ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0934

The Use Of Preclinical Models To Understand Drivers Of Lupus Pathogenesis

Arielle Glatman Zaretsky1, Carley Tasker1, Pablo Abreu1, Ciara Torres2, Li-Hong Ben1, Scott MacDonnell1, Andre Limnander1 and Jamie Orengo1, 1Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, 2Regeneron, Tarrytown

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Animal Model, B-Lymphocyte, interferon, Mouse Models, Lupus, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (0934–0954) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Animal Models Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 1.4-15.13/100,000 adults globally. SLE is highly heterogenous and can involve dysregulation of the adaptive and innate arms of the immune system, leading to aberrant lymphocyte activation, autoantibodies, immune complex formation, and/or organ damage. Notably, clinical benefit has been demonstrated in subsets of lupus patients. Thus, it is critical to appropriately model disease and differentiate disease drivers in relevant preclinical models, allowing better stratification of patient subsets for the development of effective therapeutics and opening the door for new target discovery.

Methods: Two mouse models of lupus-like disease were evaluated: NZB/W lupus prone mice and C9orf72-deficient mice, which display a lupus-like phenotype previously described to include elevated autoantibodies and circulating cytokines, glomerulonephropathy, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Profiling of immune populations and serological readouts was performed over time using age matched female WT, NZB/W, and C9orf72 KO animals. Overexpression of IFNα via hydrodynamic DNA delivery (HDD) was used to evaluate the role of IFNα in these strains, while TACI-Ig-mediated B cell depletion was performed to determine the contribution of B cells to pathogenesis.

Results: The respective contributions of IFNa and BAFF, representing pathways with approved targeted therapeutics in SLE, were evaluated and analyzed between these strains. Systemic low dose IFNα synchronizes and significantly accelerates disease progression across NZB/W animals, while disease progression in C9orf72-/- mice is unaltered by overexpression of IFNα. These data suggest that lupus-like disease in NZB/W mice can be exacerbated by IFNα and thus may model patients for whom Type I IFN is a key driver of disease. Although disease in C9orf72-/- is unchanged by IFNα, overexpressing TACI-Ig to bind and sequester BAFF and APRIL in the C9orf72-deficient lupus model reversed lupus-associated phenotypes. TACI-Ig-mediated depletion of BAFF/APRIL in C9orf72-/- resulted in a decrease in B cells and a rapid reduction in anti-dsDNA antibodies. These data indicate that the C9orf72-/- model captures the dysregulated B cell tolerance pathways that can drive disease in some subsets of lupus patients.

Conclusion: Here we describe two models of SLE-like disease that respond differently to manipulation of key pathways targeted by existing approved therapeutics. Taken together, these data suggest that NZB/W and C9orf72-/- mice recapitulate distinct disease mechanisms relevant to human patients and can be used in preclinical efforts to validate therapeutic strategies for a heterogeneous SLE patient population.


Disclosures: A. Glatman Zaretsky: Regeneron, 3, 11; C. Tasker: Regeneron, 3, 11; P. Abreu: Regeneron, 3, 11; C. Torres: Regeneron, 3, 11; L. Ben: Regeneron, 3, 11; S. MacDonnell: Regeneron, 3, 11; A. Limnander: Regeneron, 3, 11; J. Orengo: Regeneron, 3, 3, 11, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Glatman Zaretsky A, Tasker C, Abreu P, Torres C, Ben L, MacDonnell S, Limnander A, Orengo J. The Use Of Preclinical Models To Understand Drivers Of Lupus Pathogenesis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-preclinical-models-to-understand-drivers-of-lupus-pathogenesis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-preclinical-models-to-understand-drivers-of-lupus-pathogenesis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology