ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1232

Reliability and Validity of Single Axial Slice vs. Multiple Slice Quantitative Measurement of the Volume of Effusion-Synovitis on 3T Knee MRI in Knees with Osteoarthritis

Greg Gilles1, Arjun Vohra1, Chelsea Caruso1, Dagoberto Robles1, Mihra Taljanovic1, Jeffrey Duryea2, Erin Ashbeck1, Edward Bedrick3 and Kent Kwoh4, 1University of Arizona Arthritis Center, Tucson, AZ, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 4University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biomarkers, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Measurement Instrument, Osteoarthritis, Synovitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Effusion-synovitis (ES) on knee MRI has been identified as an important biomarker of OA. Semi-automated software methods offer objective measurements of ES volume on MRI, but efficiency is crucial, especially for studies involving many MRIs. We developed a quantitative measurement of ES using the single axial slice with the largest area of ES, evaluated the reliability of the new single-slice quantitative measurement of ES, and correlated this measurement of ES with the previously validated method based on multi-slice quantitative measurement of ES and with a validated semi-quantitative scoring of ES to demonstrate that the single-slice ES method is a valid substitute.

Methods: OAI participants with radiographic OA (i.e., Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] 2,3) in at least 1 knee at baseline with prior semi-quantitative assessment of ES by a MSK radiologist were randomly selected (n=50 knees; 1 knee per participant). Four non-expert readers were trained to use custom semi-automated software and a programmed multi-button mouse (see Figure 1) to measure ES volume on 3T MRI (see Figure 2) under the direction of a MSK radiologist, and then read scans from the KL 2,3 sample blinded to prior assessments (twice for 3 readers; once for 1 reader). Intra- and inter-reader reliability was evaluated based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) from a linear mixed model with random effects for knee, reader, and interaction between knee and reader. We assessed agreement with the mean absolute difference (MAD). In a subset of the FNIH study (n=301), one reader measured single-slice ES volume, blinded to the prior multi-slice quantitative measurements of ES. We estimated the Spearman correlation coefficient between single-slice and multi-slice volume of ES in the FNIH subset. Validity was evaluated based on Spearman correlation between single-slice ES volume and semi-quantitative ES MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) in the KL 2,3 sample and the FNIH subset. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated from bias-corrected and acceleration-adjusted bootstrap.

Results: In this sample of KL 2,3 knees, the mean single-slice ES volume was 312.8 mm3 with standard deviation 218.4 mm3. The intra-reader ICC was 0.96 (95%CI 0.93-0.97) and inter-reader ICC was 0.90 (95%CI 0.87-0.95); the intra-reader MAD was 36 mm3 (95%CI 28-44) and inter-reader MAD was 61 mm3 (95%CI 48-75). The estimated correlation between single-slice and multi-slice ES volume was 0.75 (95%CI 0.68-0.81; Figure 3). Correlation between single-slice ES volume and MOAKS ES was 0.62 (95%CI 0.39-0.79) in the KL 2,3 sample and 0.67 (95%CI 0.59-0.73) in the FNIH subset (Figure 4A), while correlation between multi-slice ES volume and MOAKS ES was 0.74 (95%CI 0.68-0.79) in the FNIH subset (Figure 4B).

Conclusion: The more efficient single-slice quantitative measurement of ES had excellent intra-and inter-reader reliability with non-expert readers, and good correlation with both the multi-slice quantitative ES measurement and MOAKS semi-quantitative assessment of ES. Single-slice quantitative measurement is an efficient surrogate for multi-slice assessment, having shown similar validity based on comparison to semi-quantitative scoring by experienced MSK radiologists.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Diagram of mouse displaying 20 software functions programmed as buttons that can be performed rapidly to generate effusion-synovitis shadings and subregional divisions.

Supporting image 2

Figure 2: Coordinated software system and effusion-synovitis measurement method used to generate effusion-synovitis shadings and subregional divisions and verify/revise areas of fine detail. Original slice shown in bottom left corner; preview of shadings and regions generated in top left corner; active program in top right corner; magnifier on cursor below active program.

Supporting image 3

Figure 3: Single-slice vs multi-slice measurement of effusion-synovitis volume.
Figure 4A: Single-slice effusion-synovitis volume vs semi-quantitative MOAKS effusion-synovitis scores; 4B: Multi-slice effusion-synovitis volume vs semi-quantitative MOAKS effusion-synovitis scores.


Disclosures: G. Gilles, None; A. Vohra, None; C. Caruso, None; D. Robles, None; M. Taljanovic, None; J. Duryea, None; E. Ashbeck, None; E. Bedrick, None; K. Kwoh, Express Scripts, Kolon TissueGene, Avalor Therapeutics, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, LG Chem, Novartis, AbbVie/Abbott, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK).

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gilles G, Vohra A, Caruso C, Robles D, Taljanovic M, Duryea J, Ashbeck E, Bedrick E, Kwoh K. Reliability and Validity of Single Axial Slice vs. Multiple Slice Quantitative Measurement of the Volume of Effusion-Synovitis on 3T Knee MRI in Knees with Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reliability-and-validity-of-single-axial-slice-vs-multiple-slice-quantitative-measurement-of-the-volume-of-effusion-synovitis-on-3t-knee-mri-in-knees-with-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reliability-and-validity-of-single-axial-slice-vs-multiple-slice-quantitative-measurement-of-the-volume-of-effusion-synovitis-on-3t-knee-mri-in-knees-with-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology