ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0136

Sarcoidosis Incidence After mTOR Inhibitor Treatment

Matthew Baker1, Emese Vágó2, Yuhan Liu1, Rong Lu1, Suzanne Tamang3, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó2 and Henrik Sørensen2, 1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 3Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences, Redwood City, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, Cohort Study, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Epidemiology, Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are effective in animal models of granulomatous disease, but their benefit in patients with sarcoidosis is unknown. We evaluated the incidence of sarcoidosis in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors versus calcineurin inhibitors.

Methods: This was a cohort study using the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (2003-2019), IBM® MarketScan® Research Database (2006-2016), and Danish health and administrative registries (1996-2018). Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 year continuous enrollment before and after a kidney, liver, heart, or lung transplant treated with an mTOR inhibitor or calcineurin inhibitor were included. Patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis before, or up to 90 days after, transplant were excluded. Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated and reported as the number of sarcoidosis events per 1,000 person years, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mid-p exact test.

Results: In the Optum/MarketScan cohort, 1,898 patients were treated with an mTOR inhibitor (mean age 49 years; 34% female) and 9,894 patients were treated with a calcineurin inhibitor (mean age 50 years; 37% female) (Table 1). The mean follow-up in the mTOR inhibitor group was 1.1 years, with no incident sarcoidosis diagnosed. In the calcineurin inhibitor group, the mean follow-up was 2.2 years, with 12 incident cases of sarcoidosis diagnosed (Table 2). Patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors were more likely to receive mycophenolate mofetil (85.5% versus 43.5%) and azathioprine (6.3% versus 3.0%) than patients receiving mTOR inhibitors. The median dose of prednisone in the calcineurin inhibitor group was 11.7 mg/day compared with 5.8 mg/day in the mTOR inhibitor group (p< 0.001). In the Danish cohort, 230 patients were treated with an mTOR inhibitor (mean age 49; 45% female), with no incident sarcoidosis diagnosed (Table 3 and Table 2). There were 3,411 patients treated with a calcineurin inhibitor (mean age 45; 40% female), with 10 incident cases of sarcoidosis diagnosed (Table 3 and Table 2). The length of follow-up was shorter in the mTOR inhibitor group (median of 3.3 years) compared with the calcineurin inhibitor group (median of 7.8 years). Patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors were more likely to receive prednisone (47% versus 31%) than patients receiving mTOR inhibitors. The median dose of prednisone was also higher in the calcineurin inhibitor group (2.0 mg/day) compared with the mTOR inhibitor group (1.2 mg/day) (p< 0.685).

Conclusion: We observed a lower incidence of sarcoidosis in solid organ transplant patients receiving mTOR inhibitors compared with patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors. Results from this study further support preclinical data and case reports demonstrating that mTOR inhibitors may provide therapeutic benefit in patients with sarcoidosis. Future interventional studies with mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of sarcoidosis could be considered.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: M. Baker, None; E. Vágó, None; Y. Liu, None; R. Lu, None; S. Tamang, None; E. Horváth-Puhó, None; H. Sørensen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baker M, Vágó E, Liu Y, Lu R, Tamang S, Horváth-Puhó E, Sørensen H. Sarcoidosis Incidence After mTOR Inhibitor Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sarcoidosis-incidence-after-mtor-inhibitor-treatment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sarcoidosis-incidence-after-mtor-inhibitor-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology