ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0328

Predicting Progression from Undifferentiated to Definitive Connective Tissue Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sarah Dyball1, Mia Rodziewicz1, Claudia Mendoza Pinto2, Ian N. Bruce3 and Ben Parker4, 1The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, High-Specialty Medical Unit-CIBIOR, Mexican Social Security Institute, Puebla, Mexico, 3Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: meta-analysis, prognostic factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I: Diagnosis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) encapsulates a broad range of conditions including incomplete forms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and systemic sclerosis (SSc), some of whom progress to a formal clinical diagnosis over time. It is characterised by clinical and laboratory features suggestive of a systemic autoimmune disease that are not sufficient to diagnose a defined connective tissue disease (CTD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify clinical and laboratory features and biomarkers that can predict progression of UCTD.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception until February 2021. Abstracts and full-text manuscripts were screened by two reviewers. Publications were included if they included at least 20 UCTD patients, a minimum of six months of follow up, and provided data on at least one risk factor for developing a defined CTD. QUIPS tool was used to assess risk of bias and GRADE approach for grading the quality of the evidence. For predictors reported in at least two studies, meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models to pool effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the standard chi-squared test and I2 statistic. Influence analysis was carried out to identify outlier studies with extreme effect sizes. Publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of funnel plots and Egger’s test. The study is registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021237725)

Results: A total of 3871 articles were initially identified via the literature search; 2559 abstracts were screened and 196 full-texts were reviewed for eligibility. Forty-five studies were included in the systematic review, and thirty-three in the meta-analysis. The predictors for progression to SLE with the highest quality of evidence included those with younger age, serositis, or the presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies (table 1). For SSc, the highest quality of evidence included puffy fingers, abnormal nailfold changes (avascular areas or giant capillaries) and SSc specific antibodies (table 2). No novel biomarkers were included in the meta-analysis however HLA antigens, T-regulatory cell shift, and complement activation products were reported as potential predictors for SLE. All studies were rated as having a high or moderate risk of bias (figure 1).

Conclusion: Clinical and immunological parameters may predict which patients with UCTD progress to definitive disease however, the heterogeneous nature and risk of bias in most studies limits the ability to apply these results in routine clinical practice. Limited data suggest that some novel biomarkers may provide additional predictive value but these will need larger well designed studies to fully delineate their clinical utility.

Supporting image 1

Table 1 Predictors for progression from UCTD to SLE. ANA, antinuclear antigen; anti-dsDNA, anti-double stranded DNA; anti-Sm, anti-Smith; GRADE, grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluations; MD, mean difference; RR, relative risk; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; UCTD, undifferentiated connective tissue disease

Supporting image 2

Table 2 Predictors for progression from UCTD to SSc. ANA, antinuclear antigen; GRADE, grading of recommendations assessment development and evaluations; MD, mean difference; NFC, nail-fold capillaroscopy; RR, relative risk; SSc, systemic sclerosis; UCTD, undifferentiated connective tissue disease

Supporting image 3

Figure 1 Quality in prognostic studies (QUIPS) analysis across studies (n=45) included in the systematic review


Disclosures: S. Dyball, UCB, Eli Lilly; M. Rodziewicz, UCB; C. Mendoza Pinto, None; I. Bruce, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Eli Lilly, Aurinia, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK); B. Parker, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dyball S, Rodziewicz M, Mendoza Pinto C, Bruce I, Parker B. Predicting Progression from Undifferentiated to Definitive Connective Tissue Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predicting-progression-from-undifferentiated-to-definitive-connective-tissue-diseases-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/predicting-progression-from-undifferentiated-to-definitive-connective-tissue-diseases-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology