ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 1606

Telemedicine for Rheumatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient Perceptions and Preferences

Maria I. Danila1, Kelly Gavigan2, Esteban Rivera2, William Nowell2, Michael George3, Jeffrey Curtis4, Lisa Christopher-Stine5, Shubhasree Banerjee3, Peter Merkel3, Kalen Young6, Dianne Shaw6, Jennifer Gordon6 and Shilpa Venkatachalam2, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, 3University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 6Vasculitis Foundation, Kansas City, MO

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Access to care, autoimmune diseases, COVID-19

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster IV: COVID-19 (1589–1613)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the delivery of medical care and resulted in a substantial uptake in telemedicine care for patients with chronic conditions, including autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions and preferences about telemedicine among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We conducted an online survey among members of ArthritisPower and Vasculitis Patient Powered Research Network online patient registries and members of the following patient organizations: Myositis Support and Understanding, Lupus and Allied Disease Association, American Bone Health, and International Foundation for Autoimmune & Autoinflammatory Arthritis. Attitudes about telemedicine (i.e., telemedicine acceptability) were evaluated using the validated telemedicine perception questionnaire (TMPQ). The TMPQ score (range 17 to 85) was calculated; higher scores show higher acceptability. Visit satisfaction was measured using the one question scale from the validated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS)® survey (0-10 scale, 0 represents worst possible visit, 10 represents best possible visit). T-tests and multivariable linear regression compared the satisfaction and TMPQ scores between respondents who reported participating in video and phone-only visits. Chi-square tests compared preferences for telemedicine visits for specific clinical scenarios between those who had telemedicine visit versus those who had not.

Results: Between June 18 and August 10, 2020, we received 819 responses. Participants had a mean (SD) age of 58.6 (11.6) years and were mostly white (n= 759, 92.7%) and female (n=702, 85.7%). Of 618 participants who said that telemedicine was available to them, 449 (72.7%) reported having a telemedicine visit, with 303 (67.5%) reporting at least one telemedicine video visit; the remainder had a phone-only visit (Table 1). On a 0-10 scale, the mean (standard deviation) visit satisfaction score for telemedicine visits was 7.3 (1.8) with 25.8% being very satisfied (score 9 or 10). The mean (SD) telemedicine acceptability as assessed by TMPQ score was 62.8 (10.7). Video visits and higher TMPQ score were associated with higher satisfaction (data not shown). Preference for a telemedicine visit varied substantially by reasons for the visit (Figure 1). Compared to those who had not yet had a telemedicine visit, patients who had experienced telemedicine were more likely to prefer telemedicine for routine visits (73.7% vs 44.3%, p< 0.001), reviewing test results (64.8% vs 53.8%, p< 0.001), when considering changing medications (40.5% vs. 26.8%; p< 0.001), and when starting a new injectable medication (18.9% vs. 12.7%; p=0.02) (Table 2).

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases frequently had telemedicine visits, the majority via video, and were often satisfied with these visits. These results suggest that because such patients prefer telemedicine for certain types of visits, maximizing effective use of telemedicine should take into consideration specific clinical scenarios and patient preferences.

Table 1

Figure 1

Table 2


Disclosures: M. Danila, Pfizer, 5, Pfizer, 11, AbbVie, 1, Amgen, 5, Amgen, 1, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Horizon, 5, WebMD, 12, writer, Novartis, 1; K. Gavigan, Global Healthy Living Foundation, 3; E. Rivera, None; W. Nowell, Global Healthy Living Foundation, 3, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Eli Lilly, 5; M. George, None; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Janssen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Myriad, 2, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Roche/Genentech, 2, UCB, 2, CorEvitas, 2, 5, Crescendo Bio, 5; L. Christopher-Stine, None; S. Banerjee, None; P. Merkel, AbbVie, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Boeringher-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, ChemoCentryx, 2, 5, CSL Behring, 2, Dynacure, 2, Eicos, 2, EMDSerono, 2, Forbius, 2, 5, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Genzyme/Sanofi, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, InflaRx, 2, 5, Jannsen, 2, Kiniksa, 2, Magenta, 2, Neutrolis, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 5, Star Therapeutics, 2, Takeda, 2, Talaris, 2, UpToDate, 9; K. Young, None; D. Shaw, None; J. Gordon, Excision Biotherapeutics, 2, 11; S. Venkatachalam, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Danila M, Gavigan K, Rivera E, Nowell W, George M, Curtis J, Christopher-Stine L, Banerjee S, Merkel P, Young K, Shaw D, Gordon J, Venkatachalam S. Telemedicine for Rheumatology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient Perceptions and Preferences [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telemedicine-for-rheumatology-care-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-patient-perceptions-and-preferences/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/telemedicine-for-rheumatology-care-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-patient-perceptions-and-preferences/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology