ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2896

The Role of Alterations in the Splicing Machinery in the Pathogenesis of Lupus: Does It Impact Lupus Nephritis?

Chary Lopez-Pedrera1, Alejandro Ibañez-Costa 1, Mª Ángeles Aguirre-Zamorano 2, Laura Pérez-Sanchez 3, Alejandra Patiño-Trives 1, Maria Luque-Tevar 1, Maria del Carmen Abalos-Aguilera 1, Ivan Arias de la Rosa 4, Nuria Barbarroja 5, Mario Espinosa 6, Eduardo Collantes-Estevez 4, Justo Castaño 7, Raúl Luque 7 and Carlos Perez-Sanchez 8, 1IMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital/University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain, 2IMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital/University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain, 3MIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital/University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain, 4University of Cordoba/IMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital, Cordoba, Spain, 5University of Cordoba/IMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital and CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cordoba, Spain, 6UGC de Nefrología. Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain, 7Maimónides Institute for Biomedical Research at Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain, 8Rheumatology service, IMIBIC/Reina Sofia Hospital/University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain, Cordoba, Spain

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-dsDNA, Basic Science and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Biomarkers, Lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Title: 6W022: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis II (2894–2899)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether alterations in the splicing machinery of immune cells could influence the development and activity of the disease and the kidney involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

Methods: Monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils from 43 SLE patients and 34 healthy donors (HD) were purified by immunomagnetic selection. Then, 45 selected elements of the splicing machinery and a set of 48 genes related to inflammation, renal and cardiovascular disease (including interleukins, adipocytokines, chemokines, and oxidative stress markers, among others) were evaluated using a microfluidic qPCR array (Fluidigm). In parallel, an extensive clinical/serological evaluation was performed, comprising renal and CV involvement along with autoantibodies, and inflammatory molecules. Correlation and association studies and logistic models among those clinical and analytical parameters were developed. Separately, mechanistic in vitro studies were carried out by incubation of HD-leukocytes with purified anti-dsDNA-IgG from SLE patients.

Results: Altered expression of spliceosome components was demonstrated in the 3 leukocyte subsets: 29, 13 and 22 components were differentially expressed in monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils, respectively, vs HD. Intriguingly, any spliceosome component was commonly deregulated among the three leucocyte subsets except for PRPB8, a key component of the spliceosome, that acts as a scaffold protein essential for spliceosome assembly.

Correlation studies demonstrated multiple links among altered spliceosome components and the score of disease activity along with a number of inflammatory and oxidative stress mediators. Remarkably, the levels of those altered components were associated to the presence of lupus nephritis in the three leukocyte subsets. Moreover, we could build different logistic models to precisely identify patients with renal involvement, which integrated the concomitant alteration of: RNU12, RNU4ATAC and RNU6ATAC, in monocytes; RNU4, SRRM1 and U2AF2 in lymphocytes; and PRPF8, SF3B1 and KHDRBS1 in neutrophils.

On the other hand, a logistic model combining RNU6, CELF1 and RAVER1 could classify anti-dsDNA positivity in lymphocytes, thus suggesting the involvement of these autoantibodies in the splicing process. Finally, in vitro treatment of HD lymphocytes with anti-dsDNA promoted the decrease of several spliceosome components found altered in vivo in SLE lymphocytes, such as KHDRBS1, SRSF5 and TRA2B.

Conclusion: 1) The splicing machinery is profoundly altered in leukocytes from SLE patients and closely related to the development and activity of the disease. 2) Evaluation of specific components of the spliceosome in leukocytes subsets might be used to clinically typify kidney involvement. Ongoing studies would clarify the physiological implications of these findings, which may provide novel diagnostic-biomarkers and therapeutic-tools to treat SLE.

Funded by ISCIII, PI18/00837 and RIER RD16/0012/0015 co-funded with FEDER


Disclosure: C. Lopez-Pedrera, None; A. Ibañez-Costa, None; M. Aguirre-Zamorano, None; L. Pérez-Sanchez, None; A. Patiño-Trives, None; M. Luque-Tevar, None; M. Abalos-Aguilera, None; I. Arias de la Rosa, None; N. Barbarroja, None; M. Espinosa, None; E. Collantes-Estevez, None; J. Castaño, None; R. Luque, None; C. Perez-Sanchez, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lopez-Pedrera C, Ibañez-Costa A, Aguirre-Zamorano M, Pérez-Sanchez L, Patiño-Trives A, Luque-Tevar M, Abalos-Aguilera M, Arias de la Rosa I, Barbarroja N, Espinosa M, Collantes-Estevez E, Castaño J, Luque R, Perez-Sanchez C. The Role of Alterations in the Splicing Machinery in the Pathogenesis of Lupus: Does It Impact Lupus Nephritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-role-of-alterations-in-the-splicing-machinery-in-the-pathogenesis-of-lupus-does-it-impact-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-role-of-alterations-in-the-splicing-machinery-in-the-pathogenesis-of-lupus-does-it-impact-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology