ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1130

Patient Perspectives on Biobanking and Data-linkage for Rheumatic Disease Research

Abhishikta Dey1, Marita Cross2, Tom Lynch3, Carlos El-Haddad4 and Lyn March5, 1NSW Rheumatology Advanced Trainee, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 3A3BC, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 4Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 5Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Qualitative Research, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II: Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The causes of arthritis and autoimmune conditions remain unknown. A complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors is thought to underlie these diseases. Prospective collection of blood, saliva and stool samples from patients will be necessary for identifying biomarkers which may play critical roles in predicting, managing and preventing arthritis and autoimmune conditions.

Biobanking refers to the collection, storage and distribution of human biospecimens and linked health data for research. Engagement with patients and the public is required for the success of biobanking endeavours.

To our knowledge there are no qualitative studies investigating the attitudes of patients with rheumatic conditions towards biobanking and data-linkage. This is of importance for us as we, like a growing number of countries globally, develop a national biobank for rheumatic conditions in Australia. Our aim is to explore participants’ knowledge, attitudes, perspectives and beliefs regarding the process of biobanking and data-linkage to national health statistics in the context of their illness.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted between October 2019 and April 2020. Ethics approval was granted by Northern Sydney Local Health District Ethics Committee (2019/ETH11659). Adult patients with rheumatic conditions were invited to participate in focus groups or semi-structured phone interviews. Patients were recruited via rheumatology clinics from a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. 

Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were moderated according to a question guide which was informed by current literature. Recruitment ceased when no new themes emerged.

The collection, analysis and interpretation of data was an iterative process using grounded theory underpinned by the health belief model. Data was entered into computerised data management program (NVivo 12) where further refinement occurred.

Results: There were fifteen participants, their characteristics are summarised in Table 1, nine of fifteen were women, the mean age was 55.7years (range 27 – 76), majority of patients had rheumatoid arthritis (11/15) and the average disease duration was 15.1years (range 0.33 – 62 years). Four main themes arose including knowledge of biobanking and data-linkage, perceived barriers, perceived benefits and attitudes towards biobanking. Table 2 shows illustrative quotes from the interviews and figure 1 provides a diagrammatic representation of the identified themes.

Conclusion: Knowledge of biobanking varied significantly amongst Australian patients with rheumatic conditions. Although there were many perceived risks to participation, the majority of participants in this study were willing to accept these risks and engage with biobanking research. We hypothesise that this willingness to participate was influenced by the relevance of the biobank’s objective to their own condition, perceived benefits in helping themselves, their families, future generations and their trusted clinicians. This study should inform patient information and frequently asked questions when developing recruitment strategies for rheumatic disease biobanks.

Table 1. Participant characteristics

Table 2. Illustrative quotes for the identified themes

Figure 1. Thematic schema Our participants had varied knowledge of biobanking and data-linkage. Although there were many perceived barriers, as illustrated in the schema, participants’ attitudes towards participations were generally supportive and we hypothesise this is likely due to the perceived benefits of helping themselves, their families, society and giving back to their clinicians.


Disclosure: A. Dey, None; M. Cross, None; T. Lynch, None; C. El-Haddad, None; L. March, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dey A, Cross M, Lynch T, El-Haddad C, March L. Patient Perspectives on Biobanking and Data-linkage for Rheumatic Disease Research [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perspectives-on-biobanking-and-data-linkage-for-rheumatic-disease-research/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-perspectives-on-biobanking-and-data-linkage-for-rheumatic-disease-research/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology