ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0686

Use of a Smartphone App which Incorporates Feedback to Patients to Monitor Systemic Sclerosis-related Digital Ulcers – a Potential New Tool for Remote Clinical Monitoring

Ariane Herrick1, Paul New2, Graham Dinsdale3, Andy Vail2, Joanne Manning3, Michael Hughes4, Will dixon5, Chris Taylor5, Mark Dickinson5 and Andrea Murray6, 1The University of Manchester, UK, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 2The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom, 4Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, Manchester, England, United Kingdom, 5The University of Manchester, Manchester, 6University of Manchester, Salford, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: hand, Measurement, Patient reported outcomes, Systemic sclerosis, Ulcers

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0671–0710) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: To facilitate clinical trials we previously developed a smartphone app to allow ‘tracking’ of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related digital ulcers (DUs) and their associated pain and disability, via capture of a combination of photographs and patient reported outcome measures [PROMS]. Members of the patient user group who informed the study felt that the app might be helpful in routine clinical care, as this could provide a means of their clinician viewing the ulcer(s), and assessing treatment response, remotely, thus reducing the need for hospital visits. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of using the app in a clinical setting, and to gauge patient opinion of its benefits, including a newly added lesion feedback function for patients.

Methods: Patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria for SSc and who had active DUs were recruited either face-to-face or remotely. Study design throughout was informed by the patient user group. Participants were assessed twice: on study entry (when they downloaded the app on to their own smartphone and were trained in its use) and at the point of DU healing. Participants were asked to image their lesions and record PROMs (including pain score) with the app twice weekly. Specifically for this study a lesion feedback function was added to the app, showing lesion size (measured from the photographs) over time (Figure 1). Feasibility was assessed by the number of patients who elected to participate, by the number of photographs and PROMS recorded via the app, by patient questionnaire feedback (Table 1), and by verbal feedback during patient user group meetings.

Results: Of the 22 patients assessed for eligibility, 10 were recruited: 9 (90%) female, median age (range) 55 (36-74) years, median disease duration (range) 11.6 (1.7-29.7) years. Nine (90%) completed the study. One patient consented for a second time (therefore 10 ‘DU episodes’ were included). Of the 12 patients not recruited, 2 were about to have DU surgery, in 6 the DU had almost healed, and 4 were not interested. The median duration of study participation per DU episode was 39 days (range 18-140). In total, 210 images were returned, median (range) 12 (4-87) per episode from 10 DU episodes. and 101 pain scores returned out of a possible total of 144 (70%). Patient questionnaire feedback is summarised in Table 1: most patients found the app very easy to use, feedback was very helpful, and all were keen to use the app again. One participant required help from someone else to take the photographs, and one patient used a tripod. The patient with most difficulties reported ‘cracked skin’ and limited hand mobility. The 4 patients attending the final user group meeting confirmed feasibility, and made suggestions about ‘next steps’, including feedback on DU size being expressed as percentage change.

Conclusion: 1. Using the smartphone app was feasible for most patients despite the hand function problems of SSc.2. Patients found the feedback function helpful in gauging ‘progress’ of the DU.3. Our findings lend support to wider use of the app in routine clinical practice, thus allowing remote DU monitoring (facilitating early identification of clinical deterioration) and reducing the need for hospital attendance for many patients.

Supporting image 1Figure 1 – Example of a lesion feedback graph sent to patients during the study. The ulcer size on the vertical axis is plotted against the date/time stamp of the image from which it was derived

Supporting image 2Table 1 – Responses to the post-study questionnaire from the 10 ‘episodes’ from the 9 participants who completed the study


Disclosures: A. Herrick: Abbvie, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Janssen, 2, 6, Zura Bio, 2; P. New: None; G. Dinsdale: None; A. Vail: None; J. Manning: None; M. Hughes: Janssen, 5, 6, UCB, 5; W. dixon: None; C. Taylor: None; M. Dickinson: None; A. Murray: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Herrick A, New P, Dinsdale G, Vail A, Manning J, Hughes M, dixon W, Taylor C, Dickinson M, Murray A. Use of a Smartphone App which Incorporates Feedback to Patients to Monitor Systemic Sclerosis-related Digital Ulcers – a Potential New Tool for Remote Clinical Monitoring [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-a-smartphone-app-which-incorporates-feedback-to-patients-to-monitor-systemic-sclerosis-related-digital-ulcers-a-potential-new-tool-for-remote-clinical-monitoring/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-a-smartphone-app-which-incorporates-feedback-to-patients-to-monitor-systemic-sclerosis-related-digital-ulcers-a-potential-new-tool-for-remote-clinical-monitoring/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology