ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2619

What Works? A Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Guided Exploration of Patient Safety in Rheumatology Practices

Catherine Nasrallah1, Cherish Wilson2, Christine Hariz3, Alicia Hamblin4, Cammie Young5, gabriela Schmajuk6 and Jinoos Yazdany4, 1University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, 2UCSF / SFVA, San Francisco, CA, 3University of California San Francisco (UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 4UCSF, San Francisco, CA, 5University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, 6University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Measurement, Qualitative Research, quality of care, registry, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality (2615–2620)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-4:15PM

Background/Purpose: Despite widespread recognition of persistent patient safety challenges in the U.S. health care system, the development of feasible and scalable solutions has lagged, particularly for ambulatory patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies. In this qualitative study we interviewed stakeholders across a diverse group of rheumatology practices to identify barriers and facilitators of high performance on four national patient safety measures, including screening for Hepatitis B and Tuberculosis prior to initiating immunosuppressive therapy, recommended Hydroxychloroquine dosing, and osteoporosis assessment for high-risk populations.

Methods: We identified 139 practices participating in the ACR’s RISE registry with above-average performance on ≥1 of the 4 patient safety measures for interviews. Since RISE practices are largely community-based, we also invited 6 academic (AMCs) and 5 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Rheumatologists and key staff members involved in patient safety measure workflows were invited to take part in virtual semi-structured interviews. Guided by the concepts of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using deductive and inductive techniques to generate themes.

Results: We conducted 19 interviews with 21 participants across 11 RISE practices, 5 AMCs, and 3 VAs. Participants included 11 rheumatologists, 6 practice managers, 2 pharmacists, 1 nurse, and 1 quality and compliance manager (Table 1). Practices described several innovative workflows that supported high performance on quality measures. These included standardized screening protocols and safety monitoring tools, often incorporating EHR-based alerts, integrated screening data, performance dashboards, and customized EHR fields for documentation. High performance was commonly attributed to clinicians’ strong commitment to patient safety, ongoing staff training on clinical guidelines, and interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly with pharmacists (Table 2). Respondents also identified persistent challenges including inefficient workflows for repatriating external lab data, inconsistent or missing documentation of screening information in structured EHR fields, non-standardized workflows and logistical difficulties in tracking the implementation and performance of safety measures (Table 3).

Conclusion: This study provided critical insights into key barriers and facilitators affecting rheumatology practices’ performance on patient safety measures. Qualitative interviews revealed strategies associated with higher performance on safety measures, such as EHR-supported protocols and collaboration with pharmacists, but also highlighted challenges like inefficient workflows for data entry and data integration issues. These findings have laid the foundation for the development of the Rheum Safe Patient Safety Toolkit, currently in development. The toolkit will guide RISE practices in implementing patient safety measures and optimizing workflows for scalable and sustained improvement.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: C. Nasrallah: None; C. Wilson: None; C. Hariz: None; A. Hamblin: None; C. Young: None; g. Schmajuk: None; J. Yazdany: AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 5, Gilead, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nasrallah C, Wilson C, Hariz C, Hamblin A, Young C, Schmajuk g, Yazdany J. What Works? A Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Guided Exploration of Patient Safety in Rheumatology Practices [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-works-a-consolidated-framework-for-implementation-research-guided-exploration-of-patient-safety-in-rheumatology-practices/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/what-works-a-consolidated-framework-for-implementation-research-guided-exploration-of-patient-safety-in-rheumatology-practices/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology