ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1160

Treatment Intensity and Impact on Bone Lesion Evolution and Distribution Patterns in Severe Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis

Aleksander Lenert1, T. Shawn Sato2, Sedat G Kandemirli1, Patrick Ten Eyck1 and Polly Ferguson3, 1University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 2University of Iowa, Iowa City, 3University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Autoinflammatory diseases, comparative effectiveness, longitudinal studies, Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases, Pediatric rheumatology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster II: Systemic JIA, Autoinflammatory, & Scleroderma

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To compare bone lesion evolution and bone lesion distribution patterns identified by whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) by treatment intensity in patients with chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO).

Methods: We performed an IRB-approved observational study of previously collected data from a large longitudinal CRMO cohort at the University of Iowa. We extracted detailed demographic, clinical, treatment and imaging data in patients with biopsy-proven CRMO who have undergone ≥2 serial WB-MRIs between 2014-2019. WB-MRIs were reviewed by two pediatric radiologists with expertise in imaging of CRMO. Bone lesions were characterized for anatomic location and lesion evolution on serial scans; specifically, we identified the total number of unique lesions on initial and follow-up scans, as well as fully resolved lesions at the final scan. We stratified our CRMO cohort into four treatment groups based on a hierarchical therapy approach reflective of clinical practice at our institution. We defined the active treatment groups at the time of the initial WB-MRI scan. The four groups were: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) group (defined as active NSAID use only); synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) group (defined as active sDMARD ± NSAID); biological DMARD group (defined as active bDMARD ± sDMARD ± NSAID); and bisphosphonate group (defined as active bisphosphonate use ± bDMARD ± sDMARD ± NSAID). Descriptive statistics were used to compare the 4 treatment intensity groups.

Results: The findings of our study are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. In our CRMO cohort (n=51), the majority of patients belonged to the bisphosphonate group (n=28), followed by NSAID (n=10), bDMARD (n=8) and sDMARD (n=5) groups respectively (Table 1). Mean age, sex distribution and mean follow-up time were overall similar across groups, except for younger age and higher proportion of females in the sDMARD group. Prior systemic glucocorticoid use was similar, except less frequent in the NSAID group. Patients in the bisphosphonate group had the highest total and mean (per patient) number of bone lesions identified on WB-MRI (Table 1). Additionally, the mean number of bone lesions per patient was ~4x higher on initial and ~8x higher on follow-up imaging in the bisphosphonate group compared to the three non-bisphosphonate groups. The bone lesion distribution pattern in the bisphosphonate group most frequently involved the lower extremity (LE), spine and pelvis; this group had the highest spine burden compared to other groups (Table 2). Peripheral (upper extremity and LE), medial clavicular and pelvic bone lesions, without spine involvement, were a common pattern observed in the NSAID, bDMARD and sDMARD groups. The proportion of resolved bone lesions on follow-up imaging was highest in the bisphosphonate group, followed by bDMARD group.

Conclusion: Treatment-stratified bone lesion evolution and distribution patterns reflect the severity of CRMO and current management strategies. Further study to elucidate differential treatment effects on individual bone lesions is needed to individualize therapeutic approaches in patients with severe CRMO.  


Disclosure: A. Lenert, None; T. Sato, None; S. Kandemirli, None; P. Ten Eyck, None; P. Ferguson, NIH/NIAMS R01AR059703, 1, Novartis, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lenert A, Sato T, Kandemirli S, Ten Eyck P, Ferguson P. Treatment Intensity and Impact on Bone Lesion Evolution and Distribution Patterns in Severe Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-intensity-and-impact-on-bone-lesion-evolution-and-distribution-patterns-in-severe-chronic-recurrent-multifocal-osteomyelitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-intensity-and-impact-on-bone-lesion-evolution-and-distribution-patterns-in-severe-chronic-recurrent-multifocal-osteomyelitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology