ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1427

Reduction of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality versus Risk of New Onset Diabetes with Statin Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Gulsen Ozen1, Sophie Dell’Aniello2, Sofia Pedro3, Kaleb Michaud4 and Samy Suissa5, 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Bellevue, NE, 2Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Research Institute - Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Forward, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, 4University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 5Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Research Institute - Jewish General Hospital;Depts of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Cohort Study, Comorbidity, Mortality, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Plenary III (1424–1429)

Session Type: Plenary Session

Session Time: 11:15AM-11:30AM

Background/Purpose: The risks of death and of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are increased in RA mainly due to inflammation mediated accelerated cardiovascular disease (CVD) and insulin resistance. In the general population, statins reduce CVD and mortality with a slight increase in T2DM risk. We aimed to assess CVD and mortality benefits and T2DM risk with statins in RA patients.

Methods: We conducted a prevalent new-user cohort study within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, the Hospital Episode Statistics [HES] and Office of National Statistics [ONS] databases. The cohort included individuals ≥18 years old who had a 1st diagnosis of RA and ≥1 DMARD use with no alternative diagnoses and ≥1 year baseline data between 1989 and 2018. Patients with prior DM and no HES/ONS linkage were excluded for T2DM and CVD/mortality cohorts, respectively. Statin initiators were matched with non-users (1:2) on the time-conditional propensity score (TCPS) that included age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol, joint surgeries, prior CVD, hypertension, rheumatic diseases comorbidity index, osteoporosis/fractures, cancer, thyroid, chronic liver, kidney, lung and other heart diseases, healthcare utilization, DMARDs, glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and CVD medications (DM and ethnicity for CVD/mortality). The subjects were followed up for the outcomes of CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalized heart failure, CVD death), all-cause mortality and T2DM (diagnostic codes or prescription of antidiabetics). The risk of outcomes was estimated using Cox proportional hazards with adjustment for deciles of TCPS and imbalanced patient characteristics after matching.

Results: The study included 1768 statin initiators and 3528 non-users for CVD/mortality; 3608 statin initiators and 7208 non-users for T2DM (Figure). Baseline characteristics of the statin initiators and non-users in the matched cohort were balanced except for DM, some medications and prior cerebrovascular disease (Table 1). Among 1768 statin initiators and 3528 non-users, 63 vs. 340 CVD (3.0/100 person-years [PY] vs. 2.7/100 PY) and 62 vs. 525 deaths (2.7/100 PY vs. 4.1/100 PY) occurred, respectively (Table 2). Incident T2DM was noted in 128 of 3608 statin initiators (3.0/100 PY) and 518 of 7208 non-users (2.0/100 PY). Statin initiation was associated with 32% (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) reduction in CVD, 54% (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.60) reduction in all-cause mortality, and 33% increase in T2DM (HR= 1.33, 95% CI 1.09-1.63) risks. Number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent a CVD and mortality in 1-year was 102 and 42, respectively. Number needed to harm (NNH) for a new T2DM was 127. Patients with and without prior CVD had similar CVD (36% vs. 34%) and mortality (62% vs. 54%) reduction with statins (Table 2).

Conclusion: Statins are associated with important reductions in CVD and mortality in both primary and secondary CVD prevention, with a modest increase in T2DM risk in RA patients. The resulting NNT/NNH suggest that CVD/mortality benefits of statins outweigh T2DM risk.

Figure. Overview of the study design and cohort creation for outcomes of cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of propensity score matched cohorts

Table 2. Association between statin initiation and CVD, all-cause mortality and T2DM


Disclosures: G. Ozen, None; S. Dell’Aniello, None; S. Pedro, FORWARD, the National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, 3; K. Michaud, None; S. Suissa, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ozen G, Dell’Aniello S, Pedro S, Michaud K, Suissa S. Reduction of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality versus Risk of New Onset Diabetes with Statin Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reduction-of-cardiovascular-disease-and-mortality-versus-risk-of-new-onset-diabetes-with-statin-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reduction-of-cardiovascular-disease-and-mortality-versus-risk-of-new-onset-diabetes-with-statin-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology