ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1255

Lung Transplantation Outcomes for Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Compared to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Single Institution Multisite Experience

Reena Yaman1, Lisa Balistreri2, Maximiliano Diaz Menindez3, Sehreen Mumtaz1, Megan Sullivan3, Alexander Hochwald1 and Florentina Berianu1, 1Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 2Lee Health, Cape Coral, FL, 3Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Cohort Study, interstitial lung disease, Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases, Outcome measures, pulmonary

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1248–1271) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Pulmonary disease is present in most sarcoidosis cases with up to 10% of patients progressing to advanced lung disease.1 Pulmonary sarcoidosis accounted for 2.5% of lung transplants in 2015. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a much more common indication for lung transplantation.2 Post-transplant outcomes for both indications are presumed to be comparable.1,2 The current study evaluates the experience and outcomes across multiple sites at a single institution.

Methods: All lung transplants occurring at any site between July 2017 and March 2023 were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were performed and compared between pulmonary sarcoidosis and IPF indications via Kruskal-Wallis and Fischer’s Exact tests. Survival and pulmonary function test results were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios were used for survival comparison.

Results: Lung transplantation outcomes for 13 cases of sarcoidosis were compared to 26 age- and gender-matched IPF cases. The most common computed tomography pattern was usual interstitial pneumonia (61.5%) in the IPF group compared to undefined pattern (38.5%) in the sarcoidosis group. Baseline characteristics were otherwise comparable (Table 1). A higher proportion of sarcoidosis patients had improved post-transplant forced vital capacity compared to IPF patients although this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 1). Survival plateaued at 75% in both groups after 5 years with hazard ratio 0.56 (p=0.49) (Figure 2).

Conclusion: Lung transplantation is a feasible treatment strategy for pulmonary sarcoidosis and demonstrated comparable outcomes to IPF in this cohort. Rheumatologists treating sarcoidosis can therefore benefit from familiarity with current lung transplantation referral guidelines, disease-specific indications and contraindications, and multidisciplinary collaboration.Kim JS, Gupta R. Lung transplantation in pulmonary sarcoidosis. J Autoimmun. 2023;149:103135. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103135Yusen RD, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-second official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report—2015; focus theme: early graft failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(10):1264-1277. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2015.08.014

Supporting image 1Table 1. Baseline (pre-transplant) characteristics of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis groups. Statistically significant differences are designated by an asterisk (*).

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Forced vital capacity (FVC) pre- and post-transplant compared between sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) groups. FVC scores were categorized as normal (>80%), mildly reduced (60-80%), moderately reduced (50-60%), and severely reduced ( < 50%). Missing data points were excluded from proportion calculations. Differences were not statistically significant.

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrating comparable post-transplant survival between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (red) and sarcoidosis (blue) groups.


Disclosures: R. Yaman: None; L. Balistreri: None; M. Diaz Menindez: None; S. Mumtaz: None; M. Sullivan: None; A. Hochwald: None; F. Berianu: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yaman R, Balistreri L, Diaz Menindez M, Mumtaz S, Sullivan M, Hochwald A, Berianu F. Lung Transplantation Outcomes for Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Compared to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Single Institution Multisite Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lung-transplantation-outcomes-for-pulmonary-sarcoidosis-compared-to-idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis-a-single-institution-multisite-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lung-transplantation-outcomes-for-pulmonary-sarcoidosis-compared-to-idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis-a-single-institution-multisite-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology