ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0563

Relation of Pain Sensitization to Isokinetic Knee Extension Torque: The MOST Study

Patrick Corrigan1, Tuhina Neogi2, Laura Frey Law3, Neil Segal4, Michael Nevitt5, Beth Lewis6 and Joshua Stefanik1, 1Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 2Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 4University of Kansas Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, 5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, Orinda, CA, 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Epidemiology, Muscle strength, pain

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: Epidemiology & Public Health Poster II: OA, Osteoporosis, & Other Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Central and local alterations in nociception are related to heightened pain severity and can be present in people who have knee osteoarthritis (OA). Yet, it is unknown if pain sensitization independently contributes to alterations in muscle function beyond the effect of pain severity. Thus, we aimed to examine the relation of pain sensitization to knee extension torque in adults with or at risk for knee OA.

Methods: Data from the 60-month visit of the MOST Study were used for this cross-sectional analysis. MOST is a cohort study of persons with or at risk for knee OA. Pain pressure threshold (PPT) and temporal summation (TS) were assessed at the right wrist and patella. PPT was measured with mechanical algometry (tip size=1 cm2; rate=0.5 kg/s), and defined as the minimum pressure that caused slight pain. Three trials were performed at each site and averaged. For analysis, PPTs were divided into sex-specific tertiles. TS was assessed by repeatedly touching the skin (rate=1 Hz) with a 60 g monofilament for 30 s, and the presence of TS was defined as new or increased pain. Isokinetic knee extension torque was measured for the right leg at 60°/s with a computerized dynamometer. Maximum concentric knee extension torque was extracted from 4 maximal-effort trials, and normalized to body mass. Separate general linear regression models determined the relation of PPT and TS at the right wrist and patella to maximal knee extension torque of the right leg. Models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), clinic site, depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, average knee pain severity in the past month (Visual Analog Scale; VAS), and the presence of radiographic OA (ROA). Additionally, analyses were repeated after stratifying by sex and the presence of pain (VAS > 0) separately.

Results: 1702 participants (60% female) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 67.3 (7.7) years, BMI of 30.3 (5.6) kg/m2, VAS of 15.3 (19.6) mm, and maximum knee extension torque of 1.03 (0.41) Nm/kg. Mean PPTs at the right wrist and patella were 3.4 (1.5) and 5.2 (2.2) kg/cm2, respectively. Knee extension torque was significantly less in those with lower PPTs (i.e., higher pain sensitivity) compared to those with high PPTs (Table 1). Notably, those with the lowest PPTs at the patella were 14.3% weaker than those with the highest PPTs. For TS, the prevalence was 40.8% at the right wrist and 39.7% at the patella. Knee extension torque was significantly less in those with TS compared to those without TS, but the difference was small (i.e., < 5% weaker) (Table 1). In sex-specific analyses, lower PPTs were significantly associated with lower knee extension torques for both sexes, but the presence of TS was only associated with lower knee extension torques for females (Table 2). Lastly, low PPTs were associated with lower knee extension torques regardless of the presence of pain, but the presence of TS was only associated with lower knee extension torques for those with pain (Table 3).

Conclusion: Increased pain sensitivity, centrally and locally, is related to lower knee extension torque in adults with or at risk for knee OA. This relation is independent of knee pain severity and provides support that nervous system alterations may not only affect pain severity, but also muscle function.


Disclosure: P. Corrigan, None; T. Neogi, Lilly, 1, EMD Merck Serono, 1, Novartis, 1, Regeneron, 1, Pfizer/Lilly, 1; L. Frey Law, None; N. Segal, Flexion Therapeutics, 2, Zimmer-Biomet, 2, Pacira CryoHealth, 2; M. Nevitt, None; B. Lewis, None; J. Stefanik, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Corrigan P, Neogi T, Frey Law L, Segal N, Nevitt M, Lewis B, Stefanik J. Relation of Pain Sensitization to Isokinetic Knee Extension Torque: The MOST Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-pain-sensitization-to-isokinetic-knee-extension-torque-the-most-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/relation-of-pain-sensitization-to-isokinetic-knee-extension-torque-the-most-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology