ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1120

Target Serum Urate Levels, Recurrent Gout Flare Rates, and Gout-Primary Hospitalizations: Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study of 3,613 Gout Patients

Natalie McCormick1, Chio Yokose2, Gregory Challener1, Amit Joshi3, Sruthi Tanikella1 and Hyon K. Choi4, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Waltham, MA, 3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Boston, MA, 4Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Lexington, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: gout, hyperuricemia, practice guidelines, primary care, prognostic factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1100–1123) Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Despite rheumatology guidelines’ emphasis on treat-to-target-serum-urate (SU) levels (<6 or <5 mg/dL, urate crystal sub-saturation points), this pathophysiology-based recommendation is not accepted in primary care practice (where >90% of gout care occurs) or endorsed by the American College of Physicians.To that end, proportions of gout flares associated with these target levels, including those requiring hospitalization, are unknown. We quantified associations of target SU with recurrent flares, including gout-primary hospitalizations, among gout patients nested in a prospective nationwide cohort.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of UK adults recruited over 2006-2010 and followed-up through primary care medical record linkage. As done previously [Cipolletta et al. JAMA 2022], flares among prevalent gout patients were ascertained by (1) hospitalization with gout (ICD-10 M10) as primary discharge diagnosis; (2) diagnosis of gout flare in primary care records; or (3) diagnosis of gout in primary care records and prescription issued on the same day for corticosteroids, colchicine, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).We also investigated flares requiring hospitalisation. Poisson regression was used to assess the relation between baseline SU levels and rates of recurrent gout flares over 1, 2, 5, and 10 years of follow-up.

Results: We followed 3,613 prevalent gout patients (86% male, mean age 60 years), among whom we documented 1,770 gout flare events over 10 years.95% (1,676/1,770) and 98% (1,728/1,770) of flares occurred in baseline SU ≥6 and ≥5 mg/dL, respectively. Rate ratio (RR) for flares with SU levels of < 6.0, 6.0-6.9, 7.0-7.9, 8.0-8.9, 9.0-9.9, and ≥10 mg/dL were 1.0, 5.03, 11.64, 11.81, 18.95, and 29.13, respectively during first year of follow-up (1.59 [1.48-1.71] per mg/dL), and 1.0, 3.38, 6.93, 8.57, 10.93, and 11.40, respectively, over whole 10-year follow-up (1.49 [1.45-1.53] per mg/dL) (Table 1).Associations persisted irrespective of sex, race, age group, chronic kidney disease status, and diuretic and urate-lowering therapy use (all P for interaction >0.17) (Table 2). 97% (62/64) and 100% (64/64) of flares requiring hospitalization occurred in baseline SU ≥6 and ≥5 mg/dL, respectively (Table 3); corresponding RR were 1.0, 4.77, 9.02, 10.58, 34.36, and 46.43, respectively (1.77 [1.53-2.05] per mg/dL).

Conclusion: In this prospective cohort of gout patients treated in primary care, 95% and 98% of flares occurred in baseline SU ≥6 and ≥5 mg/dL, respectively. Associations were more prominent for hospitalized flares, with no cases among those with SU < 5mg/dL; higher serum urate levels are strongly associated with frequency of recurrent flares in a graded manner. These findings support the utility of these target urate levels for gout patient care, consistent with a treat-to-target approach recommended by rheumatology societies in the US and Europe, but not the American College of Physicians.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Rate and Rate Ratio (RR) for Recurrent Gout Flares According to Serum Urate Level and Follow-Up Time from Baseline.
No, number; PY, person years; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Rate and Rate Ratio (RR) for Recurrent Gout Flares per mg/dL of Serum Urate, According to Subgroups over 10 Years.
CKD, chronic kidney disease; ULT, urate-lowering therapy; SD, standard deviation.

Supporting image 3

Table 3: Rate and Rate Ratios (RR) for Recurrent Gout Flares Requiring Hospitalization
No, number; PY, person years; SD, standard deviation; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. Hospitalizations were ascertained through March 5, 2020 (max 12.8 years follow-up)


Disclosures: N. McCormick: None; C. Yokose: None; G. Challener: None; A. Joshi: Regeneron, 3; S. Tanikella: None; H. Choi: Ani, 2, Horizon, 2, 5, LG, 2, Protalix, 2, Shanton, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McCormick N, Yokose C, Challener G, Joshi A, Tanikella S, Choi H. Target Serum Urate Levels, Recurrent Gout Flare Rates, and Gout-Primary Hospitalizations: Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study of 3,613 Gout Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/target-serum-urate-levels-recurrent-gout-flare-rates-and-gout-primary-hospitalizations-nationwide-prospective-cohort-study-of-3613-gout-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/target-serum-urate-levels-recurrent-gout-flare-rates-and-gout-primary-hospitalizations-nationwide-prospective-cohort-study-of-3613-gout-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology