ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3151

The Diagnostic and Predictive Value of Anti-Acetylated Peptide Antibodies in RA Patients Starting Methotrexate Treatment

Paul Studenic1, Stephan Blüml2, Holger Bang3, Manuel Unger4, Karim Raza5, Daniel Aletaha6, Josef S. Smolen7,8 and Günter Steiner9, 1Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology and Geriatric Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Internal Medicine 3; Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3Rsearch & Development, Orgentec Diagnostika GmbH, Mainz, Germany, 4Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 5University of Birmingham, Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, United Kingdom, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 6Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 72nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria, 8Department of Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 9Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biomarkers, methotrexate (MTX), Prognostic factors and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects VI: Management of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Anti-acetylated-peptide antibodies (AAPA) have recently been described in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and may be used as a further diagnostic marker in patients with  early  arthritis. In this study we aimed to determine the prevalence of AAPA in a cohort of RA patients starting their first conventional synthetic DMARD treatment (csDMARD) and additionally evaluated the usefulness of AAPA as potential predictors of clinical response to methotrexate (MTX) therapy.

Methods: We measured IgG and IgA AAPA by ELISA using two acetylated peptides derived from vimentin. We tested by regression, parametric and non-parametric analyses of disease activity measures if AAPA show potency for predicting response to MTX.  

Results: IgG and/or IgA AAPA were detected in 74.5% of the 110 RA patients who stated MTX treatment:  49% were positive for either IgA or IgG antibodies and 25.5% were IgA/IgG double positive. In the AAPA positive patients, 73.6% were positive for IgG AAPA while 26.4% showed IgA antibodies. Importantly, of the 36.4% of patients negative for both RF and ACPA (double negative), 55% were positive for IgG and/or IgA AAPA, and the remaining patients (i.e. 16% of the total cohort) were completely seronegative (triple-negative), see Table. When comparing triple negative patients with the AAPA positive double-negative ones, no significant difference in baseline characteristics was found but a trend that patients with more seroreactivities showed higher composite disease activity scores. Analyzing the clinical response to MTX, IgG-AAPA positive double-negative patients showed a significantly greater relative SDAI change after 6 months compared to triple-negative patients (p=0.028; median (IQR): -44.6% (-58.5 – -28.90) vs. 5.26% (-23.9 – 55.5%) (Figure). In addition, there was a significantly greater relative change in CRP (p=0.035) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.003) in AAPA positive double-negative patients . Table: Crosstable of status of RF, ACPA and antiacetylated peptide antibodies

Anti-acetylated peptide antibodies

  Negative IgA or IgG positive IgA and IgG positive Total
Negative 16.4% 16.4% 3.6% 36.4%
RF 3.6% 3.6% 2.7% 10%
ACPA .9% 1.8% 0.9% 3.6%
RF+ACPA 4.5% 27.3% 18.2% 50%
Total 25.5 49.1 25.4 100%

Figure: Boxplots of relative changes of simplified disease activity score (SDAI) in RF and ACPA negative patients, shown for anti-acetylated (AAPA) positive and negative patients

Conclusion:  AAPA commonly occur in RA patients . Measuring AAPA in addition to RF and ACPA reduced the prevalence of seronegative patients by more than 50 %. These AAPA positive but RF and ACPA negative patients responded significantly better to MTX. Therefore, AAPA positivity in RF and ACPA negative patients identifies a subgroup of patients with a more favorable response to MTX.  


Disclosure: P. Studenic, None; S. Blüml, None; H. Bang, Orgentec, 3; M. Unger, None; K. Raza, None; D. Aletaha, None; J. S. Smolen, None; G. Steiner, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Studenic P, Blüml S, Bang H, Unger M, Raza K, Aletaha D, Smolen JS, Steiner G. The Diagnostic and Predictive Value of Anti-Acetylated Peptide Antibodies in RA Patients Starting Methotrexate Treatment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-diagnostic-and-predictive-value-of-anti-acetylated-peptide-antibodies-in-ra-patients-starting-methotrexate-treatment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-diagnostic-and-predictive-value-of-anti-acetylated-peptide-antibodies-in-ra-patients-starting-methotrexate-treatment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology