ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1674

Pediatric and Adolescent One Year Protocol Kidney Biopsies Should Be Performed, Even in Patients with Complete Remission of Their Lupus Nephritis

Peter Yorgin1, Suhas Radhakrishna1, Caitlin Carter1, Johanna Chang1, Katayoon Shayan1, Lieuko Nguyen1, Peter Chiraseveenuprapund1 and Robert Sheets2, 1UCSD/Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, 2University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Cohort Study, Lupus nephritis, Pediatric rheumatology, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical Poster III: SLE, Vasculitis, & JDM

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The value of one-year protocol kidney biopsies in children who have proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is unclear, particularly in patients who meet CARRA criteria for a complete renal response.

Methods: Subjects  < 18 yrs of age, who met ACR systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria with initial kidney biopsy (KBx) proven proliferative LN at Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego (RCHSD) between 1/1/2010 – 12/31/2019 and a pre-planned one year protocol KBx (0.75-1.25 years), were selected for this study.  Kidney biopsies were read by RCHSD Pathologists. CARRA criteria for complete response (CR), partial remission (PR) and flare (F) were assessed at the time of protocol KBx.  Patients were allocated into either CR or non-complete response (PR and F) groups (NCR) for analysis. UCSD/RCHSD IRB 200870X

Results: Of the 19 patients who had a one year protocol KBx, there were 11 CR (58%) and 8 NCR study subjects. There were no statistically significant differences between CR and NCR patients at initial KBx.  Induction therapy was different between the two groups, with CR subjects more likely to receive intravenous cyclophosphamide (CTX).  Patients with CR had significantly improved ISN/RPS class and lower NIH activity and chronicity scores on follow up biopsy compared to the NCR group.  There was no statistically significant worsening in CR NIH chronicity scores.  All SLEDAI scores in CR group at the time of protocol KBx were 4 or less, but 2 NCR patients also had SLEDAI scores of 4.  All but one patient in the NCR group had a change (n=4) or increase in maintenance immunosuppression (n=3) after their KBx.  Five CR subjects had no change in immunosuppression; while 6 (55%) had a decrease in immunosuppression.  CR patients with immunosuppression reduction were more likely to have a decrease of ≥5 in NIH activity scores.  There was one perinephric hemorrhage out of 38 KBx (2.6%) that necessitated an overnight hospital stay.

Conclusion: One year protocol KBx were beneficial in most patients with proliferative LN because the KBx provided histopathologic data to support a change in immunosuppression.  Subjects meeting the CARRA criteria for complete renal response (CR) at had significantly better one year protocol KBx outcomes with greater ISN/RPS class improvement, and lower NIH activity and chronicity scores.  Unexpectedly, two CR patients had KBx that no longer met the criteria for ISN/RPS class 1.  CTX induction therapy of proliferative LN may have been a factor leading to better outcomes. While it is not unexpected that immunosuppression was changed or increased in nearly all NCR patients, the improved KBx results in CR subjects created a decision tree, where physicians either: 1) continued the effective immunosuppression, or 2) decreased immunosuppression.  One year protocol KBx were associated with a low risk of serious adverse events.  Study limitations include: a single center, non-randomized cohort, physician-directed protocol KBx selection and grouping of partial remission and flare groups into the NCR group.  A prospective randomized trial would be able to determine if decreasing immunosuppression at one year for CR subjects would yield acceptable outcomes, as assessed by a two year protocol KBx.

*Chi-square analysis performed comparing improved vs same/worse ISN/RPS class


Disclosure: P. Yorgin, None; S. Radhakrishna, None; C. Carter, Reata Pharmaceuticals, 1; J. Chang, None; K. Shayan, None; L. Nguyen, None; P. Chiraseveenuprapund, Childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance, 1; R. Sheets, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yorgin P, Radhakrishna S, Carter C, Chang J, Shayan K, Nguyen L, Chiraseveenuprapund P, Sheets R. Pediatric and Adolescent One Year Protocol Kidney Biopsies Should Be Performed, Even in Patients with Complete Remission of Their Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pediatric-and-adolescent-one-year-protocol-kidney-biopsies-should-be-performed-even-in-patients-with-complete-remission-of-their-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/pediatric-and-adolescent-one-year-protocol-kidney-biopsies-should-be-performed-even-in-patients-with-complete-remission-of-their-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology