ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 941

Treatment of Lupus Nephritis with anti-CD20 Followed by Anti-BAFF: Impact on B Cell Reconstitution, B Cell Subsets, and Autoreactivity

Yemil Atisha Fregoso1, Susan Malkiel 2, Kristina Harris 3, Sai Kanaparthi 3, Margie Byron 4, Linna Ding 5, Dawn Smilek 6, David Wofsy 7, Maria Dall'Era 8, Cynthia Aranow 1 and Betty Diamond 9, 1Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, 2Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, 3Immune Tolerance Network, Bethesda, 4Rho Federal Systems, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, 5National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 6Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA, 7UCSF, San Francisco, 8University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 9Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: belimumab and B cell targeting, clinical trials, Lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S110: SLE – Clinical III: Clinical Trials II (939–944)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Despite the relevance of B cells in lupus, two clinical trials of anti-CD20 failed to meet primary endpoints in patients with lupus and lupus nephritis (LN). One explanation is that after treatment with anti-CD20, BAFF levels are elevated, which may favor survival and expansion of pathogenic autoreactive B cells. The CALIBRATE study (NCT 02260934) was designed to determine whether addition of anti-BAFF (belimumab) could enhance the clinical and biological effects of anti-CD20 (rituximab), and to assess safety of the combination.

Methods: Forty-three patients with active LN despite conventional treatment were enrolled in a prospective randomized open-label trial that compared two regimens. All subjects received iv rituximab (1000 mg), CYC (750 mg), and methylprednisolone (100 mg) at wks 0 and 2, followed by 40 mg/d prednisone with taper to 10 mg/d by wk 12. At wk 4, subjects were randomized to belimumab (10 mg/kg iv at wks 4, 6, 8 and then every 4 wks) plus prednisone (RCB, n=21) or prednisone alone (RC, n=22) to wk 48. After wk 48, patients received only prednisone. Complete response (CR) was defined as: (i) urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 0.5; (ii) eGFR ≥ 120 or, if < 120, eGFR >80% of screening; and (iii) prednisone dose of 10 mg/d. Partial response (PR) differed only in the UPCR criterion ( >50% reduction). B cell populations and autoreactive B cells (ANA+ B cells) from peripheral blood were analyzed in Per Protocol (PP) samples as previously described (Arthritis Rheum 2016;68:2210) at wk 0, 24, 48 and 60

Results: B cell depletion occurred in both groups by wk 12. Partial reconstitution was observed in the RC group by wk 24 compared to the RCB group.  B cells counts in the RCB group remained lower at wk 60, 12 wks after belimumab was discontinued (Figure 1). In both groups, the proportion of transitional B cells was increased compared to baseline at all time points. Proportions of naïve B cells decreased and switched memory B cells increased in the RCB group compared to the RC group, and these differences persisted after belimumab was discontinued (Figure 2). In both groups, the proportion of ANA+ transitional cells in the B cell compartment was increased at wk 48.  In contrast, the proportion of ANA+ naive cells was increased in the RC group and decreased in the RCB group (Figure 3).

At wk 48, CR was 38% in the RCB group and 32% in the RC group; overall response (CR+PR) was 52% in the RCB group compared to 41% in the RC group (p-ns).  Five subjects in the RC group and 2 in the RCB group experienced grade 3 or higher infectious adverse events, and all resolved. At wk 48, in PP patients, median IgG levels remained within the normal range in both groups. Resolution of hypocomplementemia and positive anti-DNA antibody status was not statistically different between groups.

Conclusion: Treatment with anti-BAFF following anti-CD20 was not associated with increased risk of infections or adverse events. The sequential treatment impaired B cell reconstitution, altered proportions of B cell subpopulations, and decreased the relative proportion of autoreactive ANA+ naïve cells in circulating B cells. In this phase 2a study, addition of anti-BAFF did not significantly improve clinical outcome.

Figure 1. B cell counts in Per Protocol Sample

Figure 2. Relative Proportions of B Cell Subpopulations Differ Between RC v. RCB Subjects in Per Protocol Sample

Figure 3. Proportions of ANA+ transitional and Naïve B cells in RC v. RCB Subjects in Per Protocol Sample


Disclosure: Y. Atisha Fregoso, None; S. Malkiel, None; K. Harris, None; S. Kanaparthi, None; M. Byron, None; L. Ding, None; D. Smilek, None; D. Wofsy, Celgene, 5, Genentech, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, 5, Novartis, Principia, 5; M. Dall'Era, Biogen,, 5, Genentech, 5, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Pfizer, 5; C. Aranow, EMD Serrono, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Janssen, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, Inc, 2, Xencor, 2; B. Diamond, GSK, 5, Jansen, 5, Lilly, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Atisha Fregoso Y, Malkiel S, Harris K, Kanaparthi S, Byron M, Ding L, Smilek D, Wofsy D, Dall'Era M, Aranow C, Diamond B. Treatment of Lupus Nephritis with anti-CD20 Followed by Anti-BAFF: Impact on B Cell Reconstitution, B Cell Subsets, and Autoreactivity [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-lupus-nephritis-with-anti-cd20-followed-by-anti-baff-impact-on-b-cell-reconstitution-b-cell-subsets-and-autoreactivity/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-lupus-nephritis-with-anti-cd20-followed-by-anti-baff-impact-on-b-cell-reconstitution-b-cell-subsets-and-autoreactivity/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology