ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0207

Upadacitinib Monotherapy in Methotrexate-naïve Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results at 72 Weeks

Ronald van Vollenhoven1, Tsutomu Takeuchi2, Maureen Rischmueller3, Ricardo Blanco4, Ricardo Xavier5, Mark Howard6, Alan Friedman6, Yanna Song7 and Vibeke Strand8, 1Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan, 3The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Univ of Adelaide, St Peters, South Australia, Australia, 4Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 5Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 6AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 7AbbVie Inc., North Chicago,, IL, 8Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: clinical trial, immunology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: RA Treatments & Their Safety

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor, demonstrated significant improvements in signs, symptoms, and structural inhibition as monotherapy vs methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) of MTX-naive RA patients (pts) through 48 weeks (wks).1 We present the safety and effectiveness of UPA through 72 wks in an ongoing long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-EARLY RCT.

Methods: SELECT-EARLY included 2 study periods: (1) a 48-wk double-blind, active comparator-controlled, with pts randomized to UPA monotherapy 15 or 30 mg once daily or MTX (titrated to 20 mg/wk by Wk8); (2) an LTE, up to 4 years. Pts received open-label treatment once the last pt reached Wk48. Rescue therapy was added (MTX, for UPA groups; UPA, for MTX group) to pts not achieving CDAI remission (≤2.8) at Wk26. Non-responder imputation (NRI) was used for missing data as well as for pts receiving rescue therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are summarized per 100 pt yrs (PY) through the cut-off date of 21 Feb 2019, when all pts had reached Wk72. Data are censored at the time of MTX or UPA addition among rescued patients.

Results: Of 945 pts randomized and treated, 781 (83%) completed Period 1. Of these, 775 entered the LTE, including 57 rescued pts (MTX, 33; UPA 15 mg, 17; UPA 30 mg, 7). A total of 52 (7%) pts discontinued during the LTE through the cut-off date (primary reasons: AEs [n=16, 2.1%]; consent withdrawal [n=12, 1.5%]; lost to follow-up [n=10, 1.3%]). Cumulative exposures to monotherapy with MTX, UPA 15 mg, and UPA 30 mg were 350.6, 389.5, and 383.9 PYs, respectively. Both UPA 15 mg and 30 mg as monotherapy was associated with continued statistically significant improvements in disease activity measures vs MTX monotherapy observed at Wk 24, and maintained responses through 48 and 72 wks (Table). The safety profiles of the UPA 15 and 30 mg groups were comparable for total TEAEs and numerically higher than MTX. Serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were comparable across all groups (Figure). Most AEs of special interest were comparable across MTX and UPA groups, with the exception of higher rates of herpes zoster, opportunistic infections, and elevated creatine phosphokinase among the UPA groups. Two pts receiving MTX monotherapy experienced a venous thromboembolic event, with one event reported on UPA 30 mg and none on UPA 15 mg. There were 12 deaths (including 3 non-treatment-emergent) due to varied causes.

Conclusion: Long-term UPA monotherapy was associated with maintained improvements in RA signs and symptoms vs MTX monotherapy through 72 wks, and only a small proportion of pts required MTX addition at Wk26. Through 72 wks of treatment, the safety profile of UPA monotherapy remained consistent with data reported through 48 wks.1

References:
       1. van Vollenhoven R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78(S):376.
           Original abs: Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(S1):330.


Disclosure: R. van Vollenhoven, AbbVie, 2, 5, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, 8, Biotest, 2, 5, Celgene, 5, Janssen, 5, 8, Roche, 5, Biogen, 5, Galapagos, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, Servier, 5; T. Takeuchi, Astellas Pharma Inc., 2, 5, 8, Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited, 2, 5, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie GK., 2, 5, 8, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, 2, 5, 8, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 2, 5, 8, Eisai Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8, Eli Lily Japan K.K, 2, 5, 8, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Japan, Inc., 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, 5, 8, Novartis Pharma K.K., 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Dainippon Sumitomo Co., 2, 5, 8, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 2, 5, 8; M. Rischmueller, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; R. Blanco, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8; R. Xavier, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5; M. Howard, AbbVie, 1, 3; A. Friedman, AbbVie, 1, 2; Y. Song, AbbVie, 1, 2; V. Strand, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Celltrion, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Novartis, 5, Regeneron, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5, Genentech/Roche, 5, GSK, 5, Pfizer, 5, Bayer, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Galapagos, 5, Lilly, 5, Gilead, 5, Samsung, 5, Servier, 5, Setpoint, 5, Arena, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Horizon, 5, Ichnos, 5, Inmedix, 5, Sandoz, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Rischmueller M, Blanco R, Xavier R, Howard M, Friedman A, Song Y, Strand V. Upadacitinib Monotherapy in Methotrexate-naïve Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results at 72 Weeks [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/upadacitinib-monotherapy-in-methotrexate-naive-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-at-72-weeks/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/upadacitinib-monotherapy-in-methotrexate-naive-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-at-72-weeks/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology