ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0535

Provider Opinion and Support for Shared Decision-making in Gout Treatment: A Quality Improvement National Survey of Veterans Affairs Rheumatologists

Jasvinder Singh1, John Richards2, Elizabeth Chang3, Toupin-April, Karine Toupin-April4 and Jennifer Barton5, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Phoenix VA Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix, AZ, 4VA Portland Oregon, Portland, OR, 5Oregon University, Portland, OR

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Decision analysis, gout, Patient reported outcomes, quality of care, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster II: OA, Osteoporosis, & Other Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To assess rheumatologists’ views and practices related to shared decision making (SDM) in gout treatment.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional electronic survey of rheumatologists at U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, assessing views and practices related to SDM in gout.

Results: Of the 154 VA rheumatology providers eligible, 90 responded (response rate, 58%). Fifty-eight percent were female, the mean age was 51 years (standard deviation, 9.6), 42% had >20 years of experience in medical practice (Table 1).

Rheumatologists reported routinely offering a choice to their patients for: (1) starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for gout vs. doing nothing (70%); (2) choosing NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or colchicine for the treatment of acute flares (67%); and (3) choosing NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or colchicine for anti-inflammatory prophylaxis when starting ULT (51%; Appendix 1). Very few rheumatologists offered choice regarding: (4) choosing allopurinol vs. febuxostat as the first ULT (16%); and (5) taking daily ULT long-term vs. intermittently (15%).

Rheumatologists perceived that large proportion of patient were often or sometimes unsure of the best choice for these five decisions, respective proportions were 34%, 76%, 76%, 52%, and 54%. Similar proportions were often or sometimes uninformed about both medication benefits and risks, unclear about the personal importance of the benefits and risks, and unsupported in decision-making (Table 2). The rheumatologists reported that 44-64% of the patients were uninformed about both benefits and risks, 52-73% were unclear about the personal importance of the benefits and risks, and 36-52% were unsupported in decision-making (Table 2).

Conclusion: The majority of VA rheumatologists incorporated SDM in several gout treatment decisions. Rheumatologists also recognized that patients need better support to participate in SDM in gout.

Table 1. Characteristics of survey respondents (n=90 providers)

Appendix 1. Provider practices for choice for the patient regarding gout treatment decisions

Table 2. Provider view of patient difficulties and their role in shared decision-making (SDM) process in gout


Disclosure: J. Singh, Crealta/Horizon, 1, Medisys, 1, Fidia, 1, UBM LLC, 1, Trio health, 1, Medscape, 1, WebMD, 1, Clinical Care options, 1, Clearview healthcare partners, 1, Putnam associates, 1, Focus forward, 1, Navigant consulting, 1, Spherix, 1, Practice Point communications, 1, the National Institutes of Health, 1, the American College of Rheumatology, 1, Amarin pharmaceuticals, 1, Viking therapeutics, 1, OMERACT, 1; J. Richards, None; E. Chang, None; T. Toupin-April, None; J. Barton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Singh J, Richards J, Chang E, Toupin-April T, Barton J. Provider Opinion and Support for Shared Decision-making in Gout Treatment: A Quality Improvement National Survey of Veterans Affairs Rheumatologists [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/provider-opinion-and-support-for-shared-decision-making-in-gout-treatment-a-quality-improvement-national-survey-of-veterans-affairs-rheumatologists/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/provider-opinion-and-support-for-shared-decision-making-in-gout-treatment-a-quality-improvement-national-survey-of-veterans-affairs-rheumatologists/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology