ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2243

Patient Reported Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Sarilumab in Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Vibeke Strand1, Jennifer Sloane Lazar2, Michael C Nivens3, Jingdong Chao4, Stefano Fiore5, Angeliki Giannelou6, Lita Araujo7 and Jerome Msihid8, 1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 2Sanofi, Delray Beach, FL, 3Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, NY, 4Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,, Tarrytown, NY, 5Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, 6Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 7Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, 8Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases, Patient reported outcomes, Randomized Trial, SF36

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Abstracts: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes: Patient Priorities and Preferences: Interventions and Transformation

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease in the elderly. The phase 3 SAPHYR trial (NCT03600818) assessed the efficacy and safety of sarilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against sIL-6Rα, for treatment of relapsing PMR. The primary endpoint, sustained remission at week (wk) 52, was met by sarilumab treatment with rapid glucocorticoid (GC) tapering and less total GC doses (p = 0.0193).1 This analysis assessed its effects on patient reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods: This phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial enrolled 118 patients of the intended 280 as the study was prematurely terminated due to protracted recruitment timelines exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were randomized to receive either sarilumab with a GC tapering regimen over 14 wks (n = 60), or placebo with 52 wk GC taper (n = 58). PROs (Patient Global Assessment of disease activity [PtGA], pain visual analog scale [VAS], Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI], Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue [FACIT-F], Short Form Health Survey version 2 [SF-36 v2], and EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level [EQ-5D-3L]) were assessed at baseline to wk 52. Between-group differences in least-squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline were assessed and proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and scores ≥ normative values compared between groups. All p-values were nominal.

Results: At wk 52, sarilumab treatment resulted in statistically significantly greater improvements from baseline than comparator arm in SF-36 Physical (PCS: p = 0.0172) and Mental (MCS: p = 0.0295) Component Summary scores and 5 of 8 domains (Table 1 & Figure 1). Sarilumab treatment also led to significantly greater improvements from baseline in EQ-5D-3L utility index score (p = 0.0336) and numerically greater improvements in EQ VAS, FACIT-F, HAQ-DI, PtGA, and pain scores (Table 1). Post-hoc analyses demonstrated that more patients treated with sarilumab reported improvements ≥ MCID in SF-36 PCS (p = 0.0161) score (Table 2), resulting in number needed to treat of 3.7. Numerically, there were more sarilumab responder patients across all PROs with exception of SF-36 mental health domain and Pain VAS (Table 2). Numerically more patients receiving sarilumab also reported scores ≥ US age/gender matched normative values in SF-36 MCS and 4 domains, HAQ-DI, and FACIT-F at week 52 (data not shown).

Conclusion: Consistent with the primary endpoint, PROs demonstrated clinically meaningful and robust improvements in health-related quality of life for relapsing PMR patients treated with sarilumab. Sarilumab has not been approved for the treatment of PMR in any jurisdiction.

Reference
1Dasgupta B: LB0006, ARD 2022; 81 Supp 1: p210-11

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Effect of Sarilumab vs Placebo on PROs at Week 52

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Mean SF_36 Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 52

Supporting image 3

Table 2: Patients Reporting Improvements ≥MCID at Week 52


Disclosures: V. Strand, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Celltrion, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Inmedix, Janssen, Kiniksa, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Rheos, R-Pharma, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Scipher, Setpoint, Spherix, Aria, Bioventus, Blackrock, Equilium, Glenmark, Horizon, Kypha, Lilly, MiMedx, Sorrento, Tonix, Priovant; J. Sloane Lazar, Sanofi; M. Nivens, Regeneron; J. Chao, Regeneron; S. Fiore, Sanofi; A. Giannelou, Regeneron; L. Araujo, Sanofi; J. Msihid, Sanofi.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strand V, Sloane Lazar J, Nivens M, Chao J, Fiore S, Giannelou A, Araujo L, Msihid J. Patient Reported Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Sarilumab in Polymyalgia Rheumatica [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-from-a-randomized-phase-3-trial-of-sarilumab-in-polymyalgia-rheumatica/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patient-reported-outcomes-from-a-randomized-phase-3-trial-of-sarilumab-in-polymyalgia-rheumatica/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology