ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 254

The Relationship Of Foot Pronation During Walking To Risk Of Incident Medial Tibiofemoral and Lateral Patellofemoral Cartilage Damage: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

K. Douglas Gross1, Howard J. Hillstrom2, Yuqing Zhang1, Emily K. Quinn3, Michael C. Nevitt4, Neil A. Segal5, Cora E. Lewis6 and David T. Felson1, 1Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Rehabilitation, Hospital Special Surgery (HSS), New York, NY, 3Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University, Boston, MA, 4Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF (University of California, San Francisco), San Francisco, CA, 5Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 6Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: foot, gait and osteoarthritis, Knee

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Risk Factors for and Sequelae of Osteoarthritis.

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Studies of older adults suggest an association between plantar pressure measures of foot pronation and medial tibiofemoral (med TF) cartilage damage, while studies of younger adults suggest an association with lateral patellofemoral (lat PF) pain. These were cross-sectional studies, however. We assessed the longitudinal relationship of foot pronation in walking with 2-year risk of incident med TF and lat PF cartilage damage in at-risk older adults.

Methods: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) includes adults aged 50-79 years that have or are at risk of knee OA. At the 60 month exam, plantar pressure was assessed using an EmedX to quantify Center of Pressure Excursion Index (CPEI) during 5 trials of self-paced walking (14-day retest ICC > 0.82). Smaller CPEI values indicate increased pronation. From 1.0 T MRIs obtained at 60 and 84 months readers scored one knee per subject for cartilage damage in each sub-region comprising the med TF and lat PF compartments using WORMS grades (weighted kappa > 0.63). Among sub-regions with WORMS < 2 at 60 months, incident cases had WORMS ≥ 2 at 84 months. With the highest quintile (least pronated feet) as a reference, separate logistic regression models estimated relative odds of incident med TF and lat PF damage in each case-based CPEI quintile while adjusting for age, BMI, sex, and using GEE to account for non-independent sub-regions of a compartment.

Results: 1123 participants (mean age 66.8 ± 7.5 yrs, BMI 29.7 ± 4.8 kg/m2, 62.4% female) contributed one knee each (mean CPEI 19.8 ± 6.6) to the analysis of med TF damage, while 904 participants with similar characteristics contributed to the analysis of lat PF damage. Only 3.6% and 2.6% of sub-regions had incident med TF and lat PF damage, respectively. Although relative odds of lat PF damage were increased (OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 0.72, 5.82) among the most pronated feet (CPEI 13.7 to -7.7), pronation was not strongly associated with odds of med TF damage (see table). With few incident cases contributing, no findings achieved statistical significance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: In the first longitudinal data on foot pronation and risk of knee cartilage damage, we cannot confirm cross-sectional findings of an association between excessive pronation and med TF disease. Yet, this data does suggest a possible association between extreme foot pronation and elevated risk of lat PF damage. Studies with higher incidence rates are needed to confirm this.

 


Disclosure:

K. D. Gross,
None;

H. J. Hillstrom,

JAK Tool,

5;

Y. Zhang,
None;

E. K. Quinn,
None;

M. C. Nevitt,
None;

N. A. Segal,
None;

C. E. Lewis,
None;

D. T. Felson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relationship-of-foot-pronation-during-walking-to-risk-of-incident-medial-tibiofemoral-and-lateral-patellofemoral-cartilage-damage-the-multicenter-osteoarthritis-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology