ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0703

Preliminary Results from the RECONNOITER Trial, a Phase 2 Study of AISA 021 in the Treatment of Secondary Raynaud’s, Primarily Due to Systemic Sclerosis

Andrew Sternlicht1, Michael Shanahan2, Erin Morton2, Meredith Todd3, Ivana Hunt2, Zoey Reed2, amanda weragoda4, Lashika Weerakoon2 and Elizabeth Briggs2, 1Tufts University Medical Center and Aisa Pharma, Inc., Boston, MA, 2Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia, 3Aisa Pharma Pty Ltd., East Lindfield, New South Wales, Australia, 4F, Adelaide, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: autoimmune diseases, clinical trial, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Raynaud's phenomenon, Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: While 95% of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients have Raynaud’s phenomenon(RP) and many patients rate it as the most bothersome and severe symptom of their disease, current treatments are only minimally effective and have little disease impact other than a modest reduction in the attack frequency.  AISA-021 (cilnidipine) is a novel calcium channel antagonist with significant inhibition of N-type channel activity, conferring a range of downstream biologic effects of possible relevance to treatment of RP and SSc.  Here we report preliminary results from a Phase 2A trial in patients with SSc-RP to determine safety and preliminary efficacy of AISA-021 use in patients with SSc-RP.  Dose response and the combination with PDE-V inhibition was also evaluated.   A comparison with current  CCB use for SSc-RP is offered.

Methods: RECONNOITER-1 is a Phase 2, two-part trial, in 76 patients with SSc-RP.  The first part of the trial is  reported here.  Dose groups were AISA-021 10mg and 20mg, alone and with tadalafil 5mg, tadalafil alone and placebo.  The primary endpoint was reduction in weekly frequency of RP.   Secondary endpoints included Raynaud’s Condition Score (RCS), pain, severity, duration, gastrointestinal symptoms, endothelial function, and the SHAQ.  The DSMB met and reviewed data on the first 27 patients.

Results: The ITT population included 27 patients; mITT (24) and PP(21) populations were also defined.  Results are reported for the mITT population for whom any post treatment data was available.  Pooled cilnidipine-only treated patients(n=7) saw a reduction in weekly frequency of attacks of 42.2% versus a reduction of attacks of 18.9% in placebo(n=4) A dose response was seen on the primary endpoint of attack frequency and on severity. Response was also greater in the high dose group on attack duration and RCS.  Addition of tadalafil increased treatment effect with 10 mg but not with 20 mg.  Cilnidipine at either dose was well tolerated and only Grade 1 mild AEs were reported in 17.6% of cilnidipine-treated patients, with no treatment discontinuations due to adverse events.   Results favoring AISA-021 over placebo were seen on all domains of the SHAQ.  The DSMB advised terminating Part 1 early based on meeting study goals and Part B will compare Cilnidipine 20mg daily to placebo. 

Conclusion: In this preliminary safety and efficacy study, AISA-021 was well-tolerated and efficacy trends were seen.  A published metanalysis of CCB use for RP finds AE frequency of >46% and treatment discontinuation in >30% of patients. (P= 0.02 for AISA-021 superiority on safety c/w CCBs).  Results replicate the improved 24 year safety record of cilnidipine in hypertension treatment in the SSc-RP population.  Increased N-type channel blockade is believed to be responsible for the increased safety with the drug and may produce increased efficacy as well. Additional data will be available from Part 2 of the RECONNOITER study.

Supporting image 1

Potential pathways for N-type calcium channel antagonism benefit in SSc-RP and SSc

Supporting image 2

Phase 2A results suggest AISA-021 may have clinically meaningful (>25% effect size) benefit in SSc-RP

Supporting image 3

AISA-021 has favorable effect on SHAQ parameters after two weeks of once-daily oral treatment


Disclosures: A. Sternlicht: Aisa Pharma, Inc., 4, 8; M. Shanahan: None; E. Morton: None; M. Todd: Aisa Pharma, Inc., 2; I. Hunt: None; Z. Reed: None; a. weragoda: None; L. Weerakoon: None; E. Briggs: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sternlicht A, Shanahan M, Morton E, Todd M, Hunt I, Reed Z, weragoda a, Weerakoon L, Briggs E. Preliminary Results from the RECONNOITER Trial, a Phase 2 Study of AISA 021 in the Treatment of Secondary Raynaud’s, Primarily Due to Systemic Sclerosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preliminary-results-from-the-reconnoiter-trial-a-phase-2-study-of-aisa-021-in-the-treatment-of-secondary-raynauds-primarily-due-to-systemic-sclerosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preliminary-results-from-the-reconnoiter-trial-a-phase-2-study-of-aisa-021-in-the-treatment-of-secondary-raynauds-primarily-due-to-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology