ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0799

Relationships of Rheumatology Care and Patient Experiences to Rheumatoid Arthritis Remission

Kelly O'Neill1, Kathryne Marks2, Pamela Sinicrope3, Cynthia Crowson4, Elena Myasoedova3 and John Davis3, 1Rheumatoid Patient Foundation, Lutz, FL, 2Rheumatoid Patient Foundation, Boston, MA, 3Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 4Mayo Clinic, Eyota, MN

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disease Activity, Patient reported outcomes, Qualitative Research, rheumatoid arthritis, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Miscellaneous Aspects of RA (0786–0812)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Remission is a well-established optimal outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, yet a minority of patients reach this goal. There is not one recognized definition for RA remission, but several sets of criteria regarded as remission or low disease activity. Except aggressive treatment and less time between diagnosis and treatment, little is known of what factors may impact RA remission. Building on a long-term collaboration of a non-profit organization and an academic rheumatology center, we explored factors associated with RA remission.

Methods: An anonymous survey was offered in 2019 on a secure online system. Participants were U.S. residents age ≥18 years with a self-reported RA diagnosis by a medical professional. They responded to questions on demographics, RA disease activity (DA), diagnosis and DMARD history, improvement from treatment, and RA treatment goals. Analyses included descriptive statistics with chi-square and rank sum tests for comparisons. Treatment goals were thematically coded and verified for reliability by a team using qualitative content analysis.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 907 RA patients (90% women, 10% men), with 58 (11) mean (SD) years age and 11 (10) years since diagnosis. About twice as many reported being given an explicit diagnosis of RA remission (n=102; 11%) as patients who rated their DA as “in remission” (n=49; 5%). Patients rating their DA as in remission tried fewer different DMARDs than patients with more active disease (mean: remission 3.3; mild 4.2; moderate 5.7; severe DA 8.8). Those with diagnosed remission tried fewer mean DMARDs (4.7) than all respondents (5.8). Both self-reported remission and diagnosed remission were associated with less time between symptom onset and DMARD treatment. In both groups, about 35% were treated < 6 months of onset, but in all respondents, only 24% were treated this early. Both remission groups were associated with older current age and older age at diagnosis. Both remission groups were more likely to have had discussions with providers about RA treatment goals (diagnosed, 44% self-report, 51%) than all patients surveyed (37%).

Conclusion: This survey found previously unreported associations between remission and aspects of rheumatology care including time from symptom onset to treatment, age at diagnosis, and frequency of shared treatment goal discussions, independent of whether remission was clinically diagnosed or based on patient-reported DA levels. Our study is unique in that diagnosed remission is compared to self-reported DA “in remission,” the former being twice as frequent. Further research should seek greater insight on patient experiences in remission and explore how factors associated with remission may be used to increase the rate of remission in people with RA.

Patient-assessed Disease Activity (DA) in Diagnosed RA Remission: Figure 1. Respondents replying “Yes” to “Does your doctor consider your RA to be in remission?” are divided by their replies to the question ”What is your current level of RA disease activity?”

RA Remission and Shared Treatment Goal Discussions: Figure 2. Patients in each category were asked whether their
providers had discussed RA treatment goals with them.

Diagnosed remission in RA compared to patient-reported disease activity “in remission.”


Disclosures: K. O'Neill, None; K. Marks, None; P. Sinicrope, None; C. Crowson, None; E. Myasoedova, None; J. Davis, Pfizer, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

O'Neill K, Marks K, Sinicrope P, Crowson C, Myasoedova E, Davis J. Relationships of Rheumatology Care and Patient Experiences to Rheumatoid Arthritis Remission [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relationships-of-rheumatology-care-and-patient-experiences-to-rheumatoid-arthritis-remission/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relationships-of-rheumatology-care-and-patient-experiences-to-rheumatoid-arthritis-remission/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology