ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0734

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis Among Younger versus Older Individuals: Cross-sectional Study of Surgical Appropriateness and Surgeon Decision-Making

Gillian Hawker1, Eric Bohm2, Michael Dunbar3, Allyson Jones4, Tom Noseworthy5 and Deborah Marshall5, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Concordia Hip & Knee Institute, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 3Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 4University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Arthroplasty, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Total joint replacement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II (0723–0738)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Rising rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in younger adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) has prompted concern about surgical appropriateness. We compared patient appropriateness for TKA, using previously validated criteria, and surgeons’ recommendations for TKA, by patient age.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited patients with knee OA referred for TKA consultation to two centralized provincial arthroplasty intake centers in Alberta, Canada. Patients aged 30 years or older and determined by the surgeon to have primary knee OA on physical examination and imaging were eligible. Individuals with inflammatory arthritis were excluded. To examine age effects, recruitment continued until there was at least 200 individuals aged 30-59, 60-69 and ≥ 70 years. A pre-consult questionnaire assessed measures of patients’ TKA appropriateness (need: knee symptoms, prior OA treatment; readiness/willingness to undergo TKA; health status; expectations) and contextual factors. Post-consultation, surgeons reported if TKA had been recommended and if not, why. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed the relationships between patient age (< 60 versus ≥ 60) and TKA appropriateness and receipt of surgeon recommendation for TKA.

Results: Of 2,064 participants, 26.0% were < 60 years of age, 68.0% female, 35.6% employed. Compared to older participants, younger participants reported significantly worse knee symptoms, higher use of OA therapies and similar TKA readiness/willingness. They were also more likely to have BMI >40 kg/m2, smoke and endorse return to exercise/sports as a very important TKA outcome. TKA was offered to 1,525 individuals (73.9%). In multivariable analyses, controlling for TKA appropriateness, we found no relationship between patient age and surgeons’ recommendations for TKA (OR, odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.10). Surgeons were significantly more likely to recommend TKA to those with TKA need, willingness and for whom improved ability to perform daily activities was very important. They were less likely to recommend surgery to smokers and for whom return to exercise/sport was important.

Conclusion: Among individuals referred for surgical consultation regarding TKA for knee OA, we found that younger patients (< 60 years old) had comparable TKA need, readiness and willingness as those aged 60 years or older. However, younger individuals were more likely to be obese, smoke, and desire to return to sport after TKA, which may increase risk for complications, including early revision. Incorporation of TKA appropriateness criteria into patient referral and patient-surgeon decision-making regarding TKA has potential to facilitate a balanced consideration of TKA benefits alongside the risks in a growing population of young, obese individuals with knee OA.


Disclosures: G. Hawker, None; E. Bohm, None; M. Dunbar, None; A. Jones, None; T. Noseworthy, None; D. Marshall, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hawker G, Bohm E, Dunbar M, Jones A, Noseworthy T, Marshall D. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis Among Younger versus Older Individuals: Cross-sectional Study of Surgical Appropriateness and Surgeon Decision-Making [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/primary-total-knee-arthroplasty-for-knee-osteoarthritis-among-younger-versus-older-individuals-cross-sectional-study-of-surgical-appropriateness-and-surgeon-decision-making/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/primary-total-knee-arthroplasty-for-knee-osteoarthritis-among-younger-versus-older-individuals-cross-sectional-study-of-surgical-appropriateness-and-surgeon-decision-making/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology