ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0664

Quantitative Hand Held Dynamometry to Assess Muscle Strength in Scleroderma Associated Myopathy

Julie Paik1, Christopher Mecoli2, Anshula Nallapati1, Ami Shah3, Fred Wigley4, Zsuzsanna McMahan5 and Laura Hummers1, 1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Ellicott City, MD, 4Department of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 5Johns Hopkins Rheumatology, Lutherville, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Muscle strength, Myopathies, Myositis, Scleroderma, Systemic

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0609–0672) Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I: Research

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Manual muscle strength testing can be challenging in SSc associated myopathy (SSc-AM) due to contractures or skin tightening. Since there is currently no validated strength assessment in SSc, the purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and validity of hand held dynamometry (HHD) in SSc-AM.

Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of 36 patients with SSc-AM enrolled at a single-center from August 2021 to May 2022. Inclusion criteria required patients to fulfill the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc, and have skeletal myopathy as defined by a history of proximal weakness and/or elevated creatine kinase (CK) with at least one abnormal objective test result such as myopathic findings on EMG, muscle edema on muscle MRI, or inflammation, necrosis, or fibrosis on muscle biopsy.

Quantitative muscle strength testing of 3 proximal muscle groups [neck flexors, iliopsoas (bilateral hip flexors), and deltoid (bilateral arm abductors)], was assessed using a Micro-FET2 HHD and compared to the validated Manual Muscle Testing of 8 muscles (MMT-8). Each patient underwent 3 serial measurements for each of the three proximal muscle groups. A second blinded investigator performed the same assessments on 7 patients to assess inter-rater reliability. Both investigators had prior training using HHD and MMT-8.

The final HHD score was an average of each proximal muscle group (with or without neck flexors). Intra-rater reliability was assessed with a Pearson correlation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Inter-rater reliability was also assessed with ICC. To determine how well the HHD score correlated with MMT-8, Pearson correlation was used to quantify the magnitude of correlation.

Results: Thirty-six patients with SSc-AM were enrolled. The average age at enrollment was 52.5 ± 11.1 years and at SSc diagnosis was 44.2 ± 11.9 years. 75% (27 of 36) were female and 44% (16 of 36) were Black while 37% (17 of 36) were Caucasian. 63.8% had diffuse SSc with a maximum modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) of 13.7 ± 10.1. Maximum CK was 311 ± 425 U/L and aldolase was 12.6 ± 8.9 U/L . Closest CK at time of enrollment was 165 ± 166 U/L. Available commercial autoantibody testing and Euroimmun SSc profile demonstrated that 15% were anti-Scl-70 positive, 15% anti-PM-Scl positive, 6.25% anti-centromere B positive, 15% anti-RNA Poly III positive, 22% anti-U3RNP positive, 5.5% positive for U1RNP.

HHD strongly correlated with MMT-8 with neck flexors (r=0.70, p< 0.00001) and without neck flexors (r=0.68, p< 0.00001) (See Figure 1). Intra-rater reliability of HHD for the three consecutive assessments was also strong for the neck flexors and arm abductors with ICC of 0.96 (CI 0.94, 0.98) and hip flexors was ICC of 0.87 (CI 0.79,0.93), p=0.001. The inter-rater reliability of HHD between two examiners was good for the neck flexors [ICC of 0.87 (CI 0.23-0.97), p=0.01], arm abductors [ICC of 0.88 (CI 0.39-0.98), p=0.006] and hip flexors with [ICC of 0.73 (CI -0.56-0.95, p=0.07)].

Conclusion: HHD highly correlates with the validated MMT-8 in SSc-AM and demonstrates good intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, thereby making it a feasible alternative to quantify and measure muscle strength in scleroderma.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: J. Paik: None; C. Mecoli: None; A. Nallapati: None; A. Shah: Arena Pharmaceuticals, 5, Eicos Sciences, 5, Kadmon Corporation, 5, Medpace LLC, 5; F. Wigley: None; Z. McMahan: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 12, medical writing support for a different manuscript; L. Hummers: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, Biotest, 2, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 5, CSL Behring, 1, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Kadmon Corporation, 5, Medpace, 5, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 5, Prometheus, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Paik J, Mecoli C, Nallapati A, Shah A, Wigley F, McMahan Z, Hummers L. Quantitative Hand Held Dynamometry to Assess Muscle Strength in Scleroderma Associated Myopathy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-hand-held-dynamometry-to-assess-muscle-strength-in-scleroderma-associated-myopathy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/quantitative-hand-held-dynamometry-to-assess-muscle-strength-in-scleroderma-associated-myopathy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology