ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2553

Predictors of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARD Initiation for Rheumatoid Arthritis Across Underserved Patient Groups: Insights from a National Cohort Study

Mark Russell1, Mark Gibson2, Benjamin Zuckerman1, Kanta Kumar3, Shirish Dubey4, Maryam Adas2, Edward Alveyn2, Samir Patel1, Zijing Yang1, Katie Bechman2, Elizabeth Price5, Sarah Gallagher6, Andrew Cope2, Sam Norton1 and James Galloway7, 1King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom, 2King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 3University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 4Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5Great Western Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, England, United Kingdom, 6British Society for Rheumatology, London, United Kingdom, 7Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, Cohort Study, Epidemiology, race/ethnicity, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: Quantifying healthcare inequality is essential to addressing the imbalance in outcomes attributable to age, gender, ethnicity and multimorbidity. In this study, we analysed differences in the initiation of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with RA within the universal healthcare system of England and Wales

Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted using the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) dataset, which enrols patients newly referred with inflammatory arthritis diagnoses in England and Wales. We included all patients with RA who were enrolled in NEIAA between May 8, 2018, and April 30, 2022, and who had 12-month follow-up data available. Modified Poisson regression was used to explore factors associated with the initiation of b/tsDMARDs within 12 months of initial rheumatology assessment.

Results: Of 6,098 RA patients with available follow-up, the mean age was 59.2 years (SD 14.9); 3,912 (64.2%) patients were female; 6,047 (99.2%) patients had available ethnicity data, of whom 5,215 (86.2%) were White, 152 (2.5%) were Black, 478 (7.9%) were Asian, and 202 (3.3%) were of mixed or other ethnicities. 508/6,098 (8.3%) patients initiated b/tsDMARDs within 12 months of their initial rheumatology assessment. Patients aged < 40 years were more likely to be initiated on b/tsDMARDs than individuals > 65 years (multivariable-adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.41; 95% CI 1.83 to 3.19; p < 0.0001). Individuals of Asian ethnicity were nearly 50% less likely to be initiated on b/tsDMARDs than White individuals (aRR 0.52; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.76; p=0.0007), which persisted after adjustment for socioeconomic status, comorbidities, baseline disease severity, and the initial response to conventional synthetic DMARDs (Figure 1). These differences were evident for Asian females but not Asian males. Individuals of Black ethnicity were more likely to be initiated on b/tsDMARDs than White individuals (aRR 1.54; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.16; p=0.012), which became non-significant after adjusting for baseline disease severity and seropositivity status.

Conclusion: The initiation of b/tsDMARDs for patients with newly diagnosed RA varies markedly by ethnicity and age, despite England and Wales having a universal healthcare system. Our study demonstrates the importance of providing tailored information and ensuring equitable access to high-quality care for underserved patient groups. The one-size-fits-all approach must be reconsidered if health disparities are to be mitigated effectively.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. Probability of initiating b/tsDMARDs within 12 months of initial rheumatology assessment for individuals with new RA diagnoses, by ethnicity, age group (top panel) and gender (bottom panel). Probabilities have been adjusted for socioeconomic status (index of multiple deprivation), comorbidities (lung disease, cardiovascular disease, depression, cancer) and smoking status. The horizontal dashed line represents the overall proportion of individuals who initiated a b/tsDMARD within 12 months.


Disclosures: M. Russell: AbbVie, Biogen, Lilly, Galapagos, Menarini, UCB, Viforpharma, 6, Sandoz UK, 5; M. Gibson: None; B. Zuckerman: None; K. Kumar: None; S. Dubey: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 1; M. Adas: None; E. Alveyn: UCB, 12, Support for attending educational meeting; S. Patel: None; Z. Yang: None; K. Bechman: UCB, viforpharma, 6; E. Price: None; S. Gallagher: None; A. Cope: AbbVie, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, GSK/Galvini, 12, Data monitoring committee, Janssen, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; S. Norton: None; J. Galloway: AbbVie, 6, AstraZeneca, 5, Galapagos, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Lilly, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Russell M, Gibson M, Zuckerman B, Kumar K, Dubey S, Adas M, Alveyn E, Patel S, Yang Z, Bechman K, Price E, Gallagher S, Cope A, Norton S, Galloway J. Predictors of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARD Initiation for Rheumatoid Arthritis Across Underserved Patient Groups: Insights from a National Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-biologic-and-targeted-synthetic-dmard-initiation-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-across-underserved-patient-groups-insights-from-a-national-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predictors-of-biologic-and-targeted-synthetic-dmard-initiation-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-across-underserved-patient-groups-insights-from-a-national-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology