ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1843

Perceptions and Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort

Jessica Gordon1, Kimberly Showalter1, Yin Wu2, Linda Kwakkenbos3, Marie-Eve Carrier4, Richard Henry2, Nora Østbø2, Julia Nordlund2, Angelica Bourgeault2, Mara Canedo Ayala2, Marie-Nicole Discepola2, Andrea Carboni Jiménez2, Christopher Denton5, Luc Mouthon6, Brett Thombs7 and Robert Spiera1, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada, 5University College London Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, London, United Kingdom, 6Hopital Cochin - Paris University, Paris, France, 7Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: COVID-19, Scleroderma, Systemic, Surveys, Systemic sclerosis, Vaccination

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Systemic Sclerosis & Related Disorders – Clinical Poster III (1836–1861)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination exists among patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, but previous studies have not assessed this specifically in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc, or scleroderma). We surveyed patients enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort regarding their willingness to be vaccinated as well as their perceptions and concerns about the vaccines.

Methods: Participants were adults with physician-verified SSc enrolled in the SPIN Cohort. SPIN includes 47 international centers and has approximately 1600 active participants. From April 9 to May 15, 2021, participants from the SPIN Cohort were invited by email and popups during regular SPIN Cohort assessments to participate in a COVID-19 vaccine survey, which was conducted in English and French. Participants were asked if they had received the vaccine and if not, whether they planned to and their degree of certainty. All were asked to rate factors of importance in the decision to get vaccinated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 – not important, 2 – slightly important, 3 – somewhat important, 4 – important, 5 – very important). These questions were developed based on previous surveys by SPIN investigators in conjunction with patient partners. Responses of those who had or who planned to receive the vaccine were compared to those who were unsure, unlikely or certainly would not get the vaccine. Descriptive statistics and t-tests for mean item differences are presented.

Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 932 responders are shown in Table 1. Of these, 699 (75%) had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, and 842 (90.3%) had either been vaccinated or planned to do so. 90 participants (9.7%) reported feeling unsure [35 (3.8%)], unlikely [31 (3.4%)], or that they would certainly not [24 (2.6%)] get vaccinated.

Responses were compared based on hesitancy (table 2). Patients who received the vaccine or who planned to do so rated multiple considerations of higher importance than those who were hesitant. (2A) The highest mean differences were noted for the following factors: civic duty/setting an example, reducing risk of illness, protecting others. When asked about decision making about getting the vaccine, hesitant patients were more likely to rank as important or very important that enough time had passed to assess risk of long-term side effects and the experiences of other SSc patients. Compared to those who were hesitant, patients who had received the vaccine or who planned to were more likely to rank as important or highly important: their rheumatologist’s recommendation, the ability to discuss concerns with their doctor, and convenience. (2B)

Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 10 participants reported vaccine hesitancy. These results identify factors associated with hesitancy in this group of SSc patients and highlight topics that may be emphasized in providing education which may be helpful for hesitant SSc patients.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical description of survey responders

Table 2. Perceptions of patients based on degree of hesitancy


Disclosures: J. Gordon, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, 5, EICOS Sciences, 5; K. Showalter, None; Y. Wu, None; L. Kwakkenbos, None; M. Carrier, None; R. Henry, None; N. Østbø, None; J. Nordlund, None; A. Bourgeault, None; M. Canedo Ayala, None; M. Discepola, None; A. Carboni Jiménez, None; C. Denton, Acceleron, 2, 6, Actelion, 2, 6, Arxx Therapeutics, 2, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Corbus, 2, 6, CSL Behring, 2, 6, Galapagos NV, 2, 6, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 6, Horizon, 2, 6, Inventiva, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, Servier, 2; L. Mouthon, None; B. Thombs, None; R. Spiera, GSK, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, 5, Chemocentryx, 2, 5, Corbus Pharmaceutical, 5, Formation Biologics, 2, 5, InflaRx, 5, Kadmon, 5, Astra Zeneca, 5, Abbvie, 2, CSL Behring, 2, Sanofi, 2, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 2, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gordon J, Showalter K, Wu Y, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier M, Henry R, Østbø N, Nordlund J, Bourgeault A, Canedo Ayala M, Discepola M, Carboni Jiménez A, Denton C, Mouthon L, Thombs B, Spiera R. Perceptions and Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perceptions-and-concerns-regarding-covid-19-vaccination-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-in-the-scleroderma-patient-centered-intervention-network-spin-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perceptions-and-concerns-regarding-covid-19-vaccination-in-patients-with-systemic-sclerosis-in-the-scleroderma-patient-centered-intervention-network-spin-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology