ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0219

COVID-19 Impact on Second Year Medical Students Experience with Interactive Patient Encounters as a Supplement to Teaching the Skin and Rheumatology Course

Emily Littman1, Jeremy Adamson2 and Shazia Beg3, 1UCF College of Medicine, Boca Raton, FL, 2UCF College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, 3UCF, Orlando, FL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Education, education, medical, education, patient

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Professional Education Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The use of interactive patient scenarios has long been a valuable component of medical school curricula, as this type of learning facilitates empathy, comprehensive understanding, and cultural sensitivity. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, has precipitated a shift to more virtual strategies to keep students, faculty, and patients safe. We evaluated second year medical students’ perceptions on the use of live patient encounters during the teaching of the skin and rheumatology course (BMS 6635) using different teaching formats due to changes from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Four to five patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, dermatomyositis, scleroderma, and pyoderma gangrenosum volunteered to participate in an interactive teaching session with medical students at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine (UCF COM). Second year medical students enrolled in BMS 6635 were asked to complete a survey about their learning experiences using these patient cases. Participation was voluntary. Students who did not respond to the survey questions were excluded. Data analysis using Chi Square testing was performed on survey responses obtained pre-pandemic as compared to those collected in academic years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: 700 surveys were obtained after patient cases given in different formats. When the interactive patient cases were given in person before COVID-19, 93% of students enjoyed the cases and 95% of students believed that the cases were an appropriate learning experience in their education. When these cases were delivered virtually beginning in the academic year 2020-2021, however, students’ enjoyment of these cases decreased to 86%, with 92% of students believing that the cases were an appropriate learning experience in their education. This is a 7% and 9% decrease, respectively, from pre-pandemic years. During the academic year 2021-2022, use of a hybrid model, with students and faculty in-person and patients participating virtually, resulted in 81% of students enjoying the interactive patient cases and 83% of students believing that the cases were an appropriate learning experience in their education. This was a 12% decrease from before the COVID-19 pandemic (p < .001) and a 5% and 9% decrease, respectively, from the previous year (p < .001) (Figure 1). 37% of students who had their cases in a completely virtual format preferred the interactive patient sessions to stay completely virtual, while 51% of students who participated in hybrid sessions during COVID-19 preferred the sessions to be completely virtual (p< .029) (Table 1).

Conclusion: The use of live interactive patient cases in medical school education has been met with positive feedback over the years. As such, these interactive case strategies should continue to be used in medical education. This study showed that medical students had a decrease in enjoyment when changed to a completely virtual format and an even further decrease when changed to a hybrid format. Careful consideration should be given to delivery format to optimize student learning and enjoyment.

Supporting image 1

Table. 1 Medical student survey responses comparing live patient encounters given in person, completely virtually, and a hybrid format.
* = Statistical significance defined as p<0.05.

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Medical students’ feedback on live patient cases given in different platforms before COVID_19 and during the COVID_19 pandemic.


Disclosures: E. Littman, None; J. Adamson, None; S. Beg, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Littman E, Adamson J, Beg S. COVID-19 Impact on Second Year Medical Students Experience with Interactive Patient Encounters as a Supplement to Teaching the Skin and Rheumatology Course [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/covid-19-impact-on-second-year-medical-students-experience-with-interactive-patient-encounters-as-a-supplement-to-teaching-the-skin-and-rheumatology-course/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/covid-19-impact-on-second-year-medical-students-experience-with-interactive-patient-encounters-as-a-supplement-to-teaching-the-skin-and-rheumatology-course/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology