ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1001

Risk of Malignant Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Methotrexate versus Hydroxychloroquine

Hemin Lee1, Sarah Chen2, Nileesa Gautam2, Seanna Vine1, Mengdong He2, Rishi Desai2, Michael Weinblatt1, Robert Glynn2 and Seoyoung Kim2, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Administrative Data, Cohort Study, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Epidemiology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster III: Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Previous randomized clinical trials and observational studies have signaled an increased risk of skin cancer in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with immunosuppressants such as methotrexate (MTX).  The objective of this study was to compare the incidence rates of malignant melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in RA patients initiating MTX versus hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) using real-world data.

Methods: Using Medicare claims data (Parts A/B/D 2006-2017), we conducted a cohort study of RA patients who were 65 years or older and initiators of MTX or HCQ as their first DMARD.  Cohort entry date was the date of the first dispensing for either MTX or HCQ.  At least 365 days of continuous enrollment in Medicare parts A, B, and D was required. We excluded patients who used any disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), chloroquine, other immunosuppressants, or had a history of malignancy including skin cancer, immunosuppression, psoriatic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus. The primary outcome was a composite of malignant melanoma and NMSC.  Malignant melanoma was defined based on a validated algorithm requiring two International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 or 10 diagnosis codes separated by 1-60 days (PPV 83%).  NMSC was also defined based on a validated algorithm using one ICD 9 or 10 diagnosis code followed by a NMSC-related procedural code occurring within 60 days (PPV 84%). Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome: malignant melanoma, NMSC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). To control for confounding, we conducted one-to-one propensity score (PS) matching using more than 60 covariates assessed during a 365-day baseline period.  We calculated the incidence rates (IRs), hazard ratios (HRs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome.

Results: A total of 24,611 PS-matched pairs of MTX and HCQ initiators were identified.  The mean (SD) age was 73.8 (6.6) years and 78% were female. Patient demographics, dermatologic conditions, comorbidities, medication use, and healthcare utilization were well-balanced between the two treatment groups at baseline (Table 1).  During a total person-years of 52,836, we observed 693 (MTX) and 612 (HCQ) cases of malignant melanoma or NMSC. The IR per 1,000 person-year for the primary outcome was 24.57 (MTX) versus 24.85 (HCQ), and the HR comparing MTX with HCQ was 0.97 (95%CI 0.87-1.09).  For secondary outcomes, MTX was associated with an elevated risk of BCC (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.08-1.60) but a decreased risk of SCC (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.61-0.97) compared with HCQ (Table 2).

Conclusion: In this large cohort of older RA patients initiating MTX or HCQ as their first DMARD, we found no difference in the risk of skin cancer including malignant melanoma and NMSC.  However, for individual subsets of NMSC, the risk of BCC was higher in the MTX group compared with HCQ initiators while the risk of SCC was lower.


Disclosure: H. Lee, None; S. Chen, Gilead, 1, 2; N. Gautam, None; S. Vine, Precision Health Economics, 1; M. He, None; R. Desai, Bayer, 2, Vertex, 2, Novartis, 2; M. Weinblatt, Crescendo Bioscience, 1, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, Lilly, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, Abbvie, 1, Amgen, 1, Arena, 1, Canfite, 1, Corrona, 1, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, Gilead, 1, Horizon, 1, Johnson and Johnson, 1, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 5, Scipher, 5, Set Point, 5, Canfite Inmedix, 9, Lycera Vorso, 9, Scipher, 9; R. Glynn, AstraZeneca, 1, Kowa, 1, Pfizer, 1, Novartis, 1; S. Kim, Pfizer, 2, Roche, 2, AbbVie, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee H, Chen S, Gautam N, Vine S, He M, Desai R, Weinblatt M, Glynn R, Kim S. Risk of Malignant Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Initiating Methotrexate versus Hydroxychloroquine [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-malignant-melanoma-and-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiating-methotrexate-versus-hydroxychloroquine/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-malignant-melanoma-and-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-initiating-methotrexate-versus-hydroxychloroquine/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology