 3). The safety profile of SEL-212 was favorable, with 3.4% and 4.5% of participants experiencing infusion reactions in the high and low-dose groups, respectively. Reports of gout flares were comparable between treatment groups and placebo. Six participants (3.4%) in the pooled active treatment groups experienced treatment-related serious AEs (n=4 anaphylaxis, n=2 gout flares).

Conclusion: In the DISSOLVE trials, once-monthly treatment with SEL-212 demonstrated statistically significant response rates and reductions in sUA versus placebo. The safety profile of SEL-212 was consistent with that of uricase therapies. Targeted immunomodulation with SEL-212 has the potential to provide a new uricase-based treatment option for patients with gout refractory to conventional therapies.

  1. Edwards NL. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58(9):2587-90.
  2. Sands E, et al. Nat Commun 2022;13:272.

Supporting image 1

DISSOLVE I & II study design.

Supporting image 2

Primary efficacy endpoint. (1) The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved and maintained sUA < 6 mg/dL for at least 80% of the sixth treatment period (TP6). Subjects who dropped from study due to stopping rule, AE, and COVID were considered non-responders. Percentages shown are averaged over multiple imputed datasets for missing sUA for withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up, and other as per FDA guidance. (2) Difference vs placebo [97.5% CI] and p-value versus placebo group for each treatment group are indicated above each bracket.

Supporting image 3

Serum uric acid reduction from baseline to treatment period six (TP6). (1) Reduction of mean sUA as computed by subtracting the Baseline (BL) sUA level from the mean sUA during Treatment Period 6 (TP6) defined as the area under the time curve divided by the corresponding time interval. (2) Analysis using ANCOVA model with reduction or percent reduction of mean sUA at TP6 from baseline as dependent variable and randomization stratum and baseline sUA as covariates. Missing values of change or percent change from baseline were multiple imputed by using the Recursively Partitioned Mixture Model. The means of treatment groups are pooled estimates after multiple imputation and 2-sided p-values.  (3) Percent reduction mean sUA as computed by subtracting Baseline (BL) sUA level from the mean sUA during TP6 divided by the Baseline and reported as either absolute difference or percent difference.


Disclosures: H. Baraf: Horizon Pharmaceuticals, 5, 6, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi), 5, 6; A. Kivitz: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, 11, Chemocentryx, 1, Eli Lilly, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Genzyme, 2, Gilead, 2, 11, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), 2, 6, 11, Grunenthal, 2, Horizon, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 4, 11, Pfizer, 2, 6, 11, Selecta, 2, Synact, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 1, 6; S. Rhodes: Selecta Biosciences, 3, 11; S. Leung: Selecta Biosciences, 3, 11; O. Folarin: Selecta Biosciences, 3, 11; T. Gonzalez-Rivera: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi), 3; J. Sobierska: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi), 3; J. Christie: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 11, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi), 3; A. Patel: Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, 6; W. DeHaan: Selecta Biosciences, 3, 11; R. Azeem: Selecta Biosciences, 3, 11; P. Traber: Selecta Biosciences, 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baraf H, Kivitz A, Rhodes S, Leung S, Folarin O, Gonzalez-Rivera T, Sobierska J, Christie J, Patel A, DeHaan W, Azeem R, Traber P. Safety & Efficacy of SEL-212 in Patients with Gout Refractory to Conventional Treatment: Primary Outcomes from Two Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase 3 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-efficacy-of-sel-212-in-patients-with-gout-refractory-to-conventional-treatment-primary-outcomes-from-two-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-multicenter-phase-3-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-efficacy-of-sel-212-in-patients-with-gout-refractory-to-conventional-treatment-primary-outcomes-from-two-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-multicenter-phase-3-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology