ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1043

The Care Pathway and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Uncontrolled Gout: A Real-World Survey of Physicians In The United States

Gordon Lam1, Menaka Bhor2, James Hawthorne2, Arinola Dada3, Molly Edwards4, Emily Goddard4 and John Albert5, 1Arthritis & Osteoporosis Consultants of the Carolinas, Charlotte, NC, 2Sobi Inc, Waltham, MA, 3Overlake Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center, Bellevue, WA, 4Adelphi Real World, Bollington, United Kingdom, 5Rheumatic Disease Center, Glendale, WI

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: gout, Health Services Research, Outcome measures, Surveys, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1038–1054) Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Uncontrolled gout (UG) is a chronic, progressive, and systemic disease characterized by serum uric acid (sUA) >6 mg/dl and clinical manifestations such as tophi, flares and gouty arthropathy, despite the use of urate lowering therapy (ULT). Limited real-world evidence exists on the UG care pathway from diagnosis to long-term management. This study examined the care pathway and treatment patterns of patients with UG in the United States (US).

Methods: Data were extracted from the Adelphi Real World Gout Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey, with retrospective data collection, of physicians (rheumatologists, nephrologists and primary care physicians [PCPs]) and their patients with gout in the US between August 2023 – March 2024. Physicians who participated in the study managed ≥8 patients with gout a month. UG was defined as sUA >6 mg/dl and at least one of the following: gouty arthropathy, ≥1 tophi, or ≥2 flares in the 12 months prior. Patients had to be receiving a ULT. Physicians reported patient demographics, treatment patterns, care pathway and clinical manifestations such as sUA levels, number of tophi and signs/symptoms at diagnosis, treatment initiation and data collection. All patients had a known treatment duration. Analyses were descriptive.

Results: Overall, 88 physicians (45 rheumatologists, 22 nephrologists and 21 PCPs) reported data for 400 patients with UG. In patients who developed UG, there was a mean (standard deviation, SD) of 0.4 (1.3) years between a patients’ first physician visit and gout diagnosis. At diagnosis mean (SD) patient age (n=310) was 53.0 (11.6) years, sUA level (n=330), number of tophi (n=173), and signs/symptoms (n=369) were 11.7 (4.7) mg/dL, 2.8 (2.9), and 2.7 (1.8), respectively.At initiation of current treatment (n=400), mean (SD) sUA level, number of tophi and signs/symptoms were 10.8 (4.3) mg/dL, 3.7 (3.3) and 3.1 (1.9), respectively. Rheumatologists prescribed the current treatment in 56% of patients, nephrologists 29% and PCPs 12%. The most common ULT was allopurinol (63%), followed by febuxostat (29%) and pegloticase (13%). The most common reasons reported by physicians for choosing the current treatment were overall efficacy, long-term efficacy, and sUA reduction for 86%, 63%, and 54% of patients, respectively. However, these same characteristics were also reported by physicians as the most common areas where the treatments could perform better in 32%, 27%, 25% of patients respectively.At data collection (n=400), after a mean (SD) of 21.2 (25.6) months on the current ULT, mean (SD) sUA level, number of tophi and signs/symptoms were 9.1 (4.3) mg/dL, 2.9 (3.1) and 2.7 (1.8), respectively. Mean (SD) number of flares (n=357) in the 12 months prior was 2.3 (1.1).

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world study examining the care pathway and treatment patterns of patients with UG. These data highlight that patients with UG experience extended periods of time with elevated sUA and UG clinical manifestations, despite receiving ULT for almost two years. Given that efficacy was noted as the most common reason for treatment choice and area of improvement, there is a need for optimal treatment utilization and alternative options for patients with UG.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2GP: general practitioner, PCP: Primary care physician, SD: standard deviation, sUA: serum urate acid. Other physicians include ER physician, Podiatrist, Nurse / nurse practitioner, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Other physician. Possible signs/symptoms: Cramp, Fatigue, Fever/flu like symptoms, Gouty arthropathy, defined clinically or radiographically as joint damage due to gout, High sUA (> 6mg/dL), Joint stiffness, Loss of movement/loss of mobility, Pain between flares (chronic pain), Sleep disturbance, Tender/swollen joint(s), Visible tophus(i), Warm joints, Other, None


Disclosures: G. Lam: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 2, 6, Janssen, 1, 2, 6, Pfizer, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 6; M. Bhor: Sobi, 3; J. Hawthorne: Sobi Inc., 3; A. Dada: None; M. Edwards: AbbVie, 2, Adelphi Real World, 3; E. Goddard: Adelphi Real World, 3; J. Albert: Amgen, 1, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lam G, Bhor M, Hawthorne J, Dada A, Edwards M, Goddard E, Albert J. The Care Pathway and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Uncontrolled Gout: A Real-World Survey of Physicians In The United States [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-care-pathway-and-treatment-patterns-in-patients-with-uncontrolled-gout-a-real-world-survey-of-physicians-in-the-united-states/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-care-pathway-and-treatment-patterns-in-patients-with-uncontrolled-gout-a-real-world-survey-of-physicians-in-the-united-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology