ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2146

Effects Of Chondroitin Sulfate On Brain Response To Painful Stimulation In Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Jordi Monfort1, Jesús Pujol2, O Contreras-Rodriguez2, Jone Llorente-Onaindia2, M López-Solà2, Laura Blanco-Hinojo2, J Deus2, H Ortiz2, Francisco Montañés3, M Campillo2, Pere Benito2, Laura Sánchez4, Marta Herrero5 and Josep Vergés6, 1Reumatologia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 3Rhaumatology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, 4Bioiberica, Barcelona, Spain, 5Pharmascience Division, Bioiberica S.A., Barcelona, Spain, 6Pre-Clinical R&D Area, Pharmascience Division, BIOIBERICA S.A., Barcelona, Spain

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: chondroitin, Knee, Neuroimaging, osteoarthritis and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Symptoms and Therapeutics in Osteoarthritis.

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease causing symptoms in 12% of people over the age of 65 . A variety of treatments have been tested to alleviate knee OA symptoms, most being focused on reducing pain through analgesic or anti-inflammatory actions. Clinical studies have reported a beneficial effect of pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulfate (CS) on knee pain, and a parallel  reduction in the rate of decline in joint space width. Nevertheless, not all clinical trials have been successful  and reports exist suggesting that CS is not equally effective in all clinical situations (Clegg 2006) . Inherent problems with efficacy assessment of pain medication are the lack of objective pain measurements and the large variability of subjective pain ratings. The aim of the present fMRI study was to objectively identify the effects of CS treatment on the brain response to pressure painful stimulation in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: Phase IV, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in which patients received CS (pharmaceutical-grade manufactured by Bioibérica) 800 mg/day or placebo for a 4-month treatment course. Patients were assessed at baseline and after four-month of treatment. Two fMRI tests were conducted in each session by applying painful pressure on the knee medial interline (pain sensitive maneuver) and on the patella surface (cartilage selective targeting). The main outcome measurement was attenuation of the response evoked by knee painful stimulation in the pain-processing brain system.

Results: Twenty-two evaluable patients received CS and 27 placebo. No  effects of CS were detected using the knee interline pressure test. Patients receiving CS showed a tendency to report reduced subjective pain after treatment during patella pressure test (p=0.077), but no significant group by session interaction was demonstrated. fMRI of patella pain, showed a larger activation reduction in the CS group than in placebo in a posterior mesencephalon region including the periaqueductal gray (PAG). The entire PAG cluster (238 voxels) with significant interaction showed a pre>post-treatment difference at p<0.05 (peak difference at x=-10, y=-34, z=-16; t= 2.4, p= 0.007). In this paired analysis, the CS group showed significant activation reduction in the primary somatosensory cortex (including the cortical representation of the leg) and extending to the primary motor cortex and posterior supplementary motor area. Group by session interaction consistently revealed a tendency for this cortical change to be larger in the CS than in placebo (peak interaction x=2, y=-6, z=72; t=2.96, p= 0.002 and 43 voxels -subthreshold- with p<0.01).

Conclusion:  fMRI was sensitive to objectify CS effects on brain response to knee painful stimulation. The current work yields further support to the utility of fMRI to objectify treatment effects on OA pain. The positive treatment effect of CS on brain was identified on pain elicited by pressure on patellofemoral cartilage, where the cartilage component of pain is a relevant factor. This result  is consistent with the known CS mechanisms of action and the results obtained in previous clinical trials.


Disclosure:

J. Monfort,
None;

J. Pujol,
None;

O. Contreras-Rodriguez,
None;

J. Llorente-Onaindia,
None;

M. López-Solà,
None;

L. Blanco-Hinojo,
None;

J. Deus,
None;

H. Ortiz,
None;

F. Montañés,
None;

M. Campillo,
None;

P. Benito,
None;

L. Sánchez,

Bioiberica,

3;

M. Herrero,

Bioiberica,

3;

J. Vergés,

Bioiberica,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-chondroitin-sulfate-on-brain-response-to-painful-stimulation-in-knee-osteoarthritis-patients-a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-clinical-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology