ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0265

Performance of Two Gout Remission Definitions in a Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial of Nurse-led Care

Dansoa Tabi-Amponsah1, Michael Doherty2, Aliya Sarmanova3, Weiya Zhang2, Sarah Stewart4, William Taylor5, Lisa Stamp6 and Nicola Dalbeth7, 1The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2Academic Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham; Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 3Roche Diagnostics International, Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom, 4Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand, 5The University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 6University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand, 7University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: gout, Health Care, Nursing, Outcome measures, Uric Acid, Urate

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies – Basic & Clinical Science Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: To compare the performance of the 2016 preliminary gout remission definition and a simplified gout remission definition in a clinical trial of nurse-led gout care.

Methods: Data were analyzed from a 2-year parallel arm, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial of 517 people with gout, in which participants were assigned 1:1 to receive nurse-led care or usual care1. Remission was defined using the 2016 preliminary gout remission definition2 and a simplified gout remission definition (without serial measures of patient global assessment and pain scores). Binary logistic regression was used to compare intervention groups. Gout-specific quality of life was assessed using items from the Gout Impact Scale (GIS), measured on a 0-100 scale. General linear models were used to compare GIS scores between those in remission and those not in remission using either definition.

Results: During the trial participants in the nurse-led group were more likely to achieve remission using either definition; at Year 2 the odds ratio was 7.92 [95% CI 4.86-12.92] using the 2016 preliminary definition and 11.88 [95% CI 7.49-18.84] using the simplified definition (Table 1). For all participants, remission was more common using either definition in Year 2 than Year 1 (p< 0.001), and at both Year 1 and Year 2 more participants were defined as being in remission using the simplified definition compared with the 2016 preliminary definition (p< 0.001). People in remission using either definition had better gout outcomes assessed using the GIS, including greater control over their gout, with a mean difference of 9.85 [95% CI 3.95-15.74], p< 0.001 using the preliminary definition, and a mean difference of 9.87 [95% CI 3.72-16.01], p= 0.002 using the simplified definition.

Conclusion: The 2016 preliminary gout remission definition and the simplified gout remission definition both discriminated well between nurse-led and usual care groups. The simplified definition identified more people in both groups as being in gout remission and showed high construct validity using a gout-specific health related quality of life instrument. The simplified definition is a feasible and valid option for defining gout remission in gout clinical trials.

1.    Doherty et al, Lancet 2018;392:1403-12

2.   de Lautour et al, Arthritis Care Res 2016;68:667-72

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Proportion of participants in remission by intervention group


Disclosures: D. Tabi-Amponsah: None; M. Doherty: None; A. Sarmanova: Roche, 3; W. Zhang: None; S. Stewart: None; W. Taylor: None; L. Stamp: Uptodate, 9; N. Dalbeth: Arthrosi, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, 6, Avalo Therapeutics, 2, Dexcel Pharma, 2, Hikma, 6, Horizon, 2, 6, JPI, 2, JW Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, LG Chem, 2, Novartis, 6, PK Med, 2, Protalix, 2, PTC Therapeutics, 2, Selecta, 2, Shanton Pharma, 2, Sobi, 2, Unlocked Labs, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tabi-Amponsah D, Doherty M, Sarmanova A, Zhang W, Stewart S, Taylor W, Stamp L, Dalbeth N. Performance of Two Gout Remission Definitions in a Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial of Nurse-led Care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-two-gout-remission-definitions-in-a-two-year-randomized-controlled-trial-of-nurse-led-care/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/performance-of-two-gout-remission-definitions-in-a-two-year-randomized-controlled-trial-of-nurse-led-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology