ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0674

Disease Control of Hyperuricemia Newly Detected by Medical Check-up: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Health Insurance Claims Data in Japan

Ruriko Koto1, Akihiro Nakajima1, Hideki Horiuchi1 and Hisashi Yamanaka2, 1Teijin Pharma Limited, Tokyo, Japan, 2Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Epidemiology, gout, hyperuricemia, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Japanese guidelines for managing gout and hyperuricemia recommend the initiation of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) to prevent gouty arthritis in subjects having asymptomatic hyperuricemia with serum uric acid (sUA) ≥8.0 mg/dL under certain conditions [Yamanaka H. Japan Med Assoc J. 2012;55:324-9.]. This is a distinctive difference from policies in Europe and the US. However, we lack clear documentation of the extent of clinical treatment for asymptomatic hyperuricemic subjects and of correlations between such treatment and the prevention of gouty arthritis. This study evaluated the association between disease control, defined as the relationship among prescription of ULT, occurrence of gouty arthritis, and level of sUA after 1 year, and gouty arthritis in subjects with asymptomatic hyperuricemia newly detected at medical check-up.

Methods: This research is based on Japanese health insurance claims and medical check-up data from April 2012 through June 2019. We identified subjects who had sUA ≥8.0 mg/dL in one or more medical check-ups from April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2016. The earliest available measurement date during that period was considered the index date. Subjects of analysis were health insurance subscribers whose records did not show the disease name of “gout” or “asymptomatic hyperuricemia” and for whom ULT had not been prescribed during the 1-year period prior to the index date. From the index date to the medical check-up 1 year later (follow-up date) was considered Period 1, and from the day after the follow-up date was considered Period 2. Disease control was investigated during Period 1, and disease burden (incidence rate of gouty arthritis) was assessed in relation to disease control during Period 2 (Figure 1).

Results: The analysis population consisted of 19,261 health insurance subscribers who met the eligibility criteria. During Period 1, ULT was initiated in 8.4% of that group (1,625 /19,261). Gouty arthritis was experienced by 3.1% (597/19,261), of whom 32.3% (193/597) were not under treatment with ULT. For 90.6% (17,443/19,261), no ULT was prescribed and no gouty arthritis was experienced during Period 1. Within that group, 40.4% (7,049/17,443) showed sUA ≥8.0 mg/dL on the follow-up date. Only 2.3% (438/19,261) had been prescribed ULT and had achieved sUA ≤6.0 mg/dL by the follow-up date (Figure 2). During Period 2, the incidence rate of gouty arthritis was calculated for each type of disease control assessed during Period 1. Both for asymptomatic hyperuricemia and for gout in subjects who had experienced at least one incident of gouty arthritis during Period 1, the incidence rate of gouty arthritis during Period 2 was lower in subjects who had sUA ≤6.0 mg/dL than in those whose sUA was >6.0 mg/dL, with or without ULT (Figure 3).

Conclusion: Of those subscribers with newly detected hyperuricemia according to medical check-up records, only 2.3% had been prescribed ULT and had achieved sUA ≤6.0 mg/dL for the 1-year period. Both for asymptomatic hyperuricemia and for gout, the incidence rate of gouty arthritis was lower in subjects whose sUA was ≤6.0 mg/dL than those whose sUA was >6.0 mg/dL, with or without ULT. Further analysis by adjusting for confounding will be required to discuss causality.

Figure 1 Study design * Disease control: Relationships among prescription of ULT, occurrence of gouty arthritis, and level of sUA after 1 year † Incidence rate of gouty arthritis sUA, serum uric acid; ULT, urate-lowering therapy

Figure 2 Event tree analysis of disease control from index date to follow-up date (Period 1) Parentheses indicate the number of subjects. For percentages, the denominator was 19,261 subscribers. sUA, serum uric acid; ULT, urate-lowering therapy

Figure 3 Incidence rate of gouty arthritis during Period 2 Parentheses indicate the number of subjects. Brackets indicate the number of flares/person-years. * Subjects who had experienced at least one incident of gouty arthritis during Period 1. sUA, serum uric acid; ULT, urate-lowering therapy


Disclosure: R. Koto, Teijin Pharama Limited, 3; A. Nakajima, Teijin Pharma Limited, 3; H. Horiuchi, Teijin Pharma Limited, 3; H. Yamanaka, Teijin Pharma Limited, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Koto R, Nakajima A, Horiuchi H, Yamanaka H. Disease Control of Hyperuricemia Newly Detected by Medical Check-up: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Health Insurance Claims Data in Japan [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-control-of-hyperuricemia-newly-detected-by-medical-check-up-a-retrospective-cohort-study-of-health-insurance-claims-data-in-japan/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/disease-control-of-hyperuricemia-newly-detected-by-medical-check-up-a-retrospective-cohort-study-of-health-insurance-claims-data-in-japan/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology