ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0645

Time Burden of QTc Screening for HCQ Users at a Single VA Rheumatology Clinic

Iziegbe Ehiorobo1, Anna Montgomery2 and Gabriela Schmajuk1, 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Department of Veterans Affairs, Tiburon, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Heart disease, Qualitative Research, risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster (0623–0659)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a commonly used medication in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. New guidance from the ACR supports routine monitoring of the QT interval among HCQ users, especially in patients at higher risk for QT prolongation, in order to avoid potentially fatal events related to Torsade de Pointes. We assessed the time burden of implementing routine QTc monitoring for patients receiving HCQ in a single VA rheumatology clinic.

Methods: We identified patients receiving HCQ within the past year at our institution. Using chart review, we determined the date of the most recent ECG, the associated QTc interval, and whether it was abnormal (QTc > 450 ms for men and > 470 ms for women). We extracted information about other risk factors for QT prolongation, cardiac, renal, and endocrine comorbidities, and the use of other potential QT-prolonging medications. We implemented an algorithm (Figure 1) for when to order or repeat the ECG or place an e-Consult to cardiology. The total time taken to perform each step for each patient was documented, including time for chart review; follow up of newly ordered ECG and consults ordered was not included.

Results: There were a total of 117 HCQ users at our institution, 96% were men, with mean (SD) age 67(13); most patients were using HCQ for the treatment of RA (see Table 1). 100 out of 117 (85.4%) had an ECG previously documented in the chart, with 30 out of 117 (25.6%) with an ECG performed within the last year. Out of 100 patients with an ECG, 24% had a prolonged QTc on the automated ECG read. Most patients with recent ECGs were using other QT-prolonging medications (63.3%); this proportion was higher in those with a prolonged QTc (70.5%). We executed the algorithm in Figure 1 for a subset of HCQ users, including those without any documented ECG (N=17); those with an ECG within the past year (N=30); and those with remote ECGs with a prolonged QTc (N=7), as these were the highest risk patients. We spent 4.1 (1.0) min for patients without any documented ECG; 9.3 (4.8) minutes for patients with a recent (< 1 year) ECG, and 4.7 (0.7) minutes for patients with remote ECGs that were abnormal (Table 2).

Conclusion: The time burden of implementing routine QTc monitoring for patients receiving HCQ in a single VA rheumatology clinic was about 6 minutes per HCQ user in this high-risk clinic population. Consultation with cardiology will result in confirmation of the automated ECG findings followed by a discussion of possible strategies to reduce the risk related to a prolonged QTc, including possible discontinuation of HCQ or other QT-prolonging medications. We plan to incorporate the additional time required to follow up updated ECG reports and recommendations from cardiology into these estimates as these data enter the chart. Future guideline development groups should compare the potential benefits of new recommendations to the time burden and other costs of implementation.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients on San Francisco Veteran cohort on HCQ (N = 117)

Table 2. Average time spent executing the algorithm in Figure 1 to implement routine QTc monitoring for patients receiving HCQ in a single clinic

Figure 1: Flow chart depicting a process for implementing routine ECG monitoring patients receiving hydroxychloroquine.


Disclosures: I. Ehiorobo, None; A. Montgomery, None; G. Schmajuk, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ehiorobo I, Montgomery A, Schmajuk G. Time Burden of QTc Screening for HCQ Users at a Single VA Rheumatology Clinic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/time-burden-of-qtc-screening-for-hcq-users-at-a-single-va-rheumatology-clinic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/time-burden-of-qtc-screening-for-hcq-users-at-a-single-va-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology