ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2026
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR Convergence 2024

Abstract Number: 1076

Assessing the Reliability of ChatGPT on Recombinant Zoster Vaccination for Patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases

Akhil Sood, Pegah Jahangiri, Amanda Moyer and Janice Lin, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Clinical practice guidelines, education, medical, education, patient, informatics

Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: As artificial intelligence (AI) platforms continue to evolve, large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT by OpenAI are increasingly being utilized by patients and healthcare providers as a source of health information. However, it is crucial to consider the advantages and limitations of such platforms. The objective of the study is to assess the accuracy and completeness of responses generated by ChatGPT compared to validated information resources on recombinant Zoster vaccination in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, twenty prompts derived from three validated sources of information on recombinant Zoster vaccine were entered into ChatGPT 3.5. The sources included: 1) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with information from both ‘What Everyone Should Know’ and ‘Healthcare Professionals’ sections; 2) guideline recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP); and 3) the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). These guidelines were framed as questions and inputted as prompts into ChatGPT. The responses generated by ChatGPT were assessed for accuracy (5-Point Likert Scale 1 – completely incorrect to 5 – completely correct) and completeness (3-Point scale 1-incomplete to 3-complete) in comparison with the validated information source by five rheumatologists. Scores of accuracy and completeness of the ChatGPT responses were listed descriptively and compared between information sources using non-parametric testing.

Results: The overall mean accuracy on a 5-point scale was 4.04 +/- 1.22, with 80% of responses scoring ≥ 4. The mean completeness score on a 3-point scale was 2.3 +/-0.63, with 95% of responses scoring ≥2. ChatGPT responses to prompts based on ACIP recommendations scored highest in accuracy (Mean 4.5 +/- 0.71) and completeness (Mean 2.4+/-0.70). It scored lowest in accuracy (Mean 3.6+/- 1.37) and completeness (Mean 2.2 +/- 0.65) to prompts based on ACR guidelines. There were no significant differences in accuracy or completeness when comparing ChatGPT responses between information sources (Kruskal-Wallis p-value > 0.05).

Conclusion: ChatGPT 3.5 is a reliable LLM that can accurately and comprehensively answer specific questions regarding recombinant Zoster vaccine for patients with RMDs. However, responses may deviate from evidence-based guidelines. ChatGPT responses should be interpreted with caution. As LLMs evolve, it is essential to ensure that information from multiple validated sources is built into the AI model.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Descriptive statistics of accuracy and completeness scores of ChatGPT responses by information source

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Boxplot showing the distribution of accuracy scores of ChatGPT responses by information source

Supporting image 3

Figure 2: Boxplot showing the distribution of completeness scores of ChatGPT responses by information source


Disclosures: A. Sood: None; P. Jahangiri: None; A. Moyer: None; J. Lin: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sood A, Jahangiri P, Moyer A, Lin J. Assessing the Reliability of ChatGPT on Recombinant Zoster Vaccination for Patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-reliability-of-chatgpt-on-recombinant-zoster-vaccination-for-patients-with-rheumatic-and-musculoskeletal-diseases/. Accessed .

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-reliability-of-chatgpt-on-recombinant-zoster-vaccination-for-patients-with-rheumatic-and-musculoskeletal-diseases/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology