ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0837

Providers’ Adoption of 2017 Guidelines on DMARD Use Perioperatively for Elective Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at a Single Academic Center

Chris Ching1, Erica Mulcaire-Jones2, Andrew Shaffer1, Jeremy Gililland1, Michael Battistone3 and Dorota Lebiedz-Odrobina1, 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Aging, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Osteoarthritis, surgery, Total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain, and Rehabilitation Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Rate of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is higher in patients with rheumatic conditions than in patients with OA. Our orthopedic group found an association between perioperative continuation of biologic medication and PJI in the veteran population (Carlson VR et al, J Arthroplasty 2021). The 2017 ACR/AAHKS guidelines make recommendations for the prescribing of conventional synthetic (cs), biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs around the time of elective TJA. The purpose of our study was to examine the adoption of guidelines by orthopedists and rheumatologists.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of rheumatologic patients who had TJA between 10/2015 and 9/2019 at the University of Utah. 113 patients met our inclusion and exclusion criteria (Fig 1). Patient characteristics described in Table 1. Patients were analyzed in two groups, defined by whether they had been prescribed a csDMARD versus a b/tsDMARD in the year prior to TJA. Clinic notes were manually reviewed for documented recommendations by an orthopedist or rheumatologist regarding continuation or discontinuation of DMARD therapy perioperatively. We used the ACR/AAHKS 2017 perioperative guidelines to classify whether a provider made the correct recommendation. If b/tsDMARD was held longer than recommended by guidelines we classified as correct. If the correct recommendation was made but patient received medication inappropriately, we classified as correct. Chi-squared analysis determined whether a change occurred in rate of correct management of DMARDs after guideline publication in August 2017. Lastly, it was determined if patients had a prednisone prescription within 1 year prior to surgery date, and the mean dose before and after guideline publication was compared using Students T-test.

Results: There was a significant change in prescribing practices for csDMARDs and b/tsDMARDs before versus after guideline publication (fig 2). Two patients had the correct recommendations made by a provider but received an infusion prior to surgery. The average dose of prednisone prescribed before versus after guidelines released was 2 (range 0-12) mg and 0.7 (range 0-12) mg respectively (p=0.015). The number of PJIs in our cohort before and after guidelines were published was 0 and 2 respectively.

Conclusion: Our institution overall successfully adopted the 2017 ACR/AAHKS perioperative guidelines for TJA, but there is still room to improve. Our study was not powered to determine whether guidelines would lower PJI rate. Limitations include the involvement of an orthopedist at our institution in the guidelines, so guidelines may have been more widely adopted than at other institutions. Future directions include expanding our cohort to additional institutions to increase power for surgical complication rates, including PJI, before versus after guidelines published.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: C. Ching, None; E. Mulcaire-Jones, None; A. Shaffer, None; J. Gililland, Stryker, OrthoGrid, DJO, MiCare Path; M. Battistone, None; D. Lebiedz-Odrobina, Pfizer.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ching C, Mulcaire-Jones E, Shaffer A, Gililland J, Battistone M, Lebiedz-Odrobina D. Providers’ Adoption of 2017 Guidelines on DMARD Use Perioperatively for Elective Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at a Single Academic Center [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/providers-adoption-of-2017-guidelines-on-dmard-use-perioperatively-for-elective-total-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty-at-a-single-academic-center/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/providers-adoption-of-2017-guidelines-on-dmard-use-perioperatively-for-elective-total-hip-and-knee-arthroplasty-at-a-single-academic-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology