ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1687

IgG and IgA anti-LIN28A Outperform Anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm in Distinguishing SLE from Health and Other Autoimmune Diseases

Ioannis Parodis1, Dionysis Nikolopoulos2, Julius Lindblom3, Denis Lagutkin3, Lorenzo Beretta4, Maria Orietta Borghi5, Janique Peyper6, Guillermo Barturen7, Per-Johan Jakobsson3, Marta Alarcon-Riquelme8, Natalia Sherina3 and Helena Idborg9, and PRECISESADS Clinical Consortium, 1Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital; Örebro University, Solna, Sweden, 2Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di MIlano, Milan, Milan, Italy, 5Università degli Studi di Milano Statale, Milano, Italy, 6Sengenics Corporation Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore, 7Center for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Andalusia, Spain, 8Fundación Progreso y Salud, Andalusian Government, Granada, Spain, 9Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Autoantibody(ies), proteomics, Sjögren's syndrome, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Abstracts: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes II: Biomarkers

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterised by the production of a multitude of autoantibodies (abs). The diagnosis of SLE is supported by the presence of certain abs; however, currently used abs either demonstrate high sensitivity across connective tissue diseases (e.g., ANA) or high specificity yet low sensitivity (e.g., anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm). To improve diagnostic procedures and prognostication, identification of better biomarkers of early and accurate SLE diagnosis is imperative. Our objective was to perform a broad screen of IgG and IgA antibodies to autoantigen specificities in SLE versus primary Sjögren’s disease (SjD), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and healthy controls (HC) to identify novel abs that potentially could aid in differentiating SLE from HC and other diseases.

Methods: We analysed plasma samples from patients with SLE (n=229), SjD (n=146), SSc (n=139) and 196 matched HC from the European PRECISESADS project (NTC02890121). Samples were screened for IgG and IgA seroreactivity against a panel of 1,609 protein autoantigens using KREX-based i-Ome arrays (Sengenics). Measurement of IgG anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibody levels was conducted using an automated chemiluminescent immunoanalyser (IDS-iSYS). Analysis of differentially abundant abs (DAabs) was performed with the limma R package after adjustments for age, gender, and polyspecific antibody reactivity. The level of significance was set at p< 0.05 and |fold change| >1.5. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out for each DAab, yielding sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and accuracy.

Results: Among
1,609 autoantigens, levels of both IgG and IgA abs against LIN28A, a protein that regulates cellular growth and differentiation that is currently linked with cancer progression, were significantly elevated in SLE compared with SjD, SSc, and HC. Specifically, IgG anti-LIN28A was elevated in SLE compared with HC (sen=0.77, spe=0.69, AUC=0.80), SjD (sen=0.71, spe=0.75, AUC=0.78), and SSc (sen=0.67, spe=0.84, AUC=0.81). Moreover, IgA anti-LIN28 was elevated in SLE compared with HC (sen=0.65, spe=0.83, AUC=0.80), SjD (sen=0.59, spe=0.82, AUC=0.76), and SSc (sen=0.61, spe=0.91, AUC=0.83). By contrast, anti-LIN28A antibody levels were not significantly elevated in SjD versus HC (logFC=0.07, p=0.22 for IgG and logFC=0.08, p=0.21 for IgA) or in SSc versus HC (logFC=-0.02, p=0.95 for IgG and logFC=-0.04, p=0.50 for IgA). Anti-LIN28A outperformed anti-dsDNA (sen=0.31, spe=1.00 across all comparisons) and anti-Sm (sen=0.04, spe=1.00 across all comparisons) in distinguishing SLE from HC (AUC=0.65 for anti-dsDNA and AUC=0.52 for anti-Sm), SLE from SjD (AUC=0.65 for anti-dsDNA and AUC=0.52 for anti-Sm), and SLE from SSc (AUC=0.64 for anti-dsDNA and AUC=0.52 for anti-Sm).

Conclusion: Anti-LIN28A demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity in distinguishing SLE from healthy individuals and other autoimmune diseases. Both IgG and IgA anti-LIN28A outperformed anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm in diagnostic metrics. Exploration of the role of LIN28A in SLE pathogenesis is warranted. Upon validation in other cohorts, determination of anti-LIN28A could aid in improving diagnostics in SLE.


Disclosures: I. Parodis: Amgen, 5, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 6, Aurinia, 1, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 1, 2, Otsuka Pharma, 1, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6; D. Nikolopoulos: None; J. Lindblom: None; D. Lagutkin: None; L. Beretta: None; M. Borghi: None; J. Peyper: Sengenics, 3; G. Barturen: None; P. Jakobsson: None; M. Alarcon-Riquelme: None; N. Sherina: None; H. Idborg: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Parodis I, Nikolopoulos D, Lindblom J, Lagutkin D, Beretta L, Borghi M, Peyper J, Barturen G, Jakobsson P, Alarcon-Riquelme M, Sherina N, Idborg H. IgG and IgA anti-LIN28A Outperform Anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm in Distinguishing SLE from Health and Other Autoimmune Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/igg-and-iga-anti-lin28a-outperform-anti-dsdna-and-anti-sm-in-distinguishing-sle-from-health-and-other-autoimmune-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/igg-and-iga-anti-lin28a-outperform-anti-dsdna-and-anti-sm-in-distinguishing-sle-from-health-and-other-autoimmune-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology