ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0586

Real World Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Previously Treated with TNF Inhibitors: Data from the OM1 Registry

Alexis Ogdie1, Xiaolan Ye2, Yi Peng3, Christopher Saffore4, Jayne Stigler5 and Martin Bergman6, 1Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2AbbVie Inc., Mettawa, IL, 3AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL, 4AbbVie Inc., waukegan, IL, 5AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 6self, Beach Haven, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Epidemiology, Outcome measures, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: SpA Including PsA – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of PsA in randomized controlled trials of patients with inadequate response or intolerance to biologic DMARDs1; however, there remains limited real-world data on the effectiveness of UPA. This study assessed real-world improvement in key clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among adult PsA patients initiating UPA after prior experience with a TNF inhibitor.

Methods: The OM1 PsA registry (January 2013-March 2024) was used to identify TNF inhibitor-experienced PsA patients who initiated UPA on or after December 14, 2021. The OM1 PsA Registry (OM1, Inc; Boston, MA) follows > 60k PsA patients in the US managed by rheumatologists longitudinally with clinical data and linked administrative claims. Inclusion criteria were defined as ≥ 18 years of age, ≥ 1 UPA claim (index date defined as the first UPA claim), ≥ 1 claim of TNF inhibitor before index date, ≥ 6 months of available data before index date (ie, baseline period), ≥ 1 baseline outcome measure, and ≥ 1 follow-up outcome measure (3- or 6-months post index). Mean changes from baseline were evaluated at both 3 and 6 months for the following clinical outcomes and PROs: RAPID3, TJC28, SJC28, pain by visual analog scale (VAS: 0-10), fatigue by numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10), Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) Physician Global Assessment (PGA: 0-10), and MDHAQ Patient Global Assessment (PtGA: 0-10). For each outcome, paired t tests were performed to test the difference between the baseline and follow-up scores at 3- and 6-months post index.

Results: A total of 535 TNF inhibitor-experienced patients with PsA met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 55.2 years, 73% of patients were female, and 95% were White. Most patients were covered under commercial insurance (73%), followed by Medicare (24%), and Medicaid (3%) (Table 1). At baseline, overall mean ± SD scores were 4.45 ± 2.23 for RAPID3, 5.97 ± 7.15 for TJC28, 3.13 ± 4.56 for SJC28, 5.71 ± 2.62 for pain, 5.95 ± 2.61 for fatigue, 3.54 ± 2.60 for MDHAQ PGA, and 5.21 ± 2.67 for MDHAQ PtGA. At 3 months, significant improvements (all P < 0.05) were observed for all the clinical outcomes and PROs: RAPID3 (-0.44 ± 2.02), TJC28 (-1.82 ± 6.09), SJC28 (-0.97 ± 3.29), pain (-0.85 ± 2.48), fatigue (-0.73 ± 2.13), MDHAQ PGA (-0.72 ± 2.39), and MDHAQ PtGA (-0.53 ± 2.62) (Table 2). The improvements at 3 months were maintained at 6 months.

Conclusion: TNF inhibitor-experienced patients with PsA who initiated UPA demonstrated significant and sustained improvements in joint involvement, pain, fatigue, and overall health in real-world clinical practice.

Reference:
1. Mease PJ, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:312-20.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Celgene, 2, CorEvitas, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Happify Health, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2; X. Ye: AbbVie, 3, 11; Y. Peng: AbbVie, 3, 11; C. Saffore: AbbVie, 3, 11; J. Stigler: AbbVie, 3, 11; M. Bergman: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 11, Merck/MSD, 2, 6, 11, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Sa, 2, 5, Sandoz, 2, 6, Scifer, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie A, Ye X, Peng Y, Saffore C, Stigler J, Bergman M. Real World Effectiveness of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Previously Treated with TNF Inhibitors: Data from the OM1 Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-effectiveness-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-previously-treated-with-tnf-inhibitors-data-from-the-om1-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-effectiveness-of-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-previously-treated-with-tnf-inhibitors-data-from-the-om1-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology