ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2923

The Effects of Disease Activity and Mood Disorders on Cognitive Function in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Michelle Barraclough1,2, Rebecca Elliott2,3, Shane McKie2,3, Ben Parker1,2 and Ian N. Bruce1,2, 1Stopford Building, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Central Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Stopford Building, Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Brain and Behaviour and Mental Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Cognitive dysfunction, depression and fMRI, Disease Activity, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Cognitive
dysfunction (CD) significantly affects SLE patients with many contributing
causal factors. The effect of disease activity on cognitive function remains
unclear and currently there is no definitive measure for CD in SLE. Functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provides a sensitive measure of brain
functionality during cognitive tasks. The limited studies using fMRI in SLE
have shown that SLE patients employ compensatory brain mechanisms to maintain
adequate cognitive function. The aim of this study is to investigate fMRI as a
potential biomarker for CD in SLE and examine other factors that affect CD in
SLE.

Methods:

Data
from 12 healthy controls (HC), 9 SLE patients with active disease (SLE-F) and 15
stable SLE patients (SLE-S) were analysed. SLE patients met ACR 1997 criteria. Basic
demographic, disease and mood variables were collected. We also performed two
fMRI tasks; the n-back (working memory task) and the facial emotional recognition
task (FERT). The n-back had three levels (0-, 1-, and 2- back) with the 2-back being
the most difficult. The FERT displayed faces expressing different emotions:
happiness, sadness, fear and neutral. Both tasks were preprocessed and modelled
using SPM12. The out of scanner variables and region of interest (ROI) data
extracted from the fMRI tasks were analysed using SPSS 22.

Results:

Participants
were matched on demographic and clinical variables except for the SLEDAI score
and steroid dose where, as expected, the SLE-F group scored higher. The SLE-F
patients had significantly higher depression scores than the SLE-S and HC. The
FERT mean results for the amygdala (sad vs neutral condition) were significantly
different  when comparing all SLE participants to the HC group. The n-back task
showed a significant difference in the blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD)
response for the 2- vs 0-back condition in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), with
an increased response for the SLE-F group compared to the other two groups.

Conclusion:

We
found an increased BOLD response using the n-back in the MFG but only in the
SLE-F group. This combined with the FERT amygdala result suggests that CD in
SLE is affected by both disease activity and mood disorders. Functional MRI
biomarkers may help differentiate features of CD in SLE patients related to disease
activity and aid better targeting of relevant pathways for interventions in
this condition.    

This independent research is funded by Genzyme in the context of
the ISS Program.

 

Table 1: Group comparisons of demographic, disease and mood variables

Variable

SLE-F (n=9)

Mean (SD)

Median (IQR)

SLE-S (n=15)

Mean (SD)

Median (IQR)

HC (n=12)

Mean (SD)

Median (IQR)

Test statistic

Post hoc – significant results

Demographics

Age (yrs)*

39 (20.5, 48.5)

40 (33.3, 50.8)

36 (32.3, 49.5)

H(2) = 1.71, p=0.42

n/a

Sex (% female)

100

100

100

n/a

n/a

Handedness (% right-handed)

78

81

92

χ2 (2) = 0.86, p=0.65

 

Disease

Disease duration (yrs)

8.56 (4.53)

13.00 (8.08)

n/a

F(1, 23) = 2.29, p=0.14

n/a

ACR criteria ever

7.11 (1.27)

5.94 (1.44)

n/a

F(1, 23) = 4.16, p=0.05

n/a

SLEDAI-2K

5.78 (3.53)

1.50 (1.59)

n/a

F(1, 23) = 17.62, p<0.001

n/a

Steroid dose (mg)*

5 (20)

0 (3.8)

0

H(2) = 9.385, p=0.01

HC vs SLE-F

Mood

BDI score*

22 (13, 26.5)

7.5 (0, 11.8)

1 (0, 3.8)

H(2) = 15.85, p<0.001

HC vs SLE-F

SLE-S vs SLE-F

MADRS*

9.5 (2.8, 13.5)

1 (0, 5.5)

1 (1, 0)

H(2) = 8.55, p=0.01

HC vs SLE-F

*Post-hoc statistics: significant p-value set to 0.167 to account for multiple comparisons.

ACR: American College of Rheumatology SLE criteria

SLEDAI: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index

BDI-II: Beck’s Depression Inventory II

MADRS: Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: M. Barraclough, Genzyme Corporation, 2,GSK, 5; R. Elliott, Genzyme, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,Johnson & Johnson, 2; S. McKie, Genzyme Corporation, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,Autifony, 2,Sunovion, 2; B. Parker, Genzyme Corporation, 2; I. N. Bruce, Genzyme Corporation, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Barraclough M, Elliott R, McKie S, Parker B, Bruce IN. The Effects of Disease Activity and Mood Disorders on Cognitive Function in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effects-of-disease-activity-and-mood-disorders-on-cognitive-function-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effects-of-disease-activity-and-mood-disorders-on-cognitive-function-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology