ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1277

Why Did You Choose That Score? – Associations Between Patient Global Assessment Scores and Mental Health in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Inna Powers1, Sonja Ziniel2, Jeanelle Sheeder3, Jessica Bloom4 and Brian Pitts1, 1University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, 2University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 3University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aurora, CO, 4University of Colorado, Denver, CO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Anxiety, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, mental health, Pediatric rheumatology, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatic disease in childhood significantly alters a child’s quality of life. The patient global assessment (PGA) score is a clinical and research tool that measures the impact of disease on a patient’s quality of life on a scale of 0 (no impact) to 10 (high impact). Rheumatologists apply these scores in real time to aid in clinical management. Previous studies have shown a discrepancy between the PGA and objective disease activity measures. This study aims to explore patients’ self-reported reasons for their PGA score, and the role of anxiety and depression in particular.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional, single-center, survey-based study. A total of 71 patients 12-18 years old with JIA or SLE were recruited and administered a survey including the PGA, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) and Screen for Childhood Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED). A follow up survey was sent four weeks after initial screening to request feedback on the shared materials and assess patient comfort in the screening process. Associations with high (≥3) and low (< 3) PGA scores and mental health scores and reasons for selecting a PGA were analyzed using appropriate nonparametric tests. A Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to look at the relationship of the PGA to other variables.

Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled during the study period. Twenty-seven patients had clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and 16 had moderate or worse depression. 54.9% of all patients self-indicated feeling anxious, stressed or sad as a reason for their chosen PGA score. Patients with PHQ9≥10 or SCARED≥25 were more likely to select those reasons for their PGA than those with lower/negative PHQ9/SCARED screener scores. In contrast, patients with clinically active disease were more likely to attribute swollen joints and inability to participate in sports to their PGA. Those with significant depression had a higher median PGA score of 4.5 (2.5-7, p = 0.009), than those without depression. Most patients (87%) who responded to a feedback survey felt that it was somewhat or very helpful to get resources about mental health in rheumatology clinic and 95.7% felt that it was helpful to talk to their rheumatologist about emotions and mood.

Conclusion: Anxiety and depression influence how many children with rheumatic disease view the impact of their disease on their quality of life. Patients with clinically significant symptoms of depression and anxiety were more likely to have higher PGA scores and attribute their PGA score to trouble sleeping, feeling stressed about their disease, feeling anxious, feeling sad/depressed, having to take too many medications, and inability to participate in sports/activities than patients without anxiety, reporting a worse experience of their rheumatic disease, regardless of disease activity. These are important factors to consider when applying PGA scores in research studies. Moving forward, the community must develop efficient ways to better understand the reason behind a child’s PGA score within the rheumatology clinic setting.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: I. Powers: None; S. Ziniel: None; J. Sheeder: None; J. Bloom: None; B. Pitts: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Powers I, Ziniel S, Sheeder J, Bloom J, Pitts B. Why Did You Choose That Score? – Associations Between Patient Global Assessment Scores and Mental Health in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/why-did-you-choose-that-score-associations-between-patient-global-assessment-scores-and-mental-health-in-patients-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/why-did-you-choose-that-score-associations-between-patient-global-assessment-scores-and-mental-health-in-patients-with-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-and-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology