ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2173

Rheumatology Telemedicine Consults: Impact of Demographic Variability on Patient Perception in Systemic Sclerosis versus Rheumatoid Arthritis Pts

Yossra Suliman1, Julia mumper2, Gary Feldman3, M. Cameron Hay4 and Daniel Furst5, 1Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, 2Miami University, Miami, OH, 3Pacific Arthritis, Los Angeles, CA, 4Miami University (Ohio), Oxford, OH, 5University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Anxiety, Outcome measures, quality of life, Scleroderma

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Clinical Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: In the era of emerging need to utilize remote technology-based health care services due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we wanted to evaluate patient satisfaction and challenges when using telemedicine for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) versus rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and to evaluate physician satisfaction when using telemedicine as well.

Methods: Fifty Pts with rheumatologic diseases {28 SSc , 22 RA } , More than 18 yrs old were enrolled in our study. Demographic data were obtained by chart review. Disease activity was reported using patient pain and physician global assessment of patient disease activity (MD global) (0-10 scale). The structured questionnaire primarily used closed-ended questions; however, patients were asked to express their opinions regarding the telemedicine experience, the quality of the consultation in comparison to in-person experience and their overall satisfaction with the telehealth consultation. For the same telehealth consultation, the rheumatologist also completed a structured questionnaire.

Results: Eighty six percent of pts were Females, mean age 55 yrs (SD17) with predominantly high degree of education: 40 pts (80%) had a college education or higher . Forty-four patients (88%) reported being satisfied with telehealth, Forty-three patients (86%) rated the quality of the consultations as excellent to good. Sixty nine percent of SSc patients were concerned about the lack of Physical Examination (PE), versus 27% of RA pts, (p-value =0.02). Fourteen percent of SSc patients spent more than 5 minutes in setting up the telemedicine call while only one of the RA patients (4.5%) reported such difficulty. SSc patients were approximately equally satisfied overall with telemedicine visits compared to the RA patients. Nevertheless, SSc patients reported numerically more technological issues than RA patients ( RA: 24 ;38% instances: SSc:38; 61% instances) p-value= 0.059)

Age, disease activity (MD global) and Income, emerged as prominent factors affecting the perception of the telemedicine visit. Older age groups were associated with more technical difficulties(P=0.0059 ). Pts with higher disease activity (MD global) reported more difficulties with technology during the telehealth visit(P=0.027). Lower income patients had numerically more concerns regarding lack of Physical Exam (P0.1), suggesting that telehealth might be associated with health inequity concerns. The majority (69 %) of SSc patients were concerned about the lack of PE, versus only 27% of RA pts (P -value =0.02).

In contrast with the patients, the rheumatologists were satisfied with the telehealth consultations in only 28 (56%) of the sessions. The main drawbacks were related to technical aspects of the virtual visit, and inability to do a full physical exam.

Conclusion: Overall patient satisfaction was high based on convenience and safety. Age, disease activity (MD global) and income emerged as major concerns to be considered in telemedicine platforms. We highlighted the vulnerable groups who had more concerns and challenges, to be considered when using a telemedicine platform.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: Y. Suliman, None; J. mumper, None; G. Feldman, None; M. Hay, None; D. Furst, AbbVie/Abbott, Pfizer, CORBUS, GALAPAGOS, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), NIH, Novartis, HORIZON, PROMETHEUS, SANOFI, Roche, Genentech, GALDERMA, CME, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Amgen.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Suliman Y, mumper J, Feldman G, Hay M, Furst D. Rheumatology Telemedicine Consults: Impact of Demographic Variability on Patient Perception in Systemic Sclerosis versus Rheumatoid Arthritis Pts [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-telemedicine-consults-impact-of-demographic-variability-on-patient-perception-in-systemic-sclerosis-versus-rheumatoid-arthritis-pts/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatology-telemedicine-consults-impact-of-demographic-variability-on-patient-perception-in-systemic-sclerosis-versus-rheumatoid-arthritis-pts/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology