ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2096

Role of Cell-Bound Complement Fragments as Biomarkers to Determine Disease Activity in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Marcela Muñoz Urbano1, Diana C. Quintero-González1, Mauricio Rojas2, Joaquín Rodelo1, Alba Luz León Álvarez1, Luis Gonzalez1 and Gloria Vásquez3, 1Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia, 2Grupo de Inmunología Celular e Inmunogenética, GICIG, and Unidad de citometría de flujo, Sede de Investigación Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia, 3Grupo de Inmunología Celular e Inmunogenética, GICIG and Grupo de Reumatología, Universidad de Antioquía, Medellín, Colombia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biomarkers, complement, Disease Activity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), T Cell

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III: Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The prompt identification of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at risk of or in flare strongly influences the prognosis of the disease. Cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) have been studied as biomarkers of SLE activity. Despite growing knowledge, experience with CB-CAPs in the Latin American population is scarce. Therefore, this study aims to explore the behavior of CB-CAPs to determine lupus activity in SLE Colombian patients.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 30 adult SLE patients (ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria) and 24 technical controls. Subjects were recruited from two centers in Medellín, Colombia, between September 2021 – January 2022. We used the non-serological SELENA/SLEDAI index (SELENA/SLEDAIns) to define activity as follows: inactive (0 points), mild/moderate (1-6 points), and severe (≥7 points) activity. We determined by flow cytometry the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the C3d and C4d bound to erythrocytes (E-C3d, E-C4d), reticulocytes (R-C3d, R-C4d), B lymphocytes (B-C3d, B-C4d), T CD4 (TCD4-C3d, TCD4-C4d), and T CD8 (TCD8-C3d, TCD8-C4d) lymphocytes. Descriptive correlations and an exploratory analysis of the accuracy of CB-CAPs to identify severe activity were performed.

Results: Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the SLE patients. Two inactive subjects, 11 with mild disease activity and 17 with severe activity, were included. Table 2 shows correlations between CB-CAPs with anti-dsDNA dilutions and serum complement. There was a statistically significant correlation between clinical SELENA-SLEDAIns with the TCD8-C4d MFI and TCD8-C3d MFI (figure 1). The results showed a negative correlation between C3 levels and SELENA-SLEDAIns for all patients (Rho= -0.57; p=˂0.001) and patients with severe disease activity (Rho= -0.65; p=0.004). In the case of C4, the correlation was -0.51 (p=0.004) for the 30 SLE subjects. Spearman correlation coefficients were not significant between anti-dsDNA by IIF and SELENA/SLEDAIns in none of the groups. The R-C4d had the highest sensitivity (75%), the best specificity (64%), and the area under the ROC curve (0.7 CI 95% 0.53-0.87). Therefore, R-C4d MFI was the CB-CAP with the best performance to discriminate lupus severe activity (SELENA/SLEDAIns ≥7 points).

Conclusion: This is the first time that TCD8-C4d and TCD8-C3d MFI demonstrated significant correlations with lupus disease activity. Previously, T-C4d was correlated with activity in an ethnical minority. To our knowledge, there are no data on this biomarker in large and diverse cohorts, which places a gap in the knowledge and an opportunity for future investigations. As we did, other authors have demonstrated the utility of R-C4d as a lupus disease activity biomarker.

Supporting image 1

APS, antiphospholipid syndrome; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IIF, indirect immunofluorescence; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.
a. Taken at the time of recruitment.
b. Low complement was defined as either C3 or C4 levels below the normal range established at each of the laboratories.

Supporting image 2

C4d and C3d: complement fragments; E, erythrocytes; IIF, indirect immunofluorescence; MFI, median fluorescence intensity; TCD8, CD8+ T lymphocytes; R, reticulocytes.
a. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between CB-CAP levels with anti-dsDNA, C3, and C4.
b. C4d-/ C3d+ reticulocytes.
c. C4d+/ C3d- reticulocytes.
d. C4d+/ C3d+ erythrocytes.
e. C4d+/ C3d+ reticulocytes.

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. Correlations between CB-CAPs MFI with SELENA-SLEDAIns dilutions in the total SLE patient population. A shows the correlation between SELENA-SLEDAIns score and C4d MFI in CD8 T lymphocytes (TCD8-C4d MFI), and B represents the correlation between SELENA-SLEDAIns score and C3d MFI in CD8 T lymphocytes (TCD8-C3d MFI).


Disclosures: M. Muñoz Urbano, None; D. Quintero-González, None; M. Rojas, None; J. Rodelo, None; A. León Álvarez, None; L. Gonzalez, None; G. Vásquez, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Muñoz Urbano M, Quintero-González D, Rojas M, Rodelo J, León Álvarez A, Gonzalez L, Vásquez G. Role of Cell-Bound Complement Fragments as Biomarkers to Determine Disease Activity in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/role-of-cell-bound-complement-fragments-as-biomarkers-to-determine-disease-activity-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/role-of-cell-bound-complement-fragments-as-biomarkers-to-determine-disease-activity-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology