ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2037

Poor Quality of Gout Care Is Strongly Associated with Higher Gout-Related Health Care Utilization

Jasvinder A. Singh1 and Joshua Richman2, 1Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 2Biostatistics, UAB School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout, Outcome measures, quality of care, uric acid and utilization review

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Innovations in Practice Management and Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  

Proponents of improving quality of gout care have suggested various gout quality indicators, but no study to date has shown the link between good quality care and improved outcomes. The aim of the study was to assess  whether appropriate good quality care for gout, including uninterrupted urate-lowering therapy (ULT) and achievement of target serum urate <6 mg/dl, is associated with reduced gout-related utilization.

Methods:

This retrospective study utilized the Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative and clinical databases claims from fiscal years 2002 to 2010, using the presence of an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9) code, 274.xx in a VA outpatient or inpatient visit to define the gout cohort.  A 90-day or longer filled VA prescription for allopurinol, probenecid or febuxostat in a patient with gout was considered as exposure to ULT.  The two independent predictors of interest were Medication Possession Ratios (MPRs) for each ULT and achievement of target sUA < 6 mg/dl.  The MPR denominator was the number of days from index to the exhaustion of the last prescription and the numerator was days of medication supplied over that period from first to last prescription. We used regression analyses with a quasi-Poisson distribution given the type of data, limiting the analyses to patients with >=1-year of follow-up.  The outcome was counts of visits with an offset for the number of years in the cohort. 

Results:

The gout cohort consisted of 376,421 patients with mean age 70 years, 99% were male and 61% were married.  Their exposure to various medications for the treatment of gout was as follows: allopurinol, 70%; febuxostat, 0.3%; and probenecid, 3%.  Mean follow-up was 6.2 years (standard deviation, 2.9). Higher MPRs for allopurinol, febuxostat, and probenecid were associated with significantly lower outpatient, urgent care, emergency room and overall visits (all p-values <0.0001; Table 1).  Achievement of target sUA < 6 mg/dl was associated with significantly lower gout-related outpatient, inpatient, urgent care and emergency room visits (all p-values <0.012; Table 1).  Conversely, a higher proportion of sUA levels >=6 mg/dl was associated with higher gout-related outpatient, inpatient, urgent care and emergency room visits (all p-values <0.00001).

Table 1. Association of MPR for three ULTs and of achievement of target sUA < 6mg/dl with future gout-related health care utilization

 

Incidence rate ratio* [p-value]

 

Any visit

Outpatient visit

ER visit

Urgent care

Inpatient

Adherence to ULT

 

 

 

 

 

Allopurinol MPR (n=231,131)

0.50

[p<0.00001]

0.50

[p<0.00001]

0.32

[p<0.00001]

0.38

[p<0.00001]

0.80

[p=0.00005]

Febuxostat MPR (n=759)

0.64

[p=0.0031]

0.66

[p=0.0074]

0.38

[p=0.00073]

0.28

[p=0.0078]

0.85

[p=0.661]

Probenecid MPR (n=10,514)

0.47

[p<0.00001]

0.47

[p<0.00001]

0.45

[p<0.00001]

0.40

[p=0.00374]

0.89

[p=0.63]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Achieving target sUA

 

 

 

 

 

Any sUA <6 mg/dl (n=161,069)

0.99

[p=0.11]

1.02

[p=0.0116]

0.79

[p<0.00001]

0.57

[p<0.00001]

0.90

[p=0.0105]

Proportion of sUA levels >=6 mg/dl (n=161,069)

1.72

[p<0.00001]

1.62

[p<0.00001]

2.43

[p<0.00001]

4.05

[p<0.00001]

2.87

[p<0.00001]

*Incidence rate ratio for each outcome is for patients with MPR of 1 versus 0

Conclusion:

This is the first study to find evidence of association of poor quality of care (lower ULT MPR and non-achievement of target sUA) with greater gout-related health care utilization, especially for emergency room and urgent care visits.  Improvement in quality of gout care may reduce expensive gout-related utilization of emergency room and urgent care resources.


Disclosure:

J. A. Singh,

research and travel grants from Takeda, Savient, Wyeth and Amgen,

2,

J.A.S. has received speaker honoraria from Abbott,

9,

; aConsultant fees from URL pharmaceuticals, Savient, Takeda, Ardea, Allergan and Novartis.,

5;

J. Richman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/poor-quality-of-gout-care-is-strongly-associated-with-higher-gout-related-health-care-utilization/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology